Treatment of Claudication With a Peristaltic Pulse Pneumatic Device

November 3, 2009 updated by: White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Efficacy Study of a Peristaltic Pulse Pneumatic Device in the Treatment of Claudication

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a non-invasive peristaltic pulse pneumatic device (PCD) in the treatment of intermittent claudication in patients having documented peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The pneumatic device to be studied is FDA approved for the treatment of venous disease. While anecdotal evidence exists supporting a decrease in claudication symptoms, there are no previously published data on studies employing this compression device in the treatment of arterial disease. The investigators' primary hypothesis is that patients randomized to the intervention arm of the trial will experience an increase in mean walking ability as compared to the group receiving medical standard of care.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common disorder, affecting 12% of adults older than 50 years of age. Approximately one third of these patients experience intermittent claudication, defined as pain in the thigh or calf muscles during walking and that resolves with rest. Lower extremity pain is often severe enough to significantly limit ambulation, forcing many patients to seek medical care. Current treatments include two FDA-approved medications, supervised walking programs, arterial angioplasty and/or stent placement, and open arterial bypass surgery. The problem is that noninvasive treatments are oftentimes ineffective, while invasive treatments are effective but expensive.

A non-invasive lower extremity treatment that has shown success in treating lymphedema and venous insufficiency will be studied during this protocol to assess its effects on claudication symptoms. Half of the participants in this prospective, single-center randomized controlled trial will be treated with a pneumatic compression device in a home treatment program, while half will receive standard medical therapy. If effective, potential benefits are high, providing relief of personal disability and avoidance of costly surgical intervention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Vermont
      • White River Junction, Vermont, United States, 05009
        • White River Junction VAMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consistent claudication symptoms for at least 6 months
  • ABIs at rest as follows: 0.5>ABI<0.8 minimally on one leg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refuses to consent
  • Unlikely to be compliant with protocol
  • Unable to perform treadmill test
  • Current use of Cilostazol (Pletal) or Pentoxyphylline (Trental)
  • Lower extremity surgery or endovascular procedure within the last 3 months
  • Currently has a non-healing wound on either leg
  • DVT in the past 3 months
  • Unstable hypertension, angina, uncontrolled glucose levels
  • Participating in a supervised exercise regimen
  • Claudication medications regime changed within the last 3 months
  • Diagnosis of Raynaud's Disease
  • Requires a custom fabricated boot appliance
  • Single limb amputees meeting inclusion criteria may participate in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Exercise and lifestyle counselling
Patients will receive standard recommendations for ambulatory exercise and standard educational discussion of risk factor control, including smoking cessation.
Other: Exercise and lifestyle counseling
Patients will receive standard recommendations for ambulatory exercise and standard educational discussion of risk factor control, including smoking cessation.
Other Names:
  • Ambulatory exercise
  • Smoking cessation counseling
Experimental: PCD with peristaltic pulse waveform
Daily use for two hours
Device: Peristaltic pulse PCD
Daily use for two hours
Other Names:
  • NormaTec PCD
  • Exercise and lifestyle counselling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Peak walking time (in seconds) during a graded-protocol treadmill test
Time Frame: initial; 3 months; 6 months
initial; 3 months; 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Claudication onset time (in seconds) during a graded-protocol treadmill test
Time Frame: initial; 3 months; six months
initial; 3 months; six months
Walking Impairment Questionnaire, including pain subscale, speed subscale and stair climbing subscale
Time Frame: initial; 3 months; 6 months
initial; 3 months; 6 months
Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI)
Time Frame: initial; 3 months; 6 months
initial; 3 months; 6 months
Integumentary changes as evaluated by photographs of lower extremity hair pattern and great toenail growth
Time Frame: initial; 3 months; 6 months
initial; 3 months; 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
NormaTec Industries LP

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sharon R Besso, MS, ARNP, White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph P Duggan, DPM, White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 3, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 3, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 4, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 4, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 3, 2009

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 21975

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intermittent Claudication

Clinical Trials on Exercise and lifestyle counseling

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings