Biomarkers in Autosomal Dominant Cerebellar Ataxia (BIOSCA)

September 4, 2019 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Identification of Biomarkers in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Cerebellar Ataxia

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias (ADCA) are a group of neurodegenerative disorders that are clinically and genetically various. BIOSCA study aims to identify markers of the metabolism (energy production inside the cells) in the blood and the brain of ADCA 1,2,3 and 7 patients and control subjects, in the perspective of future therapeutic trials.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Rational. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias (ADCA) are a clinically heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders caused by unstable CAG repeat expansions encoding polyglutamine tracts. ADCA have a wide range of neurological symptoms including ataxia of gait, stance, and limbs, cerebellar dysarthria, oculomotor disturbances of cerebellar and supranuclear genesis, retinopathy, optic atrophy, spasticity, extra-pyramidal movement disorders, peripheral neuropathy, sphincter disturbances, cognitive impairment, and epilepsy. Corresponding to neuropathological findings in hereditary ataxia, there are three fundamental patterns of degeneration on MRI: spinal atrophy, olivopontocerebellar atrophy, and cortical cerebellar atrophy. We previously showed an hypercatabolism in premanifest and early stage Huntington's disease (HD), along with a systemic metabolic defect: progressive decrease of the plasmatic branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) - correlated with low serum IGF1 (insulin-like growth factor 1) - and muscle energy metabolism abnormalities measured by 31P-NMR spectroscopy. We also observed a weight loss in SCA1, 3 and mostly SCA7 patients. In addition, we underlined in a preliminary study a significant decrease of the BCAA in SCA1,2,3 and 7 patients, suggesting that an energy deficit would also be implied in SCA pathogenesis. Transcriptional interferences are likely a part of SCA physiopathology, as shown in the retinal cells of a SCA7 mouse model, or as we detected over the cerebellum growth of these mice. The hallmark of the gene expression studies in SCA1 and SCA7 mice points out the implication of IGF1 pathway and IGF1 receptor. As in HD, these transcriptional disorders might witness the metabolic defects above-mentioned.

Study objectives. The primary aim of the study is to provide metabolic and imaging biomarkers in SCA1,2,3 and 7 patients and controls in the perspective of future therapeutic trials.

The secondary aims are to determine (i) an systemic energy profile in SCA1,2,3 and 7 patients with the confirmation of an hypercatabolic status, (ii) a brain energy profile in SCA1,2,3 and 7 patients measured by in vivo 31P-NMR spectroscopy.

Study population. BIOSCA will recruit 120 participants in the Pitie Salpetriere University Hospital located in Paris, France. The target cohort will be 80 patients - divided into 4 groups of 20 participants of each mutation - and 40 controls.

Study design. All patients (SCA1,2,3,7) will be assessed at baseline (visit 1), 1 year (visit 2) and 2 years (visit 3). At visit 1 and 3, subjects will undergo clinical, MRI, a bone mineral density and a resting metabolic rate assessments, as well as donating fasted blood samples. Each visit will last approximately 6 hours. At visit 2, they will have only a clinical assessment along with a fasted blood sample. Control subjects will be seen only at visit 1 and 3 with the same assessments as the patients.

Study period. BIOSCA is a prospective study for which each participant is enrolled for 24 months. The study duration is 36 months. The start date is November 2011.

Funding. BIOSCA is funded by a national funding hospital program in clinical research (PHRC) from APHP institution.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 (SCA1) Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2) Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 (SCA3) Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 (SCA7)

Description

Inclusion criteria :

  • More than 18 years of age
  • Ability to tolerate MRI
  • Positive genetic test to SCA1, 2, 3 or 7
  • Coverage by social insurance
  • Written informed consent must be obtained from the subject

Exclusion criteria :

  • Less than 18 years of age
  • Concomitant significant neurological disorder
  • Unsuitability for MRI, e.g. claustrophobia, metal implants
  • History of significant head injury
  • Unability to receive an informed explanation about the protocol
  • Unability to complete the protocol
  • Non coverage by social insurance
  • No written informed consent obtained

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 1 (SCA1)
Other: metabolic and imaging biomarkers in SCA1,2,3 and 7 patients
MRI, a bone mineral density and a resting metabolic rate assessments, as well as donating fasted blood samples
Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 2 (SCA2)
Other: metabolic and imaging biomarkers in SCA1,2,3 and 7 patients
MRI, a bone mineral density and a resting metabolic rate assessments, as well as donating fasted blood samples
Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 3 (SCA3)
Other: metabolic and imaging biomarkers in SCA1,2,3 and 7 patients
MRI, a bone mineral density and a resting metabolic rate assessments, as well as donating fasted blood samples
Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 7 (SCA7)
Other: metabolic and imaging biomarkers in SCA1,2,3 and 7 patients
MRI, a bone mineral density and a resting metabolic rate assessments, as well as donating fasted blood samples

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
metabolic biomarkers of SCA
Time Frame: 12 months or 24 months
12 months or 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
imaging biomarkers of SCA
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alexandra DURR, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 9, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 9, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 11, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 4, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P100125

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1

Clinical Trials on metabolic and imaging biomarkers in SCA1,2,3 and 7 patients

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings