Pharmacokinetics of Ch14.18 in Younger Patients With High-Risk Neuroblastoma

September 30, 2019 updated by: National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Pharmacokinetics of the Chimeric Anti-GD2 Antibody, ch14.18, in Children With High-Risk Neuroblastoma

This research trial is studying how Ch14.18 acts in the body of younger patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Studying samples of blood from patients with cancer receiving Ch14.18 may help doctors learn more about how this drug is used by the body to develop better ways to give the drug to potentially improve its effectiveness and lessen its side effects.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Describe the pharmacokinetics of ch14.18 (monoclonal antibody Ch14.18) in children with high-risk neuroblastoma.

II. Quantify the degree of inter-patient and intra-patient variability in the clearance of ch14.18, and correlate ch14.18 clearance with patient characteristics, the presence of human anti-chimeric antibody (HACA), tumor burden (assessed on scans), and plasma GD2 levels to identify sources of variability in the clearance.

III. Develop a pharmacokinetic model to describe the pharmacokinetic profile of ch14.18 and derive pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Correlate plasma concentrations of ch14.18 with the severity of neuropathic pain, which is being quantified using an observational pain scale, and the total dose of morphine administered to control pain.

II. Develop a limited sampling strategy that will accurately quantify the area under the curve (AUC) of ch14.18.

III. Simulate alternative dosing strategies with the pharmacokinetic model in order to reduce variability and simplify drug administration.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo blood sample collection at baseline and during and after course 1, 3, or 5 of treatment for pharmacokinetic analysis. Some patients undergo blood sample collection at baseline and during and after two treatment courses (1 and 3, 1 and 5, or 3 and 5).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with high-risk neuroblastoma enrolled on Children's Oncology Group (COG) ANBL0032 or ANBL0931

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of high-risk neuroblastoma
  • Enrolled on the COG protocol ANBL0032 or ANBL0931 and eligible to receive ch14.18 according to the criteria on these primary treatment protocols
  • Parental informed consent and verbal assent of the subject when appropriate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior testing demonstrating the presence of HACA
  • Anaphylactic reaction to ch14.18 on a prior treatment cycle

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Ancillary-Correlative (pharmacokinetics of ch14.18)
Patients undergo blood sample collection at baseline and during and after course 1, 3, or 5 of treatment for pharmacokinetic analysis. Some patients undergo blood sample collection at baseline and during and after two treatment courses (1 and 3, 1 and 5, or 3 and 5).
Other: Pharmacological Study
Correlative studies
Other: Cytology Specimen Collection Procedure
Correlative studies
Other Names:
  • Cytologic Sampling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PK parameters of monoclonal antibody ch14.18 in children with high?risk neuroblastoma during and after 4 daily 10?hour infusions
Time Frame: Before and after infusion on days 3-5; before, after, 4-6 hours after, and 12-14 hours after infusion on day 6; on the morning of days 10, 14, 17, and 24; and before infusion on day 31
PK parameters include the peak concentration, trough concentration, AUC, clearance, volume of distribution, half-life, and mean residence time. PK parameters will be derived from the plasma concentration-time data. A one-compartment model fit to the concentration-time data will estimated the volume of distribution and the first order elimination rate constant, which will in turn be used to calculate clearance, half-life, AUC0-infinity, AUC0-last, and the mean residence time. An error function and the dependency for each fitted parameter will be reported.
Before and after infusion on days 3-5; before, after, 4-6 hours after, and 12-14 hours after infusion on day 6; on the morning of days 10, 14, 17, and 24; and before infusion on day 31
Coefficient of variation of monoclonal antibody ch14.18 clearance
Time Frame: Up to 58 days
The coefficient of variation of Ch14.18 clearance is used to quantify the degree of inter-patient and intra-patient variability of monoclonal antibody ch14.18 pharmacokinetics. The relationship between patient characteristics, HACA, tumor burden, and plasma GD2 levels will be assessed graphically in an exploratory fashion with regression models.
Up to 58 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of neuropathic pain, quantified using an observational pain scale based on the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (FLACC) and the total dose of morphine delivered
Time Frame: Up to 58 days
The pain measures will be correlated with plasma concentrations of monoclonal antibody ch14.18 simulated using the PK model and the monoclonal antibody ch14.18 AUC0-96 hours. The overall drug exposure during the infusion will be correlated with the total morphine dose administered over the 4 days of treatment.
Up to 58 days
AUC of Ch14.18
Time Frame: Up to 58 days
A limited sampling strategy that will accurately quantify the AUC of monoclonal antibody ch14.18 will be developed.
Up to 58 days
Alternative dosing strategies
Time Frame: Up to 58 days
Alternative dosing strategies will be simulated with the pharmacokinetic model in order to reduce variability and simplify drug administration.
Up to 58 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Frank M Balis, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 26, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 16, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 17, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NCI-2011-02975 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • P30CA016520 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • CHP-1002
  • CDR0000701215
  • CHP1002 (Other Identifier: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia)
  • 9122 (Other Identifier: CTEP)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings