A Comparison of Visual Function After Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses (IOLs)

May 31, 2018 updated by: Alcon Research

A Randomized, Subject-Masked Comparison of Visual Function After Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs

The purpose of this study is to evaluate visual and refractive parameters in a series of subjects bilaterally implanted with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) during cataract surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Each subject completed a preoperative examination of both eyes, implantation of IOL at the operative visit for each eye, and up to 4 postoperative visits (each eye examined at Day 1-2, with binocular visits at Month 1 and Month 3 after the second implantation). The second implantation occurred within 30 days of the first.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
31

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sign informed consent;
  • Able to attend postoperative examinations per protocol schedule;
  • Diagnosed with bilateral cataracts;
  • Planned cataract removal by phacoemulsification with implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL);
  • Preoperative astigmatism ≤ 2.5 diopter;
  • Good ocular health, with the exception of cataracts;
  • Free of disease(s)/condition(s) listed in the "Caution" section of the AcrySof IQ and Acri.LISA package inserts;
  • Able to undergo second eye surgery within one month of the first eye surgery;
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous corneal surgery;
  • Planned multiple procedures during cataract/IOL implantation surgery;
  • Any ocular disease and/or condition that may compromise study results;
  • Pregnant or planning pregnancy during course of study;
  • History of corneal disease (e.g., herpes simplex, herpes zoster keratitis, etc.)
  • Diabetic retinopathy;
  • Macular degeneration;
  • History of retinal detachment;
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: ReSTOR +3
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal IOL Model SN6AD1 or AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL Model SND1TT, lens assignment and model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation
Device: AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal IOL Model SN6AD1
Multifocal IOL implanted for long-term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient
Device: AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL Model SND1TT
Multifocal IOL with extended secondary focal point and astigmatism correction implanted for long-term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient
Other Names:
  • Models SND1T2, SND1T3, SND1T4, SND1T5, SND1T6
Active Comparator: Acri.LISA
Acri.LISA® 366D IOL or Acri.LISA® 466TD Toric IOL, lens assignment determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation
Device: Acri.LISA® 366D IOL
Aspheric diffractive IOL with +3.75 D add power implanted for long-term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient
Device: Acri.LISA® 466TD Toric IOL
Aspheric diffractive IOL with +3.75 D add power and astigmatism correction implanted for long-term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Binocular Defocus VA at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3 from second eye implantation
Defocus VA (an indicator of the expected range of vision with a presbyopia-correcting IOL) was tested binocularly with the participant's best spectacle correction using a chart. Lenses of different spherical powers were placed in front of the eyes to produce varying levels of defocus. The VA at each spherical power was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Month 3 from second eye implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Across a Range of Distances at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3 from second eye implantation
Visual acuity (VA) was tested binocularly (both eyes together) with correction in place if needed across a range of distances under well-lit conditions using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Month 3 from second eye implantation
Uncorrected Visual Acuity Across a Range of Distances at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3 from second eye implantation
VA was tested binocularly unaided across a range of distances under well-lit conditions using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Month 3 from second eye implantation
Mean Refractive Spherical Equivalent at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3 from second eye implantation
A manifest refraction (vision check) was performed using a 100% contrast ETDRS chart under well-lit conditions. Results were documented for sphere, cylinder and axis readings. The refractive spherical equivalent was calculated according to the formula: sphere + ½ cylinder power. Both eyes contributed to the mean.
Month 3 from second eye implantation
Mean Radner Reading Speed
Time Frame: Month 3 from second eye implantation
Reading performance was measured using the Radner Reading Chart with no correction (without) and with best distance corrective aids (with). Reading speed was measured in words per minute.
Month 3 from second eye implantation
Patient Reported Outcomes at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3 from second eye implantation
The Visual Task Difficulty Assessment (VISTAS) questionnaire was completed by the subject to assess difficulty in completing everyday tasks that depend on good vision. Tasks were rated using a 1 to 5 point scale, where 1 = no difficulty; 2 = minor difficulty; 3 = moderate difficulty; 4 = major difficulty; 5 = cannot accomplish. Individual scores for each task were averaged to obtain the overall score for each vision type/function. Near vision was defined as less than 50 cm; intermediate vision as 50 cm to 1 m; extended intermediate vision as 90 cm to 4 m; and distant vision as more than 4 m.
Month 3 from second eye implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Alcon Research

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Brand Lead, Surgical, Global Medical Affairs, Alcon Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 8, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 8, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 9, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 31, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • M09-051

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings