Evaluation of an 3D Imaging Intensifier Coupled to a Navigation Station in the Surgery of the Spine and Pelvis (FLUORONAV)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Grenoble, France
- Clinical Investigation Center - Technological Innovation - Inserm 803 - University Hospital France
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient aged over 18 years old
- Patient affiliated to social security or similarly regime
- Patient with a disease of the pelvic ring, with an indication of establishment of a screw sacro-iliac
- Patient with a disease of the spine, with an indication of establishment of pedicle implant
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intubated patient resuscitation
- Pregnant women and lactating mothers
- Adult unable to express their consent
- Ward of court or under guardianship
- Person under legal protection
- Person deprived of freedom by judicial or administrative decision
- Person hospitalized without their consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 3D fluoroscopy and navigation station
|
After randomization, patients will be operated with the conventional method either with navigation station.
In the conventional method, the orthopedic surgeon based on anatomical criteria to establish its implants.
It uses an image intensifier in 2D mode to monitor the implementation of the implants.
In computer assisted surgery, the surgeon uses a navigation station that allows real-time flow instruments to guide its implementation of the implants.
It uses an image intensifier in 3D mode on the one hand to achieve a first series of image that will be used for navigation and also to monitor the implementation of the implants.
|
|
Active Comparator: 2D and anatomical landmarks
|
After randomization, patients will be operated with the conventional method either with navigation station.
In the conventional method, the orthopedic surgeon based on anatomical criteria to establish its implants.
It uses an image intensifier in 2D mode to monitor the implementation of the implants.
In computer assisted surgery, the surgeon uses a navigation station that allows real-time flow instruments to guide its implementation of the implants.
It uses an image intensifier in 3D mode on the one hand to achieve a first series of image that will be used for navigation and also to monitor the implementation of the implants.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Reading number of trips extra-pedicular or extra bone in both groups on a postoperative TDM
Time Frame: two years
|
two years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
measure radiation of the surgeon and the patient in the two groups
Time Frame: two years
|
delivered dose and irradiation time during the duration of the intervention for the sacro-iliac screw connections, or for the establishment of two pedicle screws in spinal surgery over a 2-D amplifier
|
two years
|
|
Show that the operative time is not increased significantly taking into account the learning curve and the benefit provided from a conventional 2-D amplifier
Time Frame: two years
|
comparison of operating times of interventions between "3D-navigation" and conventional methods
|
two years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Philippe Merloz, Pr, University Hospital, Grenoble
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DCIC-10 25
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.