Medial Forefoot Block for Analgesia After Foot Surgery
A Randomised, Blinded Comparison of a Nerve Stimulator Guided Ankle Block Compared to a Landmark Guided Ankle Block for Pain Relief After Forefoot Surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
East Yorkshire
-
Hull, East Yorkshire, United Kingdom, HU16 5JQ
- Castle Hill Hospital. Castle Road, Cottingham,
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fit adults requiring forefoot surgery with bone cutting
Exclusion Criteria:
- Morbid obesity (BMI > 40)
- Known contraindications to regional anaesthesia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Landmark guided ankle block
This group will receive a landmark guided ankle block.
|
25-30mls 0.5% levobupivacaine will be infiltrated to provide a landmark guided ankle block.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: This group will be given a PNS guided ankle block
Peripheral nerve stimulation will be used in this group to guide local anaesthetic infiltration.
The technique is termed medial forefoot block.
|
This group will have 25-30mls of 0.5% levobupivacaine infiltrated as directed by peripheral nerve stimulation.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of local anaesthetic block.
Time Frame: Over ninety minutes from the start of the study.
|
The number of patients in each study arm with altered sensation to cold and pin prick, together with no requirement for opiate analgesia, following surgery was recorded.
|
Over ninety minutes from the start of the study.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intravenous opiate usage following surgery
Time Frame: 24 hours following surgery
|
The usage of intravenous morphine, delivered by a ptient controlled analgesia system, in each group was recorded.
|
24 hours following surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andrew J Coe, MbChB FRCA, Hull and East Yorks NHS Trust
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 07/H1304/118
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.