Mepilex Ag Versus Silver Sulfadiazine in Children and Adults With Burn Injuries.

November 10, 2017 updated by: Molnlycke Health Care AB

An Open, Randomized, Comparative, Multi-centre Investigation Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerance of Mepilex Ag Versus Silver Sulfadiazine in the Treatment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries.

The purpose is to compare time to healing using absorbent foam silver dressing (Mepilex Ag) compared to a silver sulfadiazine (SSD) 1% cream in the treatment of partial thickness burn injuries.284 in-patients in 8-12 centres in China will be evaluated. Treatment period will be up to 4 weeks with either Mepilex Ag or SSD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Subjects enrolled in this investigation were in-patients at eleven centers in China. To be included, subjects had to have deep partial-thickness burn injuries. The subjects were consecutively allocated to a subject code providing they fulfilled all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and had signed a written informed consent form. Two evaluators independent of each other made the judgment regarding depth of the burn before enrolling a subject. The subjects were randomized to either receive Mepilex Ag or SSD.

Treatment period were up to four weeks with either SSD or Mepilex Ag. Changes of the investigation products were performed according to a standardized schedule, unless the wound healed before.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
162

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Beijing Children's Hospital
      • Shanghai, China
        • Changhai Hoospital of Shanghai
    • Guangdong
      • Guangdong, Guangdong, China
        • The 1st People's Hospital of Foshan
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510220
        • Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital
    • Henan
      • Zhenzhou, Henan, China
        • The first People's Hospital of Zhengzhou
    • Jiangsu
      • Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
        • The 3rd People's Hospital of Wuxi
    • Shanxi
      • Taiyuan, Shanxi, China, 30009
        • Beijing Jishuitan Hospital
      • XiAn, Shanxi, China
        • Xijing Hospital
    • Yunnan
      • Kunming, Yunnan, China
        • The 2nd affiliated Hospital of KunMing Medical college

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 61 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a deep partial-thickness burn injury covering 2.5%-25% TBSA (3rd degree areas not to exceed 10% TBSA)
  • Burn of thermal origin
  • Both gender with an age ≥5 years and ≤65 years at ICF
  • Understood and signed informed consent
  • Subjects who are younger than the legal consenting age must have a legally authorized representative

One study burn should be chosen which fulfil the following criteria;

  1. isolated burn area (not head and/or face)
  2. 2nd degree deep partial
  3. area is from 1 to 10% BSA

All deep 2nd degree burn should be treated with the investigation product, Mepilex Ag/SSD (according to the randomization).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Burns "occurred" equal to or older than 36 hours
  • Burns of chemical and electrical origin
  • Clinically infected burn (as judged by the investigator)
  • Subjects with lung injury or subjects being on a ventilator
  • Treatment of the burn with an active agent before study entry. SSD is allowed up to 24 hours prior to randomization
  • Subjects with dermatologic skin disorders or necrotizing processes
  • Diagnosed underlying disease(s) (e.g. HIV/AIDS, cancer and severe anaemia) judged by the investigator to be a potential interference in the treatment
  • Subjects with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
  • Subjects treated with systemic glucocorticosteroids, except Subjects taking occasional doses or doses less than 10mg prednisolon (day or equivalent
  • Use of immunosuppressive agents, radiation or chemotherapy within the past 30 days
  • Known allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the components (SSD , Ag glycerin, monostearate, glycerol, cetearyl alcohol, leveling agent O, albolene, light liquid paraffin, ethylparaben/ silicone, polyurethane foam pad containing a silver compound, activated carbon)of the investigation products
  • Subjects with physical and/or mental conditions that are not expected to comply with the investigation
  • Participation in other clinical investigation(s) within 1 month prior to start of the investigation
  • Pregnancy (pregnancy test needed if they do not use contraceptive)
  • Previously randomized to this investigation (PUMA 418

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Mepilex Ag
Mepilex Ag consists of a Safetac(R) soft silicone wound contact layer, a grey absorbent polyurethane foam pad containing a silver compound, activated carbon, and a vapour permeable waterproof film.
Device: Mepilex Ag
Dressing
Other Names:
  • Absorbent foam silver dressing
Active Comparator: Silver Sulphadiazine Ag cream
SSD Ag cream is white cream, 1% SSD Ag, 40g/tube This cream is indicated for prevent and treat secondary wound infection of small area, mild burn/scald.
Drug: Silver Sulphadiazine Ag cream
A cream used on burnt areas.
Other Names:
  • SSD Ag cream, 1% SSD Ag, 40g/tube

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Healing
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Healing will be defined as number of days
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Burn Epithelised/Healed
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Healing will be defined as 95% or more epithelialisation
4 weeks
Number of Dressing Changes
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Number of dressing changes including first assembly
4 weeks
% of Study Burn Healed After One Week
Time Frame: 1 week
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Molnlycke Health Care AB

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Zia Zhaofan, Changahai Hospital of Shanghai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 21, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 21, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 22, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 10, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PUMA 418

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burn Injuries

Clinical Trials on Mepilex Ag

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings