Study Evaluating Safety and Adherence to Treatment With Etanercept in Adults With Psoriatic Arthritis (PROVE)

March 27, 2013 updated by: Pfizer

A Post-Marketing Surveillance For Safety And Adherence To Treatment Of Enbrel In Adults With Psoriatic Arthritis In Belgium

The aim of this study is to evaluate if the data obtained in controlled clinical trials are confirmed when Enbrel is used in usual clinical practice in Belgium according to local reimbursement criteria.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
303

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

rheumatology centers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Active erosive psoriatic arthritis of poly-articular type or active erosive or with joint space narrowing psoriatic arthritis of oligo-articular type
  • At least 18 years old
  • Have fulfilled reimbursement criteria for Enbrel in psoriatic arthritis of poly-articular type or oligo-articular type
  • Physician decides to prescribe Enbrel or patient is already on Enbrel
  • Give written informed consent at time of inclusion to study

Exclusion Criteria:

NA

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
PsA Patients (New)
New patients
Other: Questionnaire
This is a non-interventional study
PsA Patients
CU patients
Other: Questionnaire
This is a non-interventional study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Baseline up to Year 1
Time Frame: Baseline up to Year 1
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Baseline up to Year 1
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 1 up to Year 2
Time Frame: Year 1 up to Year 2
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Year 1 up to Year 2
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 2 up to Year 3
Time Frame: Year 2 up to Year 3
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Year 2 up to Year 3
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 3 up to Year 4
Time Frame: Year 3 up to Year 4
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Year 3 up to Year 4
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 4 up to Year 5
Time Frame: Year 4 up to Year 5
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Year 4 up to Year 5
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 5 up to Year 6
Time Frame: Year 5 up to Year 6
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Year 5 up to Year 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE) Per Year
Time Frame: Baseline up to Year 6
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Baseline up to Year 6
Incidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-Year
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66
Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of the years that participants in a study were followed (mean study drug exposure duration multiplied by safety set population). Incidence calculated as AEs or SAEs divided by Participant-Year multiplied by 100. Incidence of AEs and SAEs were broken down by each follow-up time period.
Baseline up to Month 6, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66
Percentage of Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Receiving Enbrel Who Stayed on the Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 78
Baseline up to Month 78
Number of Joints With Active Arthritis
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78
Numbers of joints with active arthritis were defined as joints that were swollen or, in absence of swelling, joints with limited motion with pain and/or tenderness.
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78
Quality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Participant Evaluation
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78
Quality of life for oligo-articular type arthritis was assessed on a 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 1 (best health status) to 10 (worst health status). NRS for the most affected joint as per participant was evaluated.
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78
Quality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Physician Evaluation
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78
Quality of life for oligo-articular type arthritis was assessed on a 11-point NRS ranging from 1 (best health status) to 10 (worst health status). NRS for the most affected joint as per physician was evaluated.
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78
Quality of Life Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) For Poly-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78
HAQ is a 20 item questionnaire to measure functional limitations. Participants were rated on 4 point scale with scores: 0=no difficulty (normal), 1=some difficulty (adequate), 2=much difficulty (limited), 3=unable to do based on degree of difficulty experienced with 20 items grouped into 8 areas of dressing, rising, hygiene, reach, walking, eating, grip and activities. Total score range 0-60, higher score indicating greater functional limitations.
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 10, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 10, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 13, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 27, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 27, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0881A-101698
  • B1801107

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthritis, Psoriatic

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings