An Efficacy and Safety Study for Tapentadol Extended Release (JNS024ER) in Chronic Pain Participants

May 10, 2013 updated by: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.

Phase II Study of JNS024ER in Japanese Subjects With Chronic Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Low Back Pain

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and to explore the pharmacokinetics (how drugs are absorbed in the body, how they are distributed within the body and how they are removed from the body over time) of tapentadol hydrochloride extended release (ER) tablets in Japanese participants with moderate to severe chronic pain due to osteoarthritis (disorder in which the joints become painful and stiff) of knee or low back pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), multi-center (when more than one hospital or medical school team works on a medical research study), double-blind (neither physician nor participant knows the name of the assigned drug), placebo-control (participants are randomly assigned to a test treatment or to an identical-appearing treatment that does not contain the test drug), parallel-group (each group of participants will be treated at the same time) comparison study in participants with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of knee or low back pain. The study duration will be of 14 weeks, which consists of a screening period of 1 week during which the participants will be evaluated for study eligibility, a treatment period of 12 weeks and a follow-up period of 1 week. The treatment period will consist of titration period (from the initiation of the study treatment to determination of the individual's maintenance dose) and maintenance period (from completion of the titration period to the completion of the treatment period). An optimal dose (maintenance dose) will be determined for each participant during the titration period and the treatment will be continued at the maintenance dose to assess the efficacy and safety. Tapentadol hydrochloride ER tablets 25 to 250 milligram or placebo will be administered orally twice daily. Efficacy and safety of the participants will primarily be evaluated by change from baseline in average pain intensity score based on 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS), respectively. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
91

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Aichi, Japan
      • Amagasaki, Japan
      • Chiba, Japan
      • Chiba N/A, Japan
      • Chikushi, Japan
      • Edogawa, Japan
      • Fukuoka, Japan
      • Fukushima, Japan
      • Hiratsuka, Japan
      • Kawasaki, Japan
      • Koto, Japan
      • Matsudo, Japan
      • Meguro, Japan
      • Minato-Ku, Japan
      • Niigata, Japan
      • Niigata N/A, Japan
      • Osaka, Japan
      • Sagamihara, Japan
      • Shibuya, Japan
      • Shinjuku-Ku, Japan
      • Toshima-Ku, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of knee or low back pain continuing for at least 12 weeks before informed consent
  • Participants who did not achieve adequate analgesia (pain control) with routine treatment with an oral non-opioid analgesic (drug used to control pain) at its usual upper-limit dose or at an adequate fixed dose for at least 14 consecutive days during the 12 weeks before informed consent
  • Participants who have not experienced treatment with conventional opioids, except for short term use of opioid analgesics for treatment of post-operative acute pain more than 30 days before consent or temporary use of codeine phosphate or dihydrocodeine phosphate for purposes other than pain relief (e.g. for antitussive) more than 2 days before informed consent
  • Participants with average pain intensity score of greater than or equal to 5 on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during 48 hours before informed consent and are considered requiring opioid treatment by the Investigator
  • Participants who are able to visit the medical institutions throughout the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who are taking a monoamine oxidase inhibitor within 14 days before informed consent
  • Participants with current or a history of epilepsy or seizure disorders
  • Participants suspected with intracranial hypertension (e.g. traumatic encephalopathy)
  • Participants with uncontrolled or clinically significant arrhythmia (irregular heart rate)
  • Participants with moderate to severe liver dysfunction or severe renal dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebo
Placebo matched to tapentadol hydrochloride ER tablets 25 to 250 mg will be administered orally twice daily for 12 weeks. Dose will be adjusted as per Investigator's discretion.
Experimental: Tapentadol Hydrochloride
Drug: Tapentadol Hydrochloride
Tapentadol hydrochloride extended release (ER) tablets 25 to 250 milligram (mg) will be administered orally twice daily for 12 weeks. Dose will be adjusted as per Investigator's discretion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Participants were asked to assess the average pain intensity on a 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable) by selecting a number applicable to their pain on the scale. The mean pain intensity during the past 74 hours (3 days) was evaluated at Baseline and the mean pain intensity during the past 12 hours was evaluated at subsequent study visits.
Baseline, Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Participants were asked to assess the average pain intensity on a 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable) by selecting a number applicable to their pain on the scale. The mean pain intensity during the past 74 hours (3 days) was evaluated at Baseline and the mean pain intensity during the past 12 hours was evaluated at subsequent study visits.
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Week 12
Percentage of participants with improvement in mean NRS score by greater than or equal to 30 percent or 50 percent in the last week from Baseline were considered as responders. Participants were asked to assess the average pain intensity on a 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable) by selecting a number applicable to their pain on the scale.
Week 12
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale
Time Frame: Week 8, Week 12
The PGIC is a 7-point scale that requires the participants to assess how much their illness has improved or worsened relative to a Baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The response options are 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improve, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.
Week 8, Week 12
Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Week 8, Week 12
Physician's Global Assessment Scale assesses the therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug for pain control on a 2-point scale of "effective" and "not effective".
Week 8, Week 12
Number of Participants With Presence of Pain Based on Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
BPI-sf is a self-evaluated pain assessment form consisting of 15 items (item 1 - presence of pain, item 2 - pain location, items 3 to 6 - pain severity, item 7 - status of pain treatment, item 8 - efficacy of pain treatment, and items 9a to 9g - interference of pain with daily life). Item 1 for presence of pain assesses the question: "Do you have any pain today other than everyday kinds of pain?" on a 2-point scale of "yes" or "no".
Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants With 50 Percent Pain Relief Based on Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
BPI-sf is a self-evaluated pain assessment form consisting of 15 items (item 1 - presence of pain, item 2 - pain location, items 3 to 6 - pain severity, item 7 - status of pain treatment, item 8 - efficacy of pain treatment, and items 9a to 9g - interference of pain with daily life). Item 8 for efficacy of pain treatment assesses number of participants with at least 50 percent pain relief during the last 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 percent (no relief) to 100 percent (complete relief).
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Total Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
BPI-sf consists of 15 items (item 1 - presence of pain, item 2 - pain location, items 3 to 6 - pain severity, item 7 - status of pain treatment, item 8 - efficacy of pain treatment, and items 9a to 9g - interference of pain with daily life). Total score is defined as the mean scores from items 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9 recorded on an 11-point scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Negative change indicates an improvement in pain.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Based on Sleep Questionnaire at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Sleep Latency was addressed by the question: "How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night?" and the change from Baseline in sleep latency was reported. Decrease in time indicated improvement.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Time Slept Based on Sleep Questionnaire at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Time slept was addressed by the question: "How long did you sleep last night?" and the change from Baseline in time slept was reported.
Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants With Awakenings Based on Sleep Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number of awakenings was addressed by the question: "How many times did you wake up during the night?'' and lesser number signified better sleep.
Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants With Response Based on Overall Quality of Sleep Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Overall quality of sleep was addressed by the question: "Please rate the overall quality of your sleep last night" and participants could choose one of the following options: excellent, good, fair or poor.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Scores at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario MacMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Global Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
WOMAC is a self administered 24-item questionnaire used to evaluate participants with osteoarthritis of the knee. It consists of 3 subscales: pain (5 items), joint stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). Each item is assessed on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4. The global score assesses pain, disability and joint stiffness and ranges from 0 to 96. Higher scores indicate that a symptom is bothersome and physically disabling.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
RDQ scale is used to assess the impact of low back pain on daily activities by participants. The scale consists of 24 item questionnaire with options as "Yes"/"No" where "Yes" is counted as 1 point. The total score ranged from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Baseline, Week 12

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Symptoms Questionnaire (COWS)
Time Frame: Week 12
COWS is an 11-item questionnaire for clinical assessment of withdrawal symptoms. Total score is calculated by adding the scores of all the 11-items. The severity of withdrawal symptoms is categorized using values of total score as: 0-4 = no withdrawal, 5-12 = mild, 13-24 = moderate, 25-36 = moderately severe, and 37-48 = severe withdrawal.
Week 12
Serum Concentration of Tapentadol
Time Frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2, 4, 8, 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 22, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 13, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 14, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 10, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR016999
  • JNS024ER-JPN-N21 (Other Identifier: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Japan)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Tapentadol Hydrochloride

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings