Product Performance of a Daily Disposable Contact Lens

August 13, 2019 updated by: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

A Study to Assess the Product Performance of a Daily Disposable Contact Lens

The objective of this one week, single group, bilateral, open-label study is to evaluate the product performance of the Bausch & Lomb daily disposable cosmetic tint contact lens (Test) when worn on a daily disposable basis by adapted current wearers of a marketed opaque tinted soft contact lens.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
212

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Singapore
      • Singapore, Singapore, 556741
        • Bausch & Lomb

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 38 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must be females of Chinese descent and of legal age and no older than 38. OR subjects that are females of Chinese descent and are at least 15 years of age and less than the legal age must: have a parent/legal guardian provide informed consent.
  • Subjects must have clear central corneas and be free of any anterior segment disorders.
  • Subjects must be adapted current wearers of marketed opaque tinted soft contact lenses, wear their lenses two days or more per week, and wear a lens in each eye.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have worn gas permeable (GP) contact lenses within the last 30 days or have worn polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) lenses within the last three months.
  • Subjects who have any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
  • Subjects using any systemic or topical medications that will, in the Investigator's opinion, affect ocular physiology or lens performance.
  • Subjects with an active ocular disease or are using any ocular medication.
  • Subjects with any scar or neovascularization within the central 4 mm of the cornea.
  • Subjects who are aphakic or amblyopic.
  • Subjects who have had any corneal surgery (eg, refractive surgery).
  • Subjects who currently wear monovision, multifocal, or toric contact lenses.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Prism I
Bausch & Lomb daily disposable cosmetic tint contact lens
Device: Daily disposable cosmetic tint lens
Bausch & Lomb daily disposable cosmetic tint contact lens worn on a daily disposable basis for 1 week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Market Research Survey
Time Frame: 1 week
Online subjective assessments that subjects responded to after wearing the study lenses for at least one week. Subjects were asked to rate their overall opinion as: Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, or Poor.
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lens Evaluation - Centration
Time Frame: Over all study visits through 1 week
To determine proper lens parameters the lens relationship to the eye was observed using a slit lamp. Lens centration, meaning the lens should provide full corneal coverage, was assessed during the slit lamp evaluation. Findings were reported as: Excellent, Good, Fair, or Poor.
Over all study visits through 1 week
Lens Evaluation - Movement
Time Frame: Over all study visits through 1 week

To determine proper lens parameters the lens relationship to the eye was observed using a slit lamp. Lens movement, meaning the lens should provide discernible movement with:

  • Primary gaze blink
  • Upgaze blink
  • Upgaze lag was assessed during the slit lamp evaluation. Findings were reported as: Adequate, Excessive, Insufficient, Adherence.
Over all study visits through 1 week
Visual Acuity - Distance High Contrast logMAR (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) Lens Visual Acuity (VA).
Time Frame: Over all study visits for 1 week
For determination of high contrast VA, the subject was to be seated so that the distance from the subject's eyes to the logMAR chart is 6.5 feet (2.0 meters). The chart should be at eye level for the subject. The logMAR charts have two alternative letter sequences from 28 letters (0.3 logMAR) to 62 letters (-0.3 logMAR). The visual acuity should be measured through the phoropter using the distance refractive correction with the addition of +0.50D to compensate for the reduced test distance of 6.5 feet (2.0 meters).
Over all study visits for 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 27, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 29, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 13, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 654

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on Daily disposable cosmetic tint lens

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings