High-flow Conditioned Oxygen Therapy Versus Non-invasive Ventilation: Prevention of Post-extubation Failure
Comparison Between High-flow Conditioned Oxygen Therapy and Non-invasive Ventilation in Prevention of Post-extubation Respiratory Failure. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ciudad Real, Spain, 13005
- Hospital General de Ciudad Real
-
-
Madrid
-
San Sebastian de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain, 28703
- Hospital Infanta Sofía
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Low Risk Patients:
- Any extubated patients after tolerating a spontaneous breathing trial.
- High Risk Patients:
- Any extubated patients after >48 hours under mechanical ventilation and any of the following:
>65 years
- cardiac failure as the primary indication of mechanical ventilation
- COPD
- APACHE II >12 points the extubation day
- BMI >30
inability to manage respiratory secretions
- 1 failed spontaneous breathing trial
- 1 comorbidity
- 7 days under mechanical ventilation
Exclusion Criteria:
- <18 years
- thacheotomized patients
- recent facial or cervical trauma/surgery
- active gastro-intestinal bleeding
- lack of cooperation and patients with any failed spontaneous breathing trial because of hypercapnia development.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: High Flow Conditioned Oxygen Therapy in high risk patients
|
OptiFlow system (R) with nasal cannula.
|
|
Active Comparator: Non-invasive mechanical ventilation in High Risk Patients
|
Bilevel pressure support through a facial mask
|
|
Experimental: High Flow Conditioned Oxygen Therapy in Low Risk Patients
|
OptiFlow system (R) with nasal cannula.
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Low Risk Patients
|
Conventional Oxygen Therapy with nasal cannula or Venturi facial mask.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Post-extubation respiratory failure and Reintubation rate
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Intensive Care Unit length of stay
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
Intensive Care Unit mortality rate
Time Frame: 3 month
|
3 month
|
|
Hospital mortality rate
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Nosocomial pneumonia rate
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
Tracheobronchitis rate
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Gonzalo Hernandez, MD, Hospital Infanta Sofía
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Gonzalez P, Canabal A, Sanchez S, Rodriguez ML, Villasclaras A, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1565-1574. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14194. Erratum In: JAMA. 2016 Nov 15;316(19):2047-2048. JAMA. 2017 Feb 28;317(8):858.
- Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Gonzalez P, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1354-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2711.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HULP-3116
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.