An Efficacy and Safety Study for Tapentadol Extended Release (JNS024ER) in Chronic Pain Participants
Phase II Study of JNS024ER in Japanese Subjects With Chronic Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Low Back Pain
Обзор исследования
Статус
Статус
Условия
Условия
Вмешательство/лечение
Вмешательство/лечение
Подробное описание
Тип исследования
Тип исследования
Регистрация (Действительный)
Регистрация
Фаза
Фаза
- Фаза 2
Контакты и местонахождение
Места учебы
-
-
-
Aichi, Япония
-
Amagasaki, Япония
-
Chiba, Япония
-
Chiba N/A, Япония
-
Chikushi, Япония
-
Edogawa, Япония
-
Fukuoka, Япония
-
Fukushima, Япония
-
Hiratsuka, Япония
-
Kawasaki, Япония
-
Koto, Япония
-
Matsudo, Япония
-
Meguro, Япония
-
Minato-Ku, Япония
-
Niigata, Япония
-
Niigata N/A, Япония
-
Osaka, Япония
-
Sagamihara, Япония
-
Shibuya, Япония
-
Shinjuku-Ku, Япония
-
Toshima-Ku, Япония
-
-
Критерии участия
Критерии приемлемости
Критерии приемлемости
Возраст, подходящий для обучения
Принимает здоровых добровольцев
Полы, имеющие право на обучение
Описание
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of knee or low back pain continuing for at least 12 weeks before informed consent
- Participants who did not achieve adequate analgesia (pain control) with routine treatment with an oral non-opioid analgesic (drug used to control pain) at its usual upper-limit dose or at an adequate fixed dose for at least 14 consecutive days during the 12 weeks before informed consent
- Participants who have not experienced treatment with conventional opioids, except for short term use of opioid analgesics for treatment of post-operative acute pain more than 30 days before consent or temporary use of codeine phosphate or dihydrocodeine phosphate for purposes other than pain relief (e.g. for antitussive) more than 2 days before informed consent
- Participants with average pain intensity score of greater than or equal to 5 on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during 48 hours before informed consent and are considered requiring opioid treatment by the Investigator
- Participants who are able to visit the medical institutions throughout the study period
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who are taking a monoamine oxidase inhibitor within 14 days before informed consent
- Participants with current or a history of epilepsy or seizure disorders
- Participants suspected with intracranial hypertension (e.g. traumatic encephalopathy)
- Participants with uncontrolled or clinically significant arrhythmia (irregular heart rate)
- Participants with moderate to severe liver dysfunction or severe renal dysfunction
Учебный план
Как устроено исследование?
Детали дизайна
- Основная цель: Уход
- Распределение: Рандомизированный
- Интервенционная модель: Параллельное назначение
- Маскировка: Двойной
Количество рук
Оружие и интервенции
Группа участников / АрмияГруппа участников / Армия |
Вмешательство/лечениеВмешательство/лечение |
|---|---|
|
Плацебо Компаратор: Плацебо
|
Placebo matched to tapentadol hydrochloride ER tablets 25 to 250 mg will be administered orally twice daily for 12 weeks.
Dose will be adjusted as per Investigator's discretion.
|
|
Экспериментальный: Tapentadol Hydrochloride
|
Tapentadol hydrochloride extended release (ER) tablets 25 to 250 milligram (mg) will be administered orally twice daily for 12 weeks.
Dose will be adjusted as per Investigator's discretion.
|
Что измеряет исследование?
Первичные показатели результатов
Первичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12
Временное ограничение: Baseline, Week 12
|
Participants were asked to assess the average pain intensity on a 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable) by selecting a number applicable to their pain on the scale.
The mean pain intensity during the past 74 hours (3 days) was evaluated at Baseline and the mean pain intensity during the past 12 hours was evaluated at subsequent study visits.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
Вторичные показатели результатов
Вторичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Временное ограничение: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
|
Participants were asked to assess the average pain intensity on a 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable) by selecting a number applicable to their pain on the scale.
The mean pain intensity during the past 74 hours (3 days) was evaluated at Baseline and the mean pain intensity during the past 12 hours was evaluated at subsequent study visits.
|
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Временное ограничение: Week 12
|
Percentage of participants with improvement in mean NRS score by greater than or equal to 30 percent or 50 percent in the last week from Baseline were considered as responders.
Participants were asked to assess the average pain intensity on a 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable) by selecting a number applicable to their pain on the scale.
|
Week 12
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale
Временное ограничение: Week 8, Week 12
|
The PGIC is a 7-point scale that requires the participants to assess how much their illness has improved or worsened relative to a Baseline state at the beginning of the intervention.
The response options are 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improve, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.
|
Week 8, Week 12
|
|
Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale
Временное ограничение: Week 8, Week 12
|
Physician's Global Assessment Scale assesses the therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug for pain control on a 2-point scale of "effective" and "not effective".
|
Week 8, Week 12
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence of Pain Based on Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Scale
Временное ограничение: Baseline, Week 12
|
BPI-sf is a self-evaluated pain assessment form consisting of 15 items (item 1 - presence of pain, item 2 - pain location, items 3 to 6 - pain severity, item 7 - status of pain treatment, item 8 - efficacy of pain treatment, and items 9a to 9g - interference of pain with daily life).
Item 1 for presence of pain assesses the question: "Do you have any pain today other than everyday kinds of pain?" on a 2-point scale of "yes" or "no".
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
|
Number of Participants With 50 Percent Pain Relief Based on Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Scale
Временное ограничение: Baseline, Week 12
|
BPI-sf is a self-evaluated pain assessment form consisting of 15 items (item 1 - presence of pain, item 2 - pain location, items 3 to 6 - pain severity, item 7 - status of pain treatment, item 8 - efficacy of pain treatment, and items 9a to 9g - interference of pain with daily life).
Item 8 for efficacy of pain treatment assesses number of participants with at least 50 percent pain relief during the last 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 percent (no relief) to 100 percent (complete relief).
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Total Score at Week 12
Временное ограничение: Baseline, Week 12
|
BPI-sf consists of 15 items (item 1 - presence of pain, item 2 - pain location, items 3 to 6 - pain severity, item 7 - status of pain treatment, item 8 - efficacy of pain treatment, and items 9a to 9g - interference of pain with daily life).
Total score is defined as the mean scores from items 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9 recorded on an 11-point scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.
Negative change indicates an improvement in pain.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Based on Sleep Questionnaire at Week 12
Временное ограничение: Baseline, Week 12
|
Sleep Latency was addressed by the question: "How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night?"
and the change from Baseline in sleep latency was reported.
Decrease in time indicated improvement.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Time Slept Based on Sleep Questionnaire at Week 12
Временное ограничение: Baseline, Week 12
|
Time slept was addressed by the question: "How long did you sleep last night?"
and the change from Baseline in time slept was reported.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
|
Number of Participants With Awakenings Based on Sleep Questionnaire
Временное ограничение: Baseline, Week 12
|
Number of awakenings was addressed by the question: "How many times did you wake up during the night?''
and lesser number signified better sleep.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
|
Number of Participants With Response Based on Overall Quality of Sleep Questionnaire
Временное ограничение: Baseline, Week 12
|
Overall quality of sleep was addressed by the question: "Please rate the overall quality of your sleep last night" and participants could choose one of the following options: excellent, good, fair or poor.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Scores at Week 12
Временное ограничение: Baseline, Week 12
|
SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary).
Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both.
All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario MacMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Global Score at Week 12
Временное ограничение: Baseline, Week 12
|
WOMAC is a self administered 24-item questionnaire used to evaluate participants with osteoarthritis of the knee.
It consists of 3 subscales: pain (5 items), joint stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items).
Each item is assessed on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4. The global score assesses pain, disability and joint stiffness and ranges from 0 to 96.
Higher scores indicate that a symptom is bothersome and physically disabling.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Score at Week 12
Временное ограничение: Baseline, Week 12
|
RDQ scale is used to assess the impact of low back pain on daily activities by participants.
The scale consists of 24 item questionnaire with options as "Yes"/"No" where "Yes" is counted as 1 point.
The total score ranged from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
Другие показатели результатов
Другие показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Symptoms Questionnaire (COWS)
Временное ограничение: Week 12
|
COWS is an 11-item questionnaire for clinical assessment of withdrawal symptoms.
Total score is calculated by adding the scores of all the 11-items.
The severity of withdrawal symptoms is categorized using values of total score as: 0-4 = no withdrawal, 5-12 = mild, 13-24 = moderate, 25-36 = moderately severe, and 37-48 = severe withdrawal.
|
Week 12
|
|
Serum Concentration of Tapentadol
Временное ограничение: Week 2, 4, 8, 12
|
Week 2, 4, 8, 12
|
Соавторы и исследователи
Спонсор
Спонсор
Даты записи исследования
Изучение основных дат
Начало исследования
Начало исследования
Первичное завершение (Действительный)
Первичное завершение
Завершение исследования (Действительный)
Завершение исследования
Даты регистрации исследования
Первый отправленный
Первый отправленный
Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества
Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества
Первый опубликованный (Оценивать)
Первый опубликованный
Обновления учебных записей
Последнее опубликованное обновление (Оценивать)
Последнее опубликованное обновление
Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества
Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества
Последняя проверка
Последняя проверка
Дополнительная информация
Термины, связанные с этим исследованием
Ключевые слова
Дополнительные соответствующие термины MeSH
- Боль
- Неврологические проявления
- Заболевания суставов
- Заболевания опорно-двигательного аппарата
- Ревматические заболевания
- Артрит
- Остеоартрит
- Боль в спине
- Боль в пояснице
- Остеоартрит, Колено
- Хроническая боль
- Физиологические эффекты лекарств
- Адренергические агенты
- Нейротрансмиттерные агенты
- Молекулярные механизмы фармакологического действия
- Депрессанты центральной нервной системы
- Агенты периферической нервной системы
- Анальгетики
- Агенты сенсорной системы
- Анальгетики, Опиоиды
- Наркотики
- Ингибиторы захвата нейротрансмиттеров
- Модуляторы мембранного транспорта
- Ингибиторы адренергического захвата
- Тапентадол
Другие идентификационные номера исследования
Другие идентификационные номера исследования
- CR016999
- JNS024ER-JPN-N21 (Другой идентификатор: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Japan)
Эта информация была получена непосредственно с веб-сайта clinicaltrials.gov без каких-либо изменений. Если у вас есть запросы на изменение, удаление или обновление сведений об исследовании, обращайтесь по адресу register@clinicaltrials.gov. Как только изменение будет реализовано на clinicaltrials.gov, оно будет автоматически обновлено и на нашем веб-сайте. .