Botulinum Toxin Type A in Treatment of Cranial Allodynia in Patients With Headache

May 20, 2011 updated by: Federal University of Bahia

Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus 0,9% Saline in Treatment of Cranial Allodynia in Patients With Headache

The objective of this study is evaluated if the Botulinum Toxin Type A is superior to 0,9% saline in treatment of cranial Allodynia in patients with headache.

Hypothesis

H(0): Botulinum Toxin Type A is not superior to 0,9% saline in treatment of cranial Allodynia in patients with headache

H (1): Botulinum Toxin Type A is superior to 0,9% saline in treatment of cranial Allodynia in patients with headache

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

After adequation and approve from ethics committee on research involving human the selection of patients with tension headache or migraine according to The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd Edition (ICHD II) will start in the Headache Clinic of Alcides Carneiro Universitary Hospital. Those selected will be oriented regarding to the study steps and potential risks of the procedures. The patients will catalog the occurrence of headache and use of analgesics for 30 days through daily headache. At the end of this month patients will be evaluated by a physician experienced in the treatment of headache to define the occurrence of pain or allodynia of the scalp. Data gathered in this consultation will be recorded in standardized questionnaires for the study. The questionnaire is divided: Patient's identification, illustration of the pain area and allodynea points, pain intensity by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and finally medication use will be collected in the Headache Diary.

The people are randomized with block permutation, security of equal distribution in two groups (number previous determined). One group with 0,9% saline and the other Botulinum Toxin A.

Finishing the application by the Researcher (Who doesn't know the result of randomization and the infiltrated containing). The patients will be submit to three evaluations: the first, 30 days after infiltration, with a doctor who didn't participate of the anterior steps and will analyze the pain intensity by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), an episode of headache and use of painkiller trough Headache Diary. The Doctor will ask to the patient localize, if exist, the allodynia points. The others evolution visit will happen 60 and 90 days after application, with this same doctor using the same methods. Another professional, who doesn't know about the anterior steps of the study, will do the statics data analyze.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Paraíba
      • Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil, 58100000
        • Hospital Universitário Alcides Carneiro

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with tensional headache or migraine as The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd Edition - ICHD II
  • Patients from both sexes older than 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fill the diagnostics criteria for more than one type of primary headache as ICHD II
  • Another neurological disease or systemic illness that causes headache.
  • Condition that contraindicate the use of Study's Medication.
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Use of botulinum toxin within the last six months
  • Blood, liver, or kidney disorders and pregnant or lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Btx-A: Active Comparator
Botulinum Toxin group Will have the syringe with Botulinum toxin type A . During the study the patients will be following in the headache's clinic where the evaluator will graduate the pathologies' evolution.
Drug: Botulinum toxin type A
Botulinum Toxin group Will have the syringe with Botulinum toxin type A . During the study the patients will be following in the headache's clinic where the evaluator will graduate the pathologies' evolution.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo Comparator
0,9% saline group Will have the syringe with 0,9% saline. During the study the patients will be following in the headache's clinic where the evaluator will graduate the pathologies' evolution .
Drug: 0,9% saline
0,9% saline group Will have the syringe with 0,9% saline. During the study the patients will be following in the headache's clinic where the evaluator will graduate the pathologies' evolution .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the allodynea's improvement following these criteria
Time Frame: six months
Evaluate the allodynea's improvement following these criteria: Disappearing at least 50% infiltrated painful points.
six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the headache's improvement following these criteria:
Time Frame: six months
Headache's episodes reduction at least 50% in the last month or pain intensity reduction by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in at least three points or dose's painkiller reduction at least 50%.
six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Federal University of Bahia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 20, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 23, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 23, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 20, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LHUFBA001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings