Fourth Generation Percutaneous Transverse Osteotomies for Hallux Valgus

October 1, 2024 updated by: Thomas Lewis, Orthopaedic and Arthritis Specialist Centre

The goal of this observational study is to learn if percutaneous transverse osteotomies for hallux valgus deformity are safe and effective. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. What is the change in clinical patient reported outcome measures after minimally invasive bunion surgery
  2. What severity of bunion deformity can be corrected with minimally invasive surgery
  3. What factors may lead to recurrence of bunion deformity
  4. What is the rate of complications following bunion deformity surgery

Researchers will retrospectively review a research registry containing prospectively collected clinical and radiographic deformity data collected as part of routine care.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

483

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
        • Orthopaedic and Arthritis Specialist Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive patients presenting to a private surgeon in Sydney, Australia

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary diagnosis of hallux valgus that has failed conservative treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Degenerative changes of first MTPJ
  • Previous hallux valgus deformity correction surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Consecutive patients
Consecutive patients aged 16 years and over, who had exhausted conservative treatment and subsequently underwent primary correction of hallux valgus (of any deformity severity) were included. Patients who underwent additional forefoot procedures eg. hammer toe corrections, distal metaphyseal metatarsal osteotomy, were included. Patients who had previously had hallux valgus surgery, or first ray degenerative joint disease were excluded.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ)
Time Frame: Patients completed the MOXFQ at 6,12 and 24 months following surgery. Patients outside of these time points were asked to complete scores at their final follow up.

A validated patient reported outcome measure for assessment of function in hallux valgus.

The Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) consists of 3 domains (walking and standing, social interaction [based on the patient's self-consciousness regarding their feet/shoes as well as the overall impact on social, recreational, work, and other everyday activities], and pain), with the score in each domain ranging from 0 (best possible score) to 100 (worst possible score). An overall summary "index" score can also be calculated. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) has been shown to be 16, 12, and 24 for the walking and standing, pain, and social interaction domains, respectively.

Patients completed the MOXFQ at 6,12 and 24 months following surgery. Patients outside of these time points were asked to complete scores at their final follow up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complication Data
Time Frame: Clinical notes were reviewed at final follow up (minimum 12 months post surgery) following surgery to assess for any complications
Complication data were routinely prospective collected for all patients until discharge and categorised using a modified Clavien-Dindo complication classification.
Clinical notes were reviewed at final follow up (minimum 12 months post surgery) following surgery to assess for any complications
EuroQol 5D Health Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: Patients completed the EQ5D at 6,12 and 24 months following surgery. Patients outside of these time points were asked to complete scores at their final follow up(minimum 12 months following surgery).
A validated patient reported outcome measure for health related quality of life. The EQ-5D is a standardized patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) assessing health across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels of severity, from no problems to extreme problems. The scores are combined into a health profile and converted into a single index value reflecting overall health, where 1 represents perfect health, 0 represents death, and negative values indicate health states worse than death. The EQ-5D also includes a visual analog scale (VAS) for patients to rate their overall health.
Patients completed the EQ5D at 6,12 and 24 months following surgery. Patients outside of these time points were asked to complete scores at their final follow up(minimum 12 months following surgery).
Radiographic Deformity Correction
Time Frame: Specified timepoints during study (6weeks, 6months, final follow up (minimum 12 months following surgery)
The intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and hallux valgus angle (HVA) were measured according to the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society technique and categorised with regards to deformity severity. pre-operatively, six months following surgery and final follow up. Round sign and sesamoid coverage were classified according to Okuda et al. and Yildirim et al.
Specified timepoints during study (6weeks, 6months, final follow up (minimum 12 months following surgery)
Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS Pain)
Time Frame: Patients completed the VAS Pain at 6,12 and 24 months following surgery. Patients outside of these time points were asked to complete scores at their final follow up(minimum 12 months following surgery).
A validated outcome measure to assess pain. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain consists of a straight line with one end labeled no pain(0) and the other worst possible pain(100). Patients mark a point on the line that represents their pain level, and the distance from the no pain end to the mark is measured to quantify the pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity, with 0 being no pain and 100 being the worst imaginable pain.
Patients completed the VAS Pain at 6,12 and 24 months following surgery. Patients outside of these time points were asked to complete scores at their final follow up(minimum 12 months following surgery).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Lam, MBBS (Hons), FRACS,, Orthopaedic and Arthritis Specialist Centre, Chatswood, Sydney, Australia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Patient consent not discussed for sharing of IPD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Forefoot Surgery

Subscribe