Efficacy and Safety of TAK-385 in the Treatment of Endometriosis

February 24, 2014 updated by: Takeda

A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-385 10, 20, and 40 mg (p.o.) in the Treatment of Endometriosis

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of TAK-385, once daily (QD), for 12 weeks in women with endometriosis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This Phase II, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3 dose levels (10, 20, and 40 mg) of TAK-385 following oral administration for 12 weeks in women with endometriosis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
487

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
    • Aichi
      • Nagoya-shi, Aichi, Japan
    • Chiba
      • Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan
      • Funabashi-shi, Chiba, Japan
      • Ichihara-shi, Chiba, Japan
      • Yachiyo-shi, Chiba, Japan
    • Ehime
      • Nihama-shi, Ehime, Japan
    • Fukui
      • Fukui-shi, Fukui, Japan
    • Fukuoka
      • Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
      • Iizuka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
      • Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
      • Onga-gun, Fukuoka, Japan
      • Yanagawa-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
    • Fukushima
      • Koriyama-shi, Fukushima, Japan
    • Gifu
      • Takayama-shi, Gifu, Japan
    • Gunma
      • Takasaki-shi, Gunma, Japan
    • Hirosima
      • Hirosima-shi, Hirosima, Japan
    • Hokkaido
      • Ebetsu-shi, Hokkaido, Japan
      • Ishikari-shi, Hokkaido, Japan
      • Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, Japan
    • Hyogo
      • Amagasaki-shi, Hyogo, Japan
      • Kako-gun, Hyogo, Japan
      • Kawanishi-shi, Hyogo, Japan
      • Kobe-shi, Hyogo, Japan
    • Ishikawa
      • Kanazawa-shi, Ishikawa, Japan
    • Kagawa
      • Marugame-shi, Kagawa, Japan
    • Kagoshima
      • Kagoshima-shi, Kagoshima, Japan
    • Kanagawa
      • Hiratsuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
      • Kamakura-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
      • Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
      • Yamato-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
      • Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
    • Kochi
      • Nankoku-shi, Kochi, Japan
    • Kumamoto
      • Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto, Japan
    • Kyoto
      • Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan
    • Miyagi
      • Sendai-shi, Miyagi, Japan
    • Nagano
      • Matsumoto-shi, Nagano, Japan
      • Nagano-shi, Nagano, Japan
      • Suzaka-shi, Nagano, Japan
    • Nara
      • Nara-shi, Nara, Japan
    • Oita
      • Oita-shi, Oita, Japan
    • Okayama
      • Kurashiki-shi, Okayama, Japan
      • Okayama-shi, Okayama, Japan
    • Osaka
      • Hirakata-shi, Osaka, Japan
      • Ibaraki-shi, Osaka, Japan
      • Ikeda-shi, Osaka, Japan
      • Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan
      • Sakai-shi, Osaka, Japan
      • Suita-shi, Osaka, Japan
      • Tondabayashi-shi, Osaka, Japan
      • Toyonaka-shi, Osaka, Japan
    • Saitama
      • Iruma-shi, Saitama, Japan
    • Shiga
      • Kusatsu-shi, Shiga, Japan
    • Shizuoka
      • Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, Japan
      • Numazu-shi, Shizuoka, Japan
      • Yaizu-shi, Shizuoka, Japan
    • Tokushima
      • Komatsushima-shi, Tokushima, Japan
      • Naruto-shi, Tokushima, Japan
    • Tokyo
      • Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
      • Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan
      • Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
      • Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
      • Machida-shi, Tokyo, Japan
      • Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
      • Ohta-ku, Tokyo, Japan
      • Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
      • Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
      • Suginami-ku, Tokyo, Japan
    • Toyama
      • Toyama-shi, Toyama, Japan
    • Yamaguchi
      • Yamaguchi-shi, Yamaguchi, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Premenopausal women
  2. The participants must have dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain associated with endometriosis.
  3. The participant has experienced a regular menstrual cycle.

  4. The participant has been diagnosed with endometriosis by method a), b), or c).

    • Laparotomy
    • Laparoscopy
    • Chocolate cyst of the ovary confirmed by MRI

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants diagnosed with measurable uterine fibroids with the longest diameter of 3 cm or larger
  2. Participants with lower abdominal pain due to irritable bowel syndrome or severe interstitial cystitis
  3. Participants with a previous or current history of thyroid dysfunction
  4. Participants with current or previous history of pelvic inflammatory disease
  5. Participants with positive PAP smear test result conducted
  6. Participants with a history of panhysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy
  7. Participants judged by investigator to have marked abnormal uterine bleeding or anovulatory bleeding
  8. Participants with a previous or current history of a malignant tumor
  9. Participants who have been treated with any of the following drugs: anticoagulant drug, antiplatelet drug, tranexamic acid, selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), activated vitamin D, other vitamin D, calcitonin, ipriflavone, steroid hormone, vitamin K, teriparatide,or denosumab
  10. Participants who have been treated with any of the following drugs: oral contraceptive and sex hormone preparation, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue, dienogest, danazol, or aromatase inhibitor
  11. Participants who have been treated with bisphosphonate preparation
  12. Participants with a previous or current history of hypersensitivity or allergy to Leuplin, synthetic LH-RH, LH-RH derivatives, gelatin-containing formulations or food containing gelatin, or have a previous or current history of severe hypersensitivity or severe allergy to other drugs
  13. Participants with non-diagnosable abnormal genital bleeding
  14. Participants with a previous or current history of osteoporosis, bone mass loss, or other metabolic bone diseases
  15. Participants with clinically significant cardiovascular disease or uncontrollable hypertension
  16. Participants judged by investigator to be inappropriate to participate in this study based on the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) findings
  17. Participants with active liver disease or jaundice, or with alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), or total bilirubin > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) in the clinical laboratory tests

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebo
TAK-385 placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily and Leuprorelin acetate placebo injection, subcutaneously, once every 4 weeks for up to 12 weeks.
Experimental: TAK-385 10 mg QD
Drug: TAK-385
TAK-385 10 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and Leuprorelin acetate placebo injection, subcutaneously, once every 4 weeks for up to 12 weeks
Drug: TAK-385
TAK-385 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and Leuprorelin acetate placebo injection, subcutaneously, once every 4 weeks for up to 12 weeks
Drug: TAK-385
TAK-385 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and Leuprorelin acetate placebo injection, subcutaneously, once every 4 weeks for up to 12 weeks
Experimental: TAK-385 20 mg QD
Drug: TAK-385
TAK-385 10 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and Leuprorelin acetate placebo injection, subcutaneously, once every 4 weeks for up to 12 weeks
Drug: TAK-385
TAK-385 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and Leuprorelin acetate placebo injection, subcutaneously, once every 4 weeks for up to 12 weeks
Drug: TAK-385
TAK-385 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and Leuprorelin acetate placebo injection, subcutaneously, once every 4 weeks for up to 12 weeks
Experimental: TAK-385 40 mg QD
Drug: TAK-385
TAK-385 10 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and Leuprorelin acetate placebo injection, subcutaneously, once every 4 weeks for up to 12 weeks
Drug: TAK-385
TAK-385 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and Leuprorelin acetate placebo injection, subcutaneously, once every 4 weeks for up to 12 weeks
Drug: TAK-385
TAK-385 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and Leuprorelin acetate placebo injection, subcutaneously, once every 4 weeks for up to 12 weeks
Other: Leuplin
Drug: Leuprorelin acetate
TAK-385 placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily and Leuprorelin acetate injection, subcutaneously, once every 4 weeks for up to 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Leuplin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score for pelvic pain as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Week 12 (one menstrual cycle)
Pelvic pain will be assessed using the VAS as pain evaluation scale.
Week 12 (one menstrual cycle)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS Score for Pelvic Pain
Time Frame: Up to Week 12.
Pelvic pain will be assessed using the VAS as pain evaluation scale
Up to Week 12.
VAS Score for Dyspareunia
Time Frame: Up to Week 12.
Dyspareunia will be assessed using the VAS as pain evaluation scale
Up to Week 12.
Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Up to Week 12.
Measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Up to Week 12.
Treatment-emergent Adverse Events.
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from first dose of study drug through the last visit (Week 16)
Up to Week 16
Vital Signs
Time Frame: Up to Week 12.
Vital signs will include body temperature, sitting blood pressure and pulse (bpm).
Up to Week 12.
Body Weight
Time Frame: Up to Week 12.
Up to Week 12.
Electrocardiograms.
Time Frame: Up to Week 12.
Up to Week 12.
Number of Participants with Markedly Abnormal Standard Safety Laboratory Values
Time Frame: Up to Week 24
Up to Week 24
Serum NTx
Time Frame: Up to Week 12.
NTx is one of the biochemical bone metabolism markers
Up to Week 12.
Serum BAP
Time Frame: Up to Week 12.
BAP is one of the biochemical bone metabolism markers
Up to Week 12.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Takeda

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 31, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 21, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 24, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 25, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TAK-385/CCT-101
  • U1111-1123-6890 (Registry Identifier: WHO)
  • JapicCTI-111588 (Registry Identifier: JapicCTI)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometriosis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings