Abdominal Compression in Orthostatic Hypotension

May 9, 2014 updated by: Mayo Clinic

The Efficacy of Adjustable Lower Abdominal Compression in Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension

The purpose of this study is to assess if abdominal binders that use pull strings to adjust compression (non-elastic) are more effective than standard elastic abdominal binders in attenuating neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In 3 protocols, patients will undergo standing maneuvers, measured abdominal compressions, continuous BP monitoring and symptoms, ease-of-use and compliance scoring. In protocol 1, patients will exert abdominal compression to maximal tolerable and comfortable levels and values will be recorded. In protocol 2, patients will perform 3 standing maneuvers following a preceding rest period with and without abdominal compression at 20 mmHg (binders used in random order). In protocol 3, the standing maneuvers will be extended and the investigator will adjust binders to levels of abdominal compression corresponding to what patient gauged as maximal tolerable and comfortable levels. Comparison of outcome measures will establish which binder achieves higher abdominal compression, is easier to adjust, likely will be used in the future, if elastic and adjustable binders are equally effective in attenuating Orthostatic Hypotension and its associated symptoms at comparable pressures and which binder is more effective in recovering standing BP and improving orthostatic symptoms.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
13

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

SUBJECTS We will study 15 patients of both genders with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (OH). Subjects will be recruited from the existing list of patients available in the database of the Autonomic Disorders Center.

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Men and nonpregnant women aged 18-80 years.
  2. Chronic neurologic conditions known to cause OH: multiple system atrophy (MSA), Parkinson's disease, autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy or progressive autonomic neuropathy (e.g., diabetic, amyloid).
  3. Orthostatic hypotension defined as a drop of systolic BP>30 mmHg or diastolic BP>15 mmHg.
  4. Adrenergic failure of at least moderate severity defined as CASS-adrenergic ≥3.
  5. Ambulatory and able to stand more than 3 minutes without pre-syncope.
  6. BMI <29.
  7. Ability to comply with study procedures and appointments.
  8. Normal cognition (able to understand the study, learn the maneuvers, and follow complex commands).
  9. Concomitant therapy with anticholinergic, alpha and beta agonists will be withdrawn 48 hours prior to autonomic evaluations. Midodrine will be withdrawn the night before evaluation. Fludrocortisone doses up to 0.2 mg per day will be permitted.

The diagnosis of probable MSA requires 1) the presence of orthostatic hypotension or urinary incontinence, and 2) poorly levodopa responsive parkinsonism or cerebellar ataxia.

The diagnosis of clinically definite Parkinson's disease requires 1) the presence of resting tremor, bradykinesia and rigidity, 2) clinical asymmetry, and 3) response to levodopa.

The diagnosis of autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy requires 1) a sub-cute onset, 2) the presence of generalized and severe autonomic failure (CASS>6), 3) selective involvement of autonomic nerve fibers and 4) positive alpha-3 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor auto-antibodies.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Pregnant or lactating females.
  2. Non-neurogenic OH, such as that due to medication or hypovolemia.
  3. Chronic illnesses or other central nervous system conditions that affect autonomic function.
  4. Established dementia.
  5. Debilitating ataxia.
  6. Moderate to severe lower extremity weakness.
  7. Severe systemic illness, such as end-stage pulmonary, cardiac or renal disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Abdominal binder
Standing with abdominal compression using elastic vs. non-elastic abdominal binders.
Other: Abdominal binder
External abdominal compression sequentially applied at 20 mmHg for 3 minutes, maximal tolerable level for 1.5 minutes and comfortable level for 2 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Elastic abdominal binder
  • Non-elastic abdominal binder
Placebo Comparator: No abdominal binder
Standing without abdominal compression
Other: No abdominal binder
Standing without abdominal binder for 3 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between averaged standing blood pressure with and without binders
Time Frame: 3-7 minutes
A 1-minute averaged blood pressure is measured at 3 minutes of standing without abdominal binder and at 3, 4.5 and 6.5 minutes of standing with abdominal binders. All measurements are obtained during a single session.
3-7 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in orthostatic symptom score with and without binders
Time Frame: 3-7 minutes
Orthostatic symptoms are measured at 3 minutes of standing without abdominal binder, and at 3, 4.5 and 6.5 minutes of standing with abdominal binders. All measurements are obtained during a single session.
3-7 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Basford, MD, PhD, Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 28, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 19, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 12, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 9, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 10-005203

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthostatic Hypotension

Clinical Trials on Abdominal binder

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings