Low Dose Peri-operative IV Ketamine for Chronic Post-surgery Pain Prevention

August 22, 2019 updated by: Gillian Chumbley, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

A Double-blind, Randomised Placebo-controlled Trial to Determine Whether Low-dose Intravenous Ketamine Peri-operatively Can Prevent Chronic Post-surgical Pain, in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy or Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS)

This study will test the null hypothesis that low-dose ketamine given peri-operatively will have no effect on the development of chronic post-surgical pain, in patients undergoing thoracotomy or video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) procedures

A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial will be used to test the null hypothesis. Potential participants due to undergo either thoracotomy or video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) will be identified by the collaborating thoracic surgeons in the out-patient department. Patients will be sent information about the study by post, prior to admission for surgery. If they are willing to participate, written consent will be sought on the ward preoperatively, where they will complete baseline measures of pain.

Patients will be randomised to receive an intravenous infusion of placebo (saline) or ketamine running at 0.1mg/kg/hour, starting 10 minutes prior to the surgical incision and continuing for the first three postoperative days (96 hours in total). Prior to starting the infusion a loading dose of ketamine (0.1 mg per kg) will be administered.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study will test the null hypothesis that low-dose ketamine given peri-operatively will have no effect on the development of chronic post-surgical pain, in patients undergoing thoracotomy or video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) procedures

A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial will be used to test the null hypothesis. Potential participants due to undergo either thoracotomy or video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) will be identified by the collaborating thoracic surgeons in the out-patient department. Patients will be sent information about the study by post, prior to admission for surgery. If they are willing to participate, written consent will be sought on the ward preoperatively, where they will complete baseline measures of pain.

Patients will be randomised to receive an intravenous infusion of placebo (saline) or ketamine running at 0.1mg/kg/hour, starting 10 minutes prior to the surgical incision and continuing for the first three postoperative days (96 hours in total). Prior to starting the infusion a loading dose of ketamine (0.1 mg per kg) will be administered. All staff, including the anaesthetist, surgical team, ward nurses and the principal investigator will be blind to the treatment given throughout the study. The key to the randomisation will be revealed at the end of the study.

Patients will be asked to complete a numeric pain score (NPS) and standard pain questionnaires which includes the Brief Pain Inventory [BPI], short form Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs [S-LANSS]) prior to surgery, then at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. The surgical area will also be examined at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months for signs of neuropathic or nerve pain. Whilst in hospital patients will be asked to score their pain daily, on a numeric pain scale of 0 to 10. Consumption of morphine and side-effects will be recorded.

Patients will receive standard post-operative analgesia.

A sample size calculation based on a previous study, to detect a reduction in pain of 2 points the 10 point numeric pain scale at the 6 week assessment, with α = 5%, 1 - β = 90% and a bilateral hypothesis, would require a sample size of 36 per group, 72 patients in total. This will require a total study population of 144 patients, as both video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy patients will be studied.

A two samples t-test will be used to compare the numeric pain scores between the ketamine and placebo groups at each time point. If these data are not normally distributed then the Mann Whitney test will be used. The scores from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and short form Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) will be analysed in the same manner. The Chi Squared test will be used to compare dichotomous data, such as the incidence of side-effects.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
77

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom, W2 1NY
        • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult patients (18 years and above) who are undergoing either thoracotomy or video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).
  • Participants must be able to understand English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • History of previous chronic thoracic pain
  • Neuropathic pain (whatever the site), existing at time of recruitment
  • Pre-operative analgesic treatments which include the following medications: strong opioids (step 3 analgesics), tricyclic antidepressants, venlafaxine, gabapentin, pregabalin, duloxetine, clonazepam or carbamazepine.
  • Allergy to bupivacaine, morphine, paracetamol, tramadol, dihydrocodeine or ketamine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Saline
Patients will receive a placebo infusion of 0.9% sodium chloride, which will start 10 minutes prior to the start of the operation and continue for 96 hours.
Experimental: ketamine
Patients will receive intravenous ketamine, starting 10 minutes prior to surgery and will continue for 96 hours
Drug: Ketamine
Intravenous infusion of ketamine starting 10 minutes prior to surgery and running for 96 hours, which will be administered at a rate of 0.1mg/kg/hour. A loading dose of 0.1mg/kg will be administered prior to the start of the infusion
Other Names:
  • Ketalar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Score on Moving at 6 Weeks
Time Frame: 6 weeks after surgery

Measures in pain include:

Numeric pain score of 0 to 10. Zero denotes 'no pain'; 10 denotes 'pain as bad as you can imagine'
6 weeks after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analgesic Consumption (Opioid)
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 month, 6 month
Analgesia consumption will be measured post-operatively and at 6 weeks
6 weeks, 3 month, 6 month
Sensory Testing
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

Hypoaesthesia: light touch of the blunt end of a paintbrush was felt less precisely, than in healthy tissue.

Hyperalgesia: the pain induced by a sterile neurotip, applied perpendicular to the skin is felt abnormally strongly, in comparison to the contralateral side.

Static allodynia: the application of a Von Frey hair number 14. (8g) was unpleasant, in comparison to the contralateral side.

Dynamic allodynia: three successive gentle strokes of an 8 mm-wide paintbrush over a 40 mm distance, is unpleasant, in comparison to the contralateral side.
6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
Incidence of Side-effects, Nausea
Time Frame: 108 hours
The presence of nausea recorded at the above time points
108 hours
Incidence of Side Effect, Vomiting
Time Frame: 108 hours
The presence of vomiting recorded at the above time points
108 hours
Incidence of Side Effect, Lightheaded
Time Frame: 108 hours
The presence of lightheaded recorded at the above time points
108 hours
Incidence of Side Effect, Vivid Dreams
Time Frame: 108 hours
The presence of vivid dreams recorded at the above time points
108 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gillian M Chumbley, BSc, PhD, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 31, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 15, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 22, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Chumbley1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Ketamine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings