Efficacy of Two Antiemetic Regimens in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy and Concomitant Weekly Cisplatin (GAND-emesis)

April 23, 2015 updated by: Christina Ruhlmann, Odense University Hospital

A Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Palonosetron and Dexamethasone Plus Fosaprepitant or Placebo in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy and Weekly Cisplatin.

GAND-emesis is a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a neurokinin1 receptor antagonist (fosaprepitant dimeglumine) in combination with an antiemetic (anti-nausea-and-vomiting) control regimen (palonosetron and dexamethasone) in patients with a gynaecological cancer diagnosis, who are scheduled to receive radiotherapy and weekly chemotherapy.

The study aims at investigating if a three-drug antiemetic regimen is superior to a two-drug regimen (standard treatment) in preventing nausea and vomiting in patients receiving radiotherapy and weekly chemotherapy. A pilot study demonstrated that approximately 50% of patients will experience nausea and vomiting when offered a two-drug antiemetic regimen, and it is expected that addition of a third drug (a neurokinin1 receptor antagonist) can increase the proportion of patients with no vomiting in the course of combined chemo-radiotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
246

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
      • Adelaide SA, Australia, 5000
        • RAH Cancer Centre, Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • Denmark
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
        • Department of Oncology
      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Rigshospitalet, Finsen Centret
      • Herlev, Denmark, 2730
        • Herlev Hospital
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital
  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln
      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • Universitatsklinikum Schleswig Holstein
  • Norway
      • Oslo, Norway, 0310
        • The Norwegian Radium Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria: (abbreviated)

  1. The patient has a diagnosis cervical cancer.
  2. The patient understands the nature and purpose of this study and the study procedures and has signed informed consent.
  3. The patient is aged > 18 years.
  4. The patient must be both chemo- and radiotherapy (RT) naïve. NB: previously low voltage RT or electron RT for non-melanoma skin cancers is allowed.
  5. The patient is scheduled to receive fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin at a dose of ≥ 40 mg/m2 for at least five weeks.
  6. Brachy therapy is scheduled to be initiated after the third cycle of weekly cisplatin, and preferentially after the fifth week of treatment.
  7. Chemotherapy with an emetic risk potential of minimal or mild (up to 30%) is allowed on days 1-4 (see ref. 14).
  8. The patient has a WHO Performance Status of ≤ 2.

Exclusion Criteria: (abbreviated)

  1. The patient has a current malignant diagnosis other than cervical cancer, with exception of non-melanoma skin cancers.
  2. The patient is aged < 18 years.
  3. The patient is scheduled to receive less than five weeks of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin.
  4. Brachy therapy is planned to be initiated before the third cycle of weekly cisplatin.
  5. The patient has been previously treated with radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy, with exception of treatment with low voltage RT or electron RT for non-melanoma skin cancers .
  6. The patient has a WHO Performance Status of > 2.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Fosaprepitant dimeglumine
Drug: Fosaprepitant dimeglumine
Addition of fosaprepitant dimeglumine 150 mg IV single dose weekly (before chemotherapy) to dexamethasone and palonosetron.
Other Names:
  • Dexamethasone
  • Palonosetron
Placebo Comparator: Saline water
Drug: Placebo
Saline water

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare fosaprepitant dimeglumine, palonosetron, and dexamethasone with palonosetron, dexamethasone, and placebo with respect to efficacy; the proportion of subjects with no vomiting during five weeks of radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin.
Time Frame: 35 days
35 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen in terms of the proportion of subjects with complete response in the 7 days following initiation of radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin.
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen in terms of the proportion of subjects with no significant nausea during five weeks of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin at a dose of ≥ 40 mg/m2.
Time Frame: 35 days
35 days
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen with respect to complete response in the 35 days following initiation of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin at a dose of ≥ 40 mg/m2.
Time Frame: 35 days
35 days
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen in terms of the proportion of subjects with no nausea during five weeks (35 days) of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin at a dose of ≥ 40 mg/m2.
Time Frame: 35 days
35 days
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen in terms of the number of days to first emetic episode.
Time Frame: 0-35 days
0-35 days
To compare quality of life using the FLIE questionnaire.
Time Frame: 0-35 days
0-35 days
To compare tolerability of both regimens.
Time Frame: 0-35 days
0-35 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Odense University Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Helsinn Healthcare SA

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Jorn Herrstedt, MD, DMSci, Odense University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Christina Ruhlmann, MD, Odense University Hospial
  • Principal Investigator: Dorothy Keefe, MD, FRACP, Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Petra Feyer, MD, DMSci, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln in Berlin
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Broe Christensen, MD, PhD, Herlev Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Gunnar Kristensen, MD, PhD, Norwegian Radium Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Henrik Roed, MD, DMSci, The Finsen Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Felix Hilpert, MD, DMSci, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
  • Principal Investigator: Jacob C Lindegaard, MD, Department of Oncology,Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 23, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 24, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GAND-emesis
  • 2009-014691-21 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Genital Neoplasms, Female

Clinical Trials on Fosaprepitant dimeglumine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings