Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-III (LONG-DES-III) (LONG-DES-III)

August 7, 2012 updated by: Seung-Jung Park

Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-III: Sirolimus vs. Everolimus-eluting Stent

This randomized study is a multi-center, randomized, study to compare the efficacy of sirolimus versus everolimus-eluting stent implantation for long coronary lesions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Following angiography, patients with significant diameter stenosis >50% and lesion length (> 25mm) requiring single or multiple long-stent placement (total stent length >28mm) by visual estimation and eligible for LONG-DES III trial inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1 to a) sirolimus-eluting and b) everolimus-eluting stent by the stratified randomization method.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
451

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Anyang, Korea, Republic of
        • Sam Anyang Hospital
      • Bucheon, Korea, Republic of
        • Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of
        • Busan Paik Hospital
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of
        • St.Mary's Catholic Medical Center
      • Cheonan, Korea, Republic of
        • Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital
      • Cheongju, Korea, Republic of
        • St.Mary's Catholic Medical Center
      • Chuncheon, Korea, Republic of
        • Gangwon National University Hospital
      • Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
        • Chungnam National University Hospital
      • GangNeung, Korea, Republic of
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Gwangju, Korea, Republic of
        • Gwangju Christian Hospital
      • Gyongju, Korea, Republic of
        • Dongguk University Hospital
      • Inchon, Korea, Republic of
        • St.Mary's Catholic Medical Center
      • Jeju, Korea, Republic of
        • Jeju Hanla Hospital
      • Jinju, Korea, Republic of
        • Gyeongsang Uniservity Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Seoul Veterans Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • St.Mary's Catholic Medical Center
      • Suwon, Korea, Republic of
        • Ajou University Hospital
      • Ulsan, Korea, Republic of
        • Ulsan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient must be at least 18 years of age.
  • Significant native coronary artery stenosis (>50% by visual estimate) with lesion length of more than 25mm, which requiring single or multiple long stent placement (>=28mm)
  • Patients with silent ischemia, stable or unstable angina pectoris, ad Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction
  • The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical and angiographic follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindication to any of the following medications: aspirin, heparin, clopidogrel, stainless steel, contrast agents, sirolimus, or everolimus.
  • An elective surgical procedure is planned that would necessitate interruption of antiplatelet drugs during the first 6 months post enrollment.
  • Acute ST-segment-elevation MI or cardiogenic shock
  • Terminal illness with life expectancy <1 year
  • Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
  • In-stent restenosis at target vessel (either bare metal stent or drug-eluting stent segment, non-target vessel ISR is permitted)
  • Patients with EF<30%.
  • Serum creatinine level >=3.0mg/dL or dependence on dialysis.
  • Patients with left main stem stenosis (>50% by visual estimate).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Cypher
Sirolimus-eluting stent
Device: Cypher
Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation
Other Names:
  • Sirolimus-eluting stent
Active Comparator: Xience V
Everolimus-eluting stent
Device: Xience V
Everolimus-eluting Stent implantation
Other Names:
  • Everolimus-eluting Stent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
In-segment late luminal loss
Time Frame: 9 month follow-up
9 month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac death
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Composite of death or MI
Time Frame: one month
one month
Composite of death or MI
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Composite of death or MI
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Composite of cardiac death or MI
Time Frame: one month
one month
Composite of cardiac death or MI
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Composite of cardiac death or MI
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Myocardial infarction (MI)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Target vessel revascularization (ischemia-driven and clinically-driven)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Target lesion revascularization (ischemia-driven and clinically-driven)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
All Death
Time Frame: one month
one month
Cardiac death
Time Frame: one month
one month
Stent thrombosis (ARC criteria)
Time Frame: one month
one month
All Death
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Cardiac death
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Target-vessel failure (death from any cause, myocardial infarction, and ischemic-driven target-vessel revascularization)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Stent thrombosis (ARC criteria)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
In-stent late loss at 9 month angiographic follow-up
Time Frame: at 9 month angiographic follow-up
at 9 month angiographic follow-up
In-stent and in-segment restenosis at 9 month angiographic follow-up
Time Frame: at 9 month angiographic follow-up
at 9 month angiographic follow-up
Angiographic pattern of restenosis at 9 month angiographic follow-up
Time Frame: at 9 month angiographic follow-up
at 9 month angiographic follow-up
Volume of intimal hyperplasia at 9 month IVUS follow-up (sub-study)
Time Frame: at 9 month angiographic follow-up
at 9 month angiographic follow-up
Incidence of late stent malapposition at 9 month IVUS follow-up (sub-study)
Time Frame: at 9 month angiographic follow-up
at 9 month angiographic follow-up
Procedural success defined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of <30% by QCA using any percutaneous method, without the occurrence of death, Q wave MI, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay.
Time Frame: 3 days in average
At discharge from the index hospitalization, participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 days.
3 days in average
All Death
Time Frame: one year
one year
Myocardial infarction (MI)
Time Frame: one month
one month
Myocardial infarction (MI)
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Target vessel revascularization (ischemia-driven and clinically-driven)
Time Frame: one month
one month
Target vessel revascularization (ischemia-driven and clinically-driven)
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Target lesion revascularization (ischemia-driven and clinically-driven)
Time Frame: one month
one month
Target lesion revascularization (ischemia-driven and clinically-driven)
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Stent thrombosis (ARC criteria)
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seung-Jung Park

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 18, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 1, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 2, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 8, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 7, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2008-0250

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Cypher

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings