Psoriatic Arthritis Treat to Target vs. Usual Care (PRC-05-2011)

April 5, 2017 updated by: Pope Research Corporation

A Trial of Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA): Randomizing to Treat to a Target vs. Usual Care

Canadian Rheumatologists will be randomized to treat their participants with active Psoriatic Arthritis to a target (disease activity score <2.6), or as per their routine care. The aim of this study is to determine whether treating to a target results in greater disease improvement than treating patients using routine care.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Canadian Rheumatologists will be randomized to treat their participants with active Psoriatic Arthritis to a target (disease activity score <2.6), or as per their routine care. The aim of this study is to determine whether treating to a target results in greater disease improvement than treating patients using routine care.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 2S3
        • Pope Research Corp., 68 Green Acres Drive
      • Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
        • The Arthritis Program Research Group
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M9C 5N2
        • Arthur Karasik
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 1S6
        • Institut de Rheumatologie de Montreal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Psoriatic Arthritis as diagnosed by a rheumatologist and meeting ACR classification criteria for PsA or CASPAR criteria
  • The subject must provide written informed consent for participation in the study before any study specific procedures are performed
  • Subject has 3 or more SJC on 28 joint count
  • Age >=18

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a history of being non-compliant
  • Serious concomitant illnesses that in the investigator's opinion negate ability to optimally treat the patient
  • If treating with TNF inhibitor, positive PPD > 5mm who have not received INH for recommended course or untreated TB (ie CXR evidence of latent infection). Usual screening is in place for standard of care.
  • Pregnancy, breast-feeding or considering pregnancy over the next 12 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Intensive Care (IC)
Rheumatologists treating to target of DAS28<2.6
Rheumatologist aims to treat participant in order to achieve a disease activity score improvement of DAS28<2.6
NO_INTERVENTION: Routine Care (RC)
Participants treated in the routine manner by their rheumatologist (not treated to the target of DAS28<2.6)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients achieving low DAS
Time Frame: Month 9 Visit
The primary outcome measure will be the percentage of patients achieving low Disease Activity Score (DAS<2.6) in each patient group (Intensive Care vs. Routine Care) at the end of the study.
Month 9 Visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to achieving DAS28<2.6
Time Frame: Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, and Month 9 Visit
Compares the effectiveness of Intensive Care and Routine Care groups, as measured by the time to achieving target of DAS28<2.6
Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, and Month 9 Visit
Absolute change in DAS28
Time Frame: Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, Month 9 Visit
To compare the effectiveness of Intensive Care and Routine Care in improving the patient DAS28.
Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, Month 9 Visit
Percentage of Patients achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70
Time Frame: Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, Month 9 Visit

ACR 20/50/70 defined as:

  • 20%, 50%, or 70% reduction in tender joint count, and
  • 20%, 50%, or 70% reduction in swollen joint count, and
  • a 20%, 50%, or 70% reduction in 3 of the following 5 measures:
  • Patient and physician global assessments (VAS)
  • Patient pain score (VAS)
  • HAQ-DI
  • ESR or CRP
Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, Month 9 Visit
Percentage of patients achieving PsARC
Time Frame: Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, Month 9 Visit

PsARC defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 following measures, one of which must be joint swelling or tenderness, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures:

  • MDGA (0-5 point scale): reduction by 1 point.
  • PGA (0-5 point scale): reduction by 1 point.
  • TJC (76 or 68): reduction by >=30%.
  • SJC (76 or 68): reduction by >=30%.
Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, Month 9 Visit
Absolute change in HAQ-DI
Time Frame: Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, Month 9 Visit
HAQ-DI is a self-administered questionnaire using the patient's functional ability during the last week. It consists of 20 items converging to 8 scales measuring dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. The patients rate each activity as 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = some difficulty, 2 = much difficulty and 4 = unable. The final score ranges from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more disability.
Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, Month 9 Visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Janet E. Pope, MD, MPH, FRCPC, Pope Research Corp., University of Western Ontario, St. Joseph's Health Care London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)

Clinical Trials on Intensive Care

Subscribe