Open Label Extension Study of Conatumumab and Ganitumab (AMG 479)

February 3, 2021 updated by: Amgen

A Phase 2 Open Label Extension Study of Conatumumab and AMG 479

The purpose of this protocol is to allow continued treatment with conatumumab and/or ganitumab, with or without chemotherapy, to participants who completed a separate Amgen-sponsored conatumumab or ganitumab study without disease progression whose previous studies were closed.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Poland
      • Szczecin, Poland, 70-891
        • Research Site
  • Spain
    • Cataluña
      • Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain, 08035
        • Research Site
  • United States
    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • Research Site
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093-0957
        • Research Site
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80218
        • Research Site
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • Research Site
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Research Site
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Research Site
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38120
        • Research Site
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Research Site
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Research Site
    • Utah
      • Ogden, Utah, United States, 84403
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be enrolled in this study, subjects must be currently enrolled in a prior Amgen-sponsored conatumumab or AMG 479 study and are eligible according to the parent study to receive their next dose of conatumumab (with or without co-therapy), or AMG 479 alone.

Subjects must have their eligibility assessed for this study and be enrolled within 30 days of their last treatment on the parent protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Discontinued from a conatumumab study due to an adverse event considered by the investigator to be related to conatumumab treatment, including intolerance to conatumumab
  • Subjects determined to have disease progression during their participation in the parent Amgen study
  • Woman or man with partner of childbearing potential not consenting to use adequate contraceptive precautions ie, double barrier contraceptive methods (eg, diaphragm plus condom), or abstinence during the course of the study and for 6 months after the last dose of protocol-specified therapy administration
  • Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant within 6 months after the last dose of protocol-specified therapy administration
  • Male subject with a pregnant partner who is not willing to use a condom during treatment and for an additional 6 months after the last dose of protocol-specified therapy administration
  • Subject has previously entered this study
  • Subject will not be available for protocol required study visits, to the best of the subject and investigator's knowledge
  • Subject has any kind of disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or to comply with all required study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Conatumumab Monotherapy
Participants will continue to receive conatumumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) or every 3 weeks (Q3W) at the same dose and regimen as at the conclusion of the parent study.
Biological: Conatumumab
Administered by intravenous infusion Q2W or Q3W.
Other Names:
  • AMG 655
Experimental: Conatumumab + Ganitumab
Participants will receive conatumumab and ganitumab by intravenous infusion at the same dose and regimen as at the conclusion of the parent study.
Biological: Conatumumab
Administered by intravenous infusion Q2W or Q3W.
Other Names:
  • AMG 655
Biological: Ganitumab
Administered by intravenous infusion Q3W or Q4W.
Other Names:
  • AMG 479
Experimental: Ganitumab Monotherapy
Participants will continue to receive ganitumab Q3W or every 4 weeks (Q4W) at the same dose and regimen as at the conclusion of the parent study.
Biological: Ganitumab
Administered by intravenous infusion Q3W or Q4W.
Other Names:
  • AMG 479
Experimental: Conatumumab + mFOLFOX6 ± Bevacizumab
Participants will continue to receive conatumumab by intravenous infusion in addition to modified FOLFOX6 chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab.
Biological: Conatumumab
Administered by intravenous infusion Q2W or Q3W.
Other Names:
  • AMG 655
Drug: Modified FOLFOX6
The mFOLFOX6 regimen is a combination therapy of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² administered as a 2-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on day 1 and leucovorin 400 mg/m² racemate or 200 mg/m² levo-leucovorin administered as a 2-hour infusion on day 1, followed by a loading dose of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m² IV bolus administered on day 1, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m² via ambulatory pump administered for a period of 46 to 48 hours every 14 days.
Other Names:
  • Oxaliplatin-Leucovorin-Fluorouracil chemotherapy
Biological: Bevacizumab
Administered at a dose of 5 mg/kg by intravenous infusion on day 1 of each 14 day cycle.
Other Names:
  • Avastin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug in the extension study to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, including worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment.
From first dose of study drug in the extension study to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug in the extension study to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.

A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria:

  • fatal,
  • life threatening (places the participant at immediate risk of death),
  • required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization,
  • resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity,
  • congenital anomaly/birth defect, and/or
  • other medically important serious event.
From first dose of study drug in the extension study to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline and day 1 of each treatment cycle (every 2, 3, or 4 weeks depending on dosing schedule) up to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.
Maximum change from baseline is defined for each participant as the maximum change from baseline value observed across all visits.
Baseline and day 1 of each treatment cycle (every 2, 3, or 4 weeks depending on dosing schedule) up to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.
Minimum Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline and day 1 of each treatment cycle (every 2, 3, or 4 weeks depending on dosing schedule) up to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.
Minimum change from baseline is defined for each participant as the minimum change from baseline value observed across all visits.
Baseline and day 1 of each treatment cycle (every 2, 3, or 4 weeks depending on dosing schedule) up to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.
Number of Participants With CTCAE Grade 3 or Higher Clinical Laboratory Toxicities
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug in the extension study to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.
Laboratory toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0.
From first dose of study drug in the extension study to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.
Best Overall Response
Time Frame: Approximately every 6 months until end of treatment; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.
Radiological assessments to evaluate disease extent (with change compared to nadir from the parent protocol) were performed at regular intervals, at a minimum once every 6 months or more frequently if clinically indicated (starting from their last scan on the parent protocol), per standard of care (SOC) at each facility. Tumor response was assessed by the Investigator as either complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease.
Approximately every 6 months until end of treatment; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.
Number of Participants With Disease Progression or Death Due to Disease Progression
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug in the extension study to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.
From first dose of study drug in the extension study to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment with conatumumab was 1190.5 days and 1163.0 days for ganitumab.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Amgen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 3, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 5, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 3, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 31, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 1, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20101116
  • 2010-022270-14 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the URL below.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings