The Effects of a Stainless Steel Suture MGH Flexor Tendon Repair Coupled With Early Aggressive Range of Motion Rehabilitation: a Randomized Controlled Trial

April 28, 2011 updated by: University of Manitoba

A Pilot Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Stainless Steel Suture Repair Coupled With Aggressive Post-Operative Rehabilitation to Polypropylene Suture Paired With Active Range of Motion Rehabilitation

The investigators are comparing the combination of a stainless steel repair and aggressive early active range of motion rehabilitation protocol for flexor tendon lacerations in the hand with a current, accepted treatment offered at our institution. Outcomes to be assessed will be time to return to work, joint range of motion in the injured fingers, and any potential complications that may arise (ex: surgical infections or repair rupture). All proposed treatments included in this study are currently being offered at our institution, but not in a randomized fashion.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study will serve as a pilot-study for a future randomized controlled trial. Adult patients with zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations of the hand (anatomically from the A1 pulley of the hand to the insertion of the flexor digitorum superficialis) who have presented to the emergency room acutely (within 1 week of injury) at the Health Sciences Center in Winnipeg will be asked for their participation in this study. Consent will be obtained by a plastic surgery resident either in the emergency room or in the plastic surgency emergency decanting clinic. The investigators will include twenty-four patients in the study, randomized into one of two treatment groups (groups A and B) by block randomization. Randomization will be done once patients agree to participate in the study. All patients will be booked for surgery on the emergency slate. Each treatment group will be treated by a single surgeon who is an expert at treatment of these injuries. Group A patients will have their laceration(s) repaired using a modified Becker repair technique using stainless steel suture in the operating room, and then will proceed to undergo an aggressive early active range of motion rehabilitation administered by the hand therapists at HSC. Group B patients will undergo a double-locking loop suture repair using polypropylene. They will then undergo a less aggressive active range of motion rehabilitation protocol which is currently offered to patients at our center. Follow-up will occur in plastic surgery outpatient clinic at post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12. Follow-up with hand therapy will be at the discretion of the therapists. At each visit with hand therapy, joint range of motion will be assessed at the PIP and DIP joints in the affected fingers. Final range of motion will be assessed using the Strickland system for evaluating flexor tendon surgery outcomes, and will be done by a blinded hand therapist.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A 1R9
        • Health Sciences Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults
  • living in Winnipeg, Manitoba
  • zone II flexor tendon lacerations in a single finger
  • able to consent to and comply with surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • crush injuries
  • vascular injuries requiring re-vascularization
  • fractures
  • infection
  • prior hand injury requiring surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Stainless steel MGH
Patients in this study arm will have their flexor tendon laceration repaired using stainless steel suture (size 3-0) in an MGH repair technique. They will then undergo aggressive early active range of motion rehabilitation post-operatively.
Procedure: Stainless steel suture
Stainless steel suture material will be used (size 3-0) in an MGH repair technique
Behavioral: Aggressive early active range of motion rehabilitation
Patients undergoing this form of rehabilitation will have their splints discontinued at 4 weeks and ideally will be back at work at normal duties by 6 weeks. This rehabilitation uses more movement at a faster progression than other early active range of motion protocols.
Active Comparator: Polypropylene DOLL
Patients in this study arm will have their flexor tendon laceration repaired using polypropylene suture (size 3-0) in a double-locking loop repair technique. They will then undergo aggressive early active range of motion rehabilitation post-operatively.
Procedure: Polypropylene suture
Polypropylene suture (size 3-0) will be used in a double-locking loop repair technique
Behavioral: Early active range of motion rehabilitation
Patients undergoing this form of rehabilitation will have their splints discontinued at 6 weeks and ideally will be back at work at normal duties by 10-12 weeks. This rehabilitation uses less movement at a slower progression than the early AROM rehabilitation protocol specified in the experimental group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Return to work
Time Frame: Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
At each clinic visit at the above mentioned time periods, the clinician will ask the patient if they have returned to work (if applicable)
Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
Finger joint range of motion (PIP, DIP, MCP)
Time Frame: Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
At each clinic / occupational therapy visit, a blinded assessor will determine the total range of motion of the finger DIP, PIP and MCP joints
Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compliance with therapy
Time Frame: Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
At each clinic and occupational therapy visit, an assessor will ask the patient if they have been compliant with therapy
Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
Rupture
Time Frame: Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
At each follow-up visit with the clinician or occupational therapist, the presence of a rupture will be assessed for clinically. Alternatively this will be recorded if the patient presents to the emergency room with a flexor tendon rupture
Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
Infection
Time Frame: Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
At each clinic visit, the patient will be assessed clinically for the presence or absence of an infection. This will also be noted if the patient presents to the emergency room.
Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
Attendance with follow-up clinic and occupational therapy
Time Frame: Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
The patient's attendance will be determined at each clinic or occupational therapy visit.
Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
Use of oral analgesics
Time Frame: Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
At each clinic visit, the patient will be asked if they are still using oral analgesics
Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
Oral antibiotic usage
Time Frame: Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
At each clinic visit, the patient will be asked if they are using oral antibiotics.
Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
Wound dehiscence (breakdown)
Time Frame: Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
At each clinic and occupational therapy visit, the patient will be assessed to determine if a wound dehiscence (breakdown) has occurred.
Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
Use of occupational therapy adjunctive treatments
Time Frame: Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12
At each occupational therapy visit, it will be recorded that they are either using or not using occupational therapy adjunctive treatments (ex: coban tape, ultrasound or electrical stimulation)
Post-operative weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Manitoba

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 28, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 28, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B2010:119

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Lacerations of the Hand

Clinical Trials on Stainless steel suture

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings