Vitamin D Supplementation for Treatment of Heart Failure (DELIGHTFUL)

September 28, 2016 updated by: Barry E. Bleske, University of Michigan

D suppLementation In HearT FaiLure (DELIGHTFUL)

The central objective of this proposal is to establish that vitamin D supplementation in heart failure patients with low vitamin D levels will have improved outcomes compared to placebo. In addition the investigators will also evaluate the role of genetics in regard to vitamin D and heart failure. The investigators will be evaluating what is currently a novel approach of identifying patients with low vitamin D and treating this low vitamin D level. The investigators will be able to evaluate the importance of vitamin D supplementation in these patients and the role of genetics on our defined outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Primary Objective To determine how rapid vitamin D supplementation affects biomarkers and submaximal exercise capacity in systolic HF patients with low vitamin D status.

Working Hypothesis 1: HF patients when supplemented with vitamin D for 6 months will have lower measures of inflammation and extracellular-matrix remodeling compared with placebo.

Working Hypothesis 2: HF patients when supplemented with vitamin D for 6 months will have longer 6-minute walk length compared with placebo.

Secondary Objectives To establish a relationship between the CYP2R1 variant and surrogate markers in systolic HF patients.

Working Hypothesis 3: HF patients with the CYP2R1 G allele will have higher measures of inflammation and extracellular-matrix remodeling compared to AA subjects. This relationship will also be seen in subjects with the CYP2R1 TagSNP variants.

Working Hypothesis 4: HF patients with CYP2R1 variant alleles will have shorter 6-minute walk length compared to subjects without these variants.

To genotype HF subjects for the VDR variants and additional tag SNPs, to ascertain the relationship between VDR genetic variation and surrogate markers in systolic HF patients.

Working Hypothesis 5: HF patients with VDR variants will have greater measures of inflammation and extracellular-matrix remodeling compared to subjects without VDR variants.

Working Hypothesis 6: HF patients with VDR variants will have a shorter 6-minute walk length compared to subjects without these variants.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
28

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HF patients with LV systolic dysfunction of ischemic or non-ischemic origin and an LVEF <40% using nuclear ventriculography or echocardiography within the last 6 months.
  • Attempts should have been made at optimizing medical therapy and the participant should be stable on these medications for at least 3 months.
  • Patients with a 25(OH)D level between 10-25 ng/ml

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Patients with sarcoidosis or other granulomatous disease that can alter vitamin D metabolism
  • Patients with primary valvular HF, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and drug-induced HF
  • Renal dysfunction defined as serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dl
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients <18 years of age
  • Patients on vitamin D supplementation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Vitamin D
Vitamin D supplementation will be an oral load of 100,000 IU then 2000 IU by mouth daily of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol)for 6 months
Drug: Vitamin D3
Vitamin D supplementation will be an oral load of 100,000 IU then 2000 IU by mouth daily of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol)for 6 months
Other Names:
  • cholecalciferol
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
A placebo loading dose will be given followed by two placebo tablets daily for 6 months.
Drug: Placebo
A placebo loading dose will be given followed by 2 placebo tablets daily for 6 months.
Other Names:
  • Sugar Pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomarkers
Time Frame: 6 months
Biomarkers - C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), propeptide procollagen type I, plasma procollagen III, matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), MMP-9 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1).
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exercise Capacity Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Quality of Life Measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire for quality of life is measured on a scale of 0 - 100, with 100 being best.
6 months
Vitamin D Genomics
Time Frame: Baseline
Genotyped for the restricted fragment length polymorphism at the BsmI site. In addition CYP2R1, CYP27B1, CYP24 will also be genotyped.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Michigan

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Barry E. Bleske, Pharm. D., University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 27, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 29, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 28, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • VitD3

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings