Open-label Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of CDP6038 (Olokizumab) in Patients Who Completed RA0056

March 18, 2022 updated by: UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-Label, Follow-up Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of CDP6038 (Olokizumab) Administered Subcutaneously to Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Completed Study RA0056

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term safety and tolerability of CDP6038 (olokizumab) treatment in adult subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis who completed study RA0056 (NCT01242488).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Male and female subjects were randomized in a multi-center, open-label, follow-up study to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of a subcutaneous dose of 120 mg CDP6038 (olokizumab), every two weeks, for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
190

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • 401
      • Liege, Belgium
        • 400
  • United Kingdom
      • Essex, United Kingdom
        • 206
      • Southampton, United Kingdom
        • 208
      • Torquay, United Kingdom
        • 209
  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States
        • 166
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
        • 154
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
        • 118
    • Arkansas
      • Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
        • 103
    • California
      • Covina, California, United States
        • 127
      • La Jolla, California, United States
        • 148
      • Long Beach, California, United States
        • 184
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
        • 177
      • Palo Alto, California, United States
        • 104
      • Santa Maria, California, United States
        • 129
      • Upland, California, United States
        • 164
    • Connecticut
      • Hamden, Connecticut, United States
        • 141
    • Delaware
      • Lewes, Delaware, United States
        • 111
    • Florida
      • DeBary, Florida, United States
        • 151
      • Jupiter, Florida, United States
        • 114
      • Tampa, Florida, United States
        • 157
      • Tampa, Florida, United States
        • 183
    • Idaho
      • Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
        • 116
    • Illinois
      • Moline, Illinois, United States
        • 160
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States
        • 168
    • Iowa
      • Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States
        • 133
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States
        • 172
    • Michigan
      • Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, United States
        • 185
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
        • 112
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
        • 134
    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
        • 102
    • New Jersey
      • Freehold, New Jersey, United States
        • 171
      • Toms River, New Jersey, United States
        • 152
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States
        • 174
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
        • 170
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
        • 150
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States
        • 100
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
        • 110
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
        • 165
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States
        • 105
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States
        • 135
      • Dallas, Texas, United States
        • 128
      • Houston, Texas, United States
        • 126
      • Houston, Texas, United States
        • 132
      • Houston, Texas, United States
        • 138
      • Houston, Texas, United States
        • 181
      • Mesquite, Texas, United States
        • 145
      • Nassau Bay, Texas, United States
        • 143
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
        • 122
      • Tomball, Texas, United States
        • 144
      • Victoria, Texas, United States
        • 142
    • Virginia
      • Chesapeake, Virginia, United States
        • 139
    • Washington
      • Tacoma, Washington, United States
        • 175
    • West Virginia
      • Beckley, West Virginia, United States
        • 136
      • Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States
        • 167

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject completed the RA0056 study (Week 12 Visit)
  • Subject must have maintained their stable dose (and route) of methotrexate (MTX) between 12.5 to 25mg/week in RA0056, and plan to maintain this same dose and route of administration for at least 12 weeks
  • Female subjects must be either postmenopausal for at least 1 year, surgically incapable of childbearing, or effectively practicing an acceptable method of contraception (either oral/parenteral/implantable hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device, or barrier and spermicide). Abstinence is not considered an acceptable method of contraception for this study
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to use 2 methods of adequate contraception during the study and for 6 months (24 weeks) after their last CDP6038 (olokizumab) dose
  • Male subjects must agree to ensure that they or their female partner(s) use adequate contraception during the study and for 12 weeks after the subject receives their last dose of CDP6038 (olokizumab)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has an ongoing serious adverse event from the RA0056 study
  • Female subject of childbearing potential has a positive pregnancy test at Week 12 in Study RA0056 or plans to become pregnant during the study or within 6 months (24 weeks) following their last dose of study medication
  • Subject has evidence of active or latent tuberculosis
  • Subject is receiving any biologic response modifier or synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug other than MTX
  • Subject has an alcohol consumption of more than 1 unit per weekday. One unit equals 1 glass of beer or lager (~330mL), a glass of wine (125mL), or a measure of spirits/hard liquor (25mL)
  • Subject with any other condition in RA0056 (eg, clinically significant laboratory values, frequent adverse events) which in the Investigator's or Sponsor's judgment would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CDP6038 (olokizumab)
Biological: CDP6038 (olokizumab)
100mg/ml solution for injection 120 mg subcutaneously (sc) every 2 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0057) until 30 days after the last dose (maximum up to 780 days)
Reported TEAEs included adverse events that started or worsened after the first dose of CDP6038 (olokizumab) in Study RA0057 and within 30 days after the last dose.
From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0057) until 30 days after the last dose (maximum up to 780 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) in the Disease Activity Score-28-joint Count (C-reactive Protein) (DAS28[CRP]) to Week 12 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 12 (Study RA0057)
DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the tender/painful joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) from 28 joints, the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA)-Visual Analog Scale (VAS), andCRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 * (TJC)^1/2 + 0.28 * (SJC)^1/2 + 0.36 * ln(CRP[mg/L]+1) + 0.014 * PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change in DAS28(CRP) score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 12 (Study RA0057)
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) in DAS28(CRP) to Week 24 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 24 (Study RA0057)
DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, and CRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 * (TJC)^1/2 + 0.28 * (SJC)^1/2 + 0.36 * ln(CRP[mg/L]+1) + 0.014 * PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change in DAS28(CRP) score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 24 (Study RA0057)
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) in DAS28(CRP) to Week 48 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 48 (Study RA0057)
DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, and CRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 * (TJC)^1/2 + 0.28 * (SJC)^1/2 + 0.36 * ln(CRP[mg/L]+1) + 0.014 * PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change in DAS28(CRP) score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 48 (Study RA0057)
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) in DAS28(CRP) to Week 96 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 96 (Study RA0057)
DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, and CRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 * (TJC)^1/2 + 0.28 * (SJC)^1/2 + 0.36 * ln(CRP[mg/L]+1) + 0.014 * PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change in DAS28(CRP) score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 96 (Study RA0057)
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20) Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) to Week 12 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 12 (Study RA0057)
ACR20 represents at least 20% improvement from Baseline for each of TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + at least 3 components of 5 for: PtGADA-VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA)-VAS, Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PAAP)-VAS, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores indicates less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 12 (Study RA0057)
The ACR20 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) to Week 24 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 24 (Study RA0057)
ACR20 represents at least 20% improvement from Baseline for each of TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + at least 3 components of 5 for: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores indicates less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 24 (Study RA0057)
The ACR20 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) to Week 48 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 48 (Study RA0057)
ACR20 represents at least 20% improvement from Baseline for each of TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + at least 3 components of 5 for: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores indicates less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 48 (Study RA0057)
The ACR20 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) to Week 96 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 96 (Study RA0057)
ACR20 represents at least 20% improvement from Baseline for each of TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + at least 3 components of 5 for: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores indicates less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 96 (Study RA0057)
The ACR 50% (ACR50) Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) to Week 12 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 12 (Study RA0057)
ACR50 represents at least 50% improvement from Baseline for each of TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + at least 3 components of 5 for: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores indicates less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 12 (Study RA0057)
The ACR50 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) to Week 24 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 24 (Study RA0057)
ACR50 represents at least 50% improvement from Baseline for each of TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + at least 3 components of 5 for: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores indicates less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 24 (Study RA0057)
The ACR50 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) to Week 48 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 48 (Study RA0057)
ACR50 represents at least 50% improvement from Baseline for each of TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + at least 3 components of 5 for: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 48 (Study RA0057)
The ACR50 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) to Week 96 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 96 (Study RA0057)
ACR50 represents at least 50% improvement from Baseline for each of TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + at least 3 components of 5 for: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores indicates less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 96 (Study RA0057)
The ACR 70% (ACR70) Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) to Week 12 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 12 (Study RA0057)
ACR70 represents at least 70% improvement from Baseline for each of TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + at least 3 components of 5 for: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores indicates less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 12 (Study RA0057)
The ACR70 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) to Week 24 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 24 (Study RA0057)
ACR70 represents at least 70% improvement from Baseline for each of TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + at least 3 components of 5 for: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores indicates less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 24 (Study RA0057)
The ACR70 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) to Week 48 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 48 (Study RA0057)
ACR70 represents at least 70% improvement from Baseline for each of TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + at least 3 components of 5 for: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores indicates less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 48 (Study RA0057)
The ACR70 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) to Week 96 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 96 (Study RA0057)
ACR70 represents at least 70% improvement from Baseline for each of TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + at least 3 components of 5 for: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores indicates less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) up to Week 96 (Study RA0057)
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) <2.6 at Week 12 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Week 12 (Study RA0057)
DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, and CRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 * (TJC)^1/2 + 0.28 * (SJC)^1/2 + 0.36 * ln(CRP[mg/L]+1) + 0.014 * PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than 2.6 implies remission.
Week 12 (Study RA0057)
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) <2.6 at Week 24 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Week 24 (Study RA0057)
DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, and CRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 * (TJC)^1/2 + 0.28 * (SJC)^1/2 + 0.36 * ln(CRP[mg/L]+1) + 0.014 * PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than 2.6 implies remission.
Week 24 (Study RA0057)
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) <2.6 at Week 48 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Week 48 (Study RA0057)
DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, and CRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 * (TJC)^1/2 + 0.28 * (SJC)^1/2 + 0.36 * ln(CRP[mg/L]+1) + 0.014 * PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than 2.6 implies remission.
Week 48 (Study RA0057)
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) <2.6 at Week 96 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Week 96 (Study RA0057)
DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, and CRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 * (TJC)^1/2 + 0.28 * (SJC)^1/2 + 0.36 * ln(CRP[mg/L]+1) + 0.014 * PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than 2.6 implies remission.
Week 96 (Study RA0057)
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 at Week 12 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Week 12 (Study RA0057)
DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, and CRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 * (TJC)^1/2 + 0.28 * (SJC)^1/2 + 0.36 * ln(CRP[mg/L]+1) + 0.014 * PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implies low disease activity.
Week 12 (Study RA0057)
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 at Week 24 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Week 24 (Study RA0057)
DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, and CRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 * (TJC)^1/2 + 0.28 * (SJC)^1/2 + 0.36 * ln(CRP[mg/L]+1) + 0.014 * PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score <=3.2 implies low disease activity.
Week 24 (Study RA0057)
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 at Week 48 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Week 48 (Study RA0057)
DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, and CRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 * (TJC)^1/2 + 0.28 * (SJC)^1/2 + 0.36 * ln(CRP[mg/L]+1) + 0.014 * PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score <=3.2 implies low disease activity.
Week 48 (Study RA0057)
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 at Week 96 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Week 96 (Study RA0057)
DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, and CRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 * (TJC)^1/2 + 0.28 * (SJC)^1/2 + 0.36 * ln(CRP[mg/L]+1) + 0.014 * PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score <=3.2 implies low disease activity.
Week 96 (Study RA0057)
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) in the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) to Week 48 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 48 (Study RA0057)
CDAI was calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PtGADA-VAS and PhGADA-VAS, according to the following formula: SJC + TJC + PtGADA + PhGADA Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities; 100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Total score range is from 0-100, with the high scores representing high disease activity. A negative change in CDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 48 (Study RA0057)
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) in the CDAI to Week 96 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 96 (Study RA0057)
CDAI was calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PtGADA-VAS and PhGADA-VAS, according to the following formula: SJC + TJC + PtGADA + PhGADA Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities; 100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. Total score range is from 0-100, with the high scores representing high disease activity. A negative change in CDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 96 (Study RA0057)
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) in the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) to Week 48 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 48 (Study RA0057)
SDAI was calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS and CRP (in milligrams per decilitre [mg/dL]), according to the following formula: SJC + TJC + PtGADA + PhGADA + CRP (mg/dL) Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities; 100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). • CRP range was from 0 to 10 mg/dL. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease. A negative change in SDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 48 (Study RA0057)
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) in the SDAI to Week 96 of Study RA0057
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 96 (Study RA0057)
SDAI was calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS and CRP (in milligrams per decilitre [mg/dL]), according to the following formula: SJC + TJC + PtGADA + PhGADA + CRP (mg/dL) Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities; 100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). • CRP range was from 0 to 10 mg/dL. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands; and the knees. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease. A negative change in SDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0056) and Week 96 (Study RA0057)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
R-Pharm

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Genovese, Dr, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 7, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 5, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 14, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 15, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 18, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RA0057
  • 2010-022224-77 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings