Brain Imaging Techniques That Predict Antidepressant Responsiveness (WyethKolden)

July 3, 2018 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Non-Invasive Brain Imaging Techniques That Predict Antidepressant Responsiveness and Provide Insights Into the Mechanism of Action of Venlafaxine ER vs. Fluoxetine

Do functional brain changes occur during Venlafaxine ER (extended release) versus Fluoxetine treatment and do changes in selective structures, such as the amygdala, predict treatment response?

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single site, controlled, double-blind study of outpatients. There are two arms:

  1. Forty participants who have a current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revised (DSM-IV-TR) diagnosis of Major Depression will be recruited. These subjects will be randomized to receive one of two antidepressant medications: Fluoxetine or Venlafaxine ER for the duration of the study. Subjects will gradually be titrated onto the medications and will be seen in the clinic up to 18 times for medication checks, to monitor side effects and depressive symptoms, including suicidal ideation. In the event of suicidal ideation, subjects will be withdrawn from the study and referred for immediate treatment.
  2. Twenty normal control subjects with no current or past DSM-IV-TR diagnosis and will receive no medication. Normal control subjects will have up to 5 visits while in the study.

Subjects will contact study staff to complete a phone screen and then eligible subjects will complete a clinic screen. Subjects will then be scheduled to attend the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) simulation visit and if subjects continue to meet entrance criteria, they will be scheduled for the first MRI. Following the first MRI, subjects in the medication conditions will begin receiving medication.

All subjects will undergo 3 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)s during the study: at the beginning of the study, approximately 8 weeks and 26 weeks later. During the MRI, subjects will view slides with positive and negative emotional content. Subjects will complete various clinical interviews or rating scales assessing mood and side effects at each of the visits.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53719
        • University of Wisconsin Madison Psychiatry Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Intervention Group:

    • Right-handed,
    • Be able to lie still on their back for about 120 minutes,
    • Meet DSM-IV criteria for major depression (single or recurrent),
    • Have had depressive symptoms for at least 1 month prior to screen visit,
    • Must score an 18 or above on the Hamilton-D at both the initial screening visit and first fMRI scanning session,
    • Able to understand and speak English.
  • Control Group: same as above with the exception of no diagnosis of psychiatric disorder.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any history of seizures,
  • Current medical disorders that might make interpretation of scan data difficult,
  • Diabetes requiring insulin treatment,
  • A serious heart disorder or subjects who have had a heart attack within the last 3 months,
  • Subjects who meet DSM-IV criteria for alcohol/drug abuse or dependence within the last six months,
  • Other current DSM-IV Axis I or Axis II diagnoses,
  • A personal or family history of bipolar disorder,
  • Current use of medication that affects central nervous system (CNS) function,
  • Participation in the last 30 days in a clinical study involving an investigational drug,
  • A subject with metallic implants, such as prostheses, shrapnel or aneurysm clip-S, or persons with electronic implants, such as cardiac pacemakers. The magnetic field generated by the MRI machine can cause a displacement or malfunctioning of these devices.
  • A subject who is claustrophobic,
  • Female subjects who are pregnant,
  • A subject at serious risk for suicide,
  • Diagnosis of cancer in the past 3 years and/or has active neoplastic disease,
  • Nonresponse to 2 adequate trials of antidepressant treatment,
  • Nonresponse to 2 adequate trials of an empirically supported psychotherapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Depressed; Venlafaxine treatment
Currently depressed subjects; Randomized medication treatment with Venlafaxine extended release tablets (Venlafaxine ERT). Dosage 75-300mg/day for up to 6 months.
Drug: Venlafaxine ERT
Titrated to a minimum dose of 75mg. Further titration based on clinician assessment at followup visits. Intervention to continue through completion of study (180 days). Initial titration: Days 1-7: 37.5 mg; Days 7-14: 75 mg; Days 15-180: 75-300mg based on clinician assessment. Titration rate is a maximum of 75mg/7d.
Other Names:
  • Effexor ER
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Depressed; Fluoxetine treatment
Currently depressed subjects; Randomized medication treatment with Fluoxetine tablets. Dosage 20-80mg/day for up to 6 months.
Drug: Fluoxetine
Titrated to a minimum dose of 20mg. Further titration based on clinician assessment at followup visits. Intervention to continue through completion of study (180 days). Initial titration: Days 1-7: 20mg; Days 7-14: 20mg; Days 15-180: 20-80mg based on clinician assessment. Titration rate is a maximum of 20mg/7d
Other Names:
  • Prozac
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
Non-psychiatric subjects with no past or current history of depression. Subjects will receive no medication

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) and Anxiety (HAM-A) Rating Scales
Time Frame: Study entry, 2 months, and at end of study (6 mos)

Hamilton Depression rating scale is a clinician assessment tool to measure severity of depression symptoms. Minimum score is 0 (no symptoms); maximum score is 52 (severe symptoms of depression).

Hamilton Anxiety rating scale is a clinician assessment tool to measure severity of anxiety symptoms. Minimum score is 0 (no symptoms); maximum score is 56 (severe symptoms of anxiety).
Study entry, 2 months, and at end of study (6 mos)
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Response to an Emotional Regulation Task.
Time Frame: At study entry, 2 months and end of study (6 months)

Depressed participants were scanned while viewing a sequence of positive and negative images; they were instructed to enhance or supress their emotional response to the image or to continue to attend. To examine brain function when regulating negative affect, we created contrast maps for each participant at all 3 time points by subtracting the attend condition from the suppress condition in response to negative stimuli. Data from all 3 scan sessions were used to assess treatment-induced change in brain activity when regulating emotion. Analyses examining change using difference scores (end vs. starting points), we subtracted initial HAMD score from final HAMD score. For fMRI analyses, in a voxelwise manner, we subtracted initial negative suppress vs attend from final negative suppress vs attend.

Control subjects were not depressed, repeat scans to assess change were not completed.

Reported results are from BA10, one of our areas of interest.
At study entry, 2 months and end of study (6 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gregory Kolden, Ph.D., University of Wisconsin Madison Psychiatry Department
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Peterson, MD, Ph.D., University of Wisconsin Madison Psychiatry Department

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2002

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 18, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 27, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 3, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0600B-100953
  • 2001-294 (OTHER: HS IRB)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Venlafaxine ERT

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings