Vax Facts Human Papillomavirus (HPV): Study of a Computer-based Tailoring System and Mothers' Intentions to Vaccinate Their Daughters Against HPV
Vax Facts HPV: Study of a Computer-based Tailoring System and Mothers' Intentions to Vaccinate Their Daughters Against HPV
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48104
- UMHS Outpatient Pediatrics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Mother is greater than or equal to 18 years of age
- Mother has a daughter who is between the ages of 11-15 years
- Daughter has not received any doses of the HPV vaccine
- When asked to describe how she feels about getting her daughter vaccinated against HPV in the next six months, mother responds "I don't want her to get vaccinated" or "I'm unsure if I want her vaccinated."
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cannot read/speak English
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Tailoring
Individuals assigned to the experimental group will receive a two-page brochure tailored based on their responses to the survey.
|
Both the intervention and control groups will use a computer-based tailoring system to respond to survey questions.
The computer-based tailoring system will produce messages for a two-page educational brochure based on participants' responses to survey questions.
Only the intervention group will receive this brochure.
|
|
Active Comparator: Untailored information
Individuals assigned to the control group will receive the CDC vaccine information sheet that is standardly provided.
|
Both the intervention and control groups will use a computer-based tailoring system to respond to survey questions.
The computer-based tailoring system will produce messages for a two-page educational brochure based on participants' responses to survey questions.
Only the intervention group will receive this brochure.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mother's Intention to Vaccinate Daughter Against HPV
Time Frame: Date of intervention (one day)
|
Mother will rate her intention to have her daughter vaccinated against HPV using a Likert scale before and after the intervention.
The scale ranges from 0-11 with higher numbers representing more positive intentions to vaccinate against HPV, and 5 being neutral intentions (i.e.
neither positive nor negative).
In this assessment we use this 11-point scale to assess vaccination before and after viewing the educational materials.
The difference pre and post intervention in vaccination intention is calculated (min 0, max 11) and the mean of these differences are calculated for the control and intervention groups.
|
Date of intervention (one day)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Vaccination of Daughter
Time Frame: Less than or equal to three months from the date of the intervention
|
With mother's consent, daughter's University of Michigan vaccination record will be accessed to determine whether daughter has received any doses of the HPV vaccine.
If the University of Michigan vaccination record does not document a visit three months after the intervention, with mother's consent, research staff will call mother at home to determine whether daughter has received any doses of the HPV vaccine.
|
Less than or equal to three months from the date of the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amanda Dempsey, MD, PhD, MPH, Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Lawson HW, Chesson H, Unger ER; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007 Mar 23;56(RR-2):1-24.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National, state, and local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years--United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Sep 18;58(36):997-1001.
- Chesson HW, Blandford JM, Gift TL, Tao G, Irwin KL. The estimated direct medical cost of sexually transmitted diseases among American youth, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;36(1):11-9. doi: 10.1363/psrh.36.11.04.
- Dempsey AF, Abraham LM, Dalton V, Ruffin M. Understanding the reasons why mothers do or do not have their adolescent daughters vaccinated against human papillomavirus. Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;19(8):531-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
- Dempsey A, Cohn L, Dalton V, Ruffin M. Patient and clinic factors associated with adolescent human papillomavirus vaccine utilization within a university-based health system. Vaccine. 2010 Jan 22;28(4):989-95. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.133. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
- Dempsey AF, Zimet GD, Davis RL, Koutsky L. Factors that are associated with parental acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccines: a randomized intervention study of written information about HPV. Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1486-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1381.
- Gust D, Brown C, Sheedy K, Hibbs B, Weaver D, Nowak G. Immunization attitudes and beliefs among parents: beyond a dichotomous perspective. Am J Health Behav. 2005 Jan-Feb;29(1):81-92. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.29.1.7.
- Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, Fishbein M, Dijkstra A. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res. 2008 Jun;23(3):454-66. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn004. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 149891
- P50CA101451 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.