ARemind: A Personalized System to Remind for Adherence (ARemind)

February 26, 2019 updated by: Vikram Sheel Kumar, Dimagi Inc.
The main aim of this phase II proposal is to continue and complete development of a cellular phone-based system that assists patients with their medication adherence. Adherence reports will be developed with feedback from patients and providers. Software for patients to report their four day recall adherence through text messaging or short message service (SMS) or interactive voice response (IVR) will be built. An initial qualitative study will evaluate the adherence reports, 4-day adherence recalls, and inform the development of content for reminder text messages that could be resistant to user fatigue. A redesigned system will be tested through a 3-week longitudinal study of 15 patients with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS). An intervention module will have an analytics engine to track adherence levels and personalize delivery of reminder messages. A clinic appointment module will perform patient appointment reminders. The final system with these modules will be tested through a 24-week efficacy study. A total of 115 patients and providers will be involved in the three user studies.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The specific study aims are described below:

  1. Organize the Design, Evaluation, and Implementation Teams: The development of ARemind will be guided by design, evaluation and implementation teams. The design team will build the software architecture and execute the software development with inputs from the user studies. The evaluation team will prepare the institutional review board (IRB) submissions, develop the qualitative instruments, and analyze the qualitative and quantitative data. The implementation team will guide clinical and commercial design aspects including input on the remote adherence assessments, the intervention and clinic appointment modules, and the commercialization plan.
  2. Run first user study as a qualitative assessment of patient and provider preferences of ARemind: A web-based adherence report for providers will be developed. Software modules to assess adherence over the phone through 4-day SMS or IVR recalls will be created along with a protocol for performing phone-based unannounced pill counts. The interfaces will be tested as a part of in-depth qualitative semi-structured interviews with 15 providers and 15 patients to guide the system design.
  3. Study the content preferences through a second user study: A new version of ARemind (version 2.0) will be built based on the feedback from the first user study. It will include the three remote adherence assessment modules. It will be tested longitudinally for 3 weeks on 15 patients with HIV/AIDS. The patients will use Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) software, in the form of MEMS caps, and have weekly clinic visits with adherence counselors who will generate a composite adherence score at each visit. MEMS caps are electronic devices attached to a pill bottle which detect and record the time at which the bottles are opened and closed, using this as an estimate for the number of pills taken. These will be compared to the adherence scores from the remote adherence assessment modules. The patients will give qualitative feedback at each visit on the reminder messages to guide the design of content resistant to user fatigue.
  4. Explore the feasibility of ARemind through a third user study: An intervention module with an analytics engine will be built. It will personalize reminder messages based on adherence levels and facilitate patient phone calls with social workers/adherence counselors when appropriate. A clinic appointment reminder module will be created and interfaced with the health information exchange of Boston Medical Center (BMC). A new version of ARemind (version 3.0) will contain these new modules and content improved based upon the second study. ARemind 3.0 will be tested through a 24-week longitudinal study of 70 patients. Thirty five patients will be randomized to use cell phones with ARemind 3.0 (intervention) while 35 patients will use beepers (control). Patients will use MEMS caps for composite adherence scores that will be done at each of their 9 adherence visits during the study. Analysis of feasibility, efficacy, user-fatigue and cost-savings from improved adherence to medications and clinic appointments will be performed in this aim.

NOTE: OF THESE THREE USER STUDIES, THE FIRST TWO ARE CONSIDERED FEASIBILITY STUDIES WHILE THE LAST IS A MORE LONGITUDINAL CLINICAL STUDY. THIS REGISTRATION IN CLINICALTRIALS.GOV DEALS WITH THE THIRD USER STUDY, WHICH IS THE LONGEST, INVOLVES THE MOST PARTICIPANTS, AND DEMONSTRATES THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF INTERVENTIONS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Center for HIV/AIDS Care and Research, Boston Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stable ART (no change of ART for 3 months)
  • Greater than 18 years of age
  • Self-report adherence < 85%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HIV-infected patients not on ART
  • Non-English speaking
  • Dementia (via mini mental status exam)
  • Incarceration
  • Legally blind and./or deaf
  • User of pillboxes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Beeper
Patients randomized to the control arm (Beeper) will receive the standard of care at each clinic visit. The subjects will bring their HIV medications every 3 weeks (MEMS measure, pill count) and questioned on their adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the past 7 days. They will not receive any text messages addressing their adherence to ART between each study visit. Their providers will not be receiving any adherence reports but will be asked to assess their adherence at at the start of the trial (Time 1 or T1) and at subsequent clinic visit scheduled according to a frequency defined by standard of care.
Device: Beeper
Beepers are handheld portable devices which can be attached to a belt. At regular intervals corresponding to the participant's preferred reminder time, they buzz for a few minutes or until the participant presses a button to stop the buzzing.
Other Names:
  • ALRT Med Reminder Model PC100
EXPERIMENTAL: Cell Phone
Participants will receive a text message reminder via ARemind at scheduled intervals, with varying frequency. They will also be subject to a remote adherence assessment, over text messages, interactive voice response (IVR), or a remote pill count with assistance over the phone from a counselor. Those who demonstrate lower adherence rates may receive a call from a counselor.
Device: ARemind
ARemind will personalize reminder messages based on adherence levels and facilitate patient phone calls with social workers/adherence counselors when appropriate. It will also consist of a text-messaging or interactive voice response (IVR) or phone-based pill count remote adherence assessment module.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to Anti-retroviral Therapy
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline and 8 timepoints (every 3 weeks) over 24 weeks. T1 (Baseline), T2 (12 weeks), and T3 (24 weeks) reported here.
MEMS pill caps or boxes will be used to monitor adherence. Each participant will place the drug containing the protease inhibitor, or, if no such drug is being taken, the drug with the highest dosing frequency, inside of a MEMS device, which automatically records each time the pillbox was opened. Participants will bring this to the clinic during their regularly scheduled visits, and those daily measurements will be downloaded to a clinic machine.
Assessed at Baseline and 8 timepoints (every 3 weeks) over 24 weeks. T1 (Baseline), T2 (12 weeks), and T3 (24 weeks) reported here.
Self-Report
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline and 8 timepoints (every 3 weeks) over 24 weeks. T1 (Baseline), T2 (12 weeks), and T3 (24 weeks) reported here.
Participants were asked to recall what pills they took and what they missed. Adherence was measured by self report as well as Wise Pill and pill count.
Assessed at Baseline and 8 timepoints (every 3 weeks) over 24 weeks. T1 (Baseline), T2 (12 weeks), and T3 (24 weeks) reported here.
Pill Count
Time Frame: Assessed at Baseline and 8 timepoints (every 3 weeks) over 24 weeks. T1 (Baseline), T2 (12 weeks), and T3 (24 weeks) reported here.
During the clinic visits ever 3 weeks over the course of the study, participants will be asked to bring all their pill bottles and count the contents of each bottle with assistance from the study coordinator. This count will be compared with the refill history for that patient from the pharmacy in order to get a sense of how many pills they have taken.
Assessed at Baseline and 8 timepoints (every 3 weeks) over 24 weeks. T1 (Baseline), T2 (12 weeks), and T3 (24 weeks) reported here.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dimagi Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
Boston University
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Boston Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Vikram S Kumar, M.D., Dimagi Inc.
  • Principal Investigator: Amy Baranoski, M.D., Boston Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 26, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 27, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 28, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2R44MH080655-02 (NIH)
  • R44MH080655 (NIH)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings