Switch to Tenofovir Versus Continue Lamivudine/Adefovir Treatment in Lamivudine-resistance Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

March 31, 2016 updated by: vghtpe user, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Randomized Trial of Switch to Tenofovir Versus Continue Lamivudine/Adefovir Treatment in Lamivudine-resistance Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Who Have Undergone Lamivudine/Adefovir Add-on Treatment

  1. Adefovir add-on therapy is superior to switching to adefovir monotherapy or entecavir 1mg monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine resistance (LAM-R)
  2. Long-term adefovir add-on therapy was effective for viral suppression. However, the economic burden for such dual antiviral therapy is heavy because of infinite treatment.
  3. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a potent antiviral agent. TDF demonstrated potent antiviral efficacy in a subset of lamivudine experienced HBeAg-positive patients. TDF is also superior to ADV in HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive treatment-naive patients.
  4. Theoretically, TDF can replace LAM/ADV when viral suppression has been achieved by LAM/ADV combination treatment in LAM-R CHB patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a partially double-stranded DNA virus. HBV infection can induce a spectrum of disease ranging from asymptomatic infection to severe chronic liver diseases, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Chronic HBV infection is also a major cause of HCC in Taiwan. Over 350 millions people worldwide are chronically infected with HBV. Lamivudine was the first marketing and is the first-line oral anti-viral agent for the therapy of chronic hepatitis B. Infinite nucleoside analogue therapy may be needed for long-term viral suppression especially in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. The initial randomized studies demonstrated the clinical benefit and safety of lamivudine in both hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and -negative chronic hepatitis B patients. But as high as 20% of the cases under 1-year lamivudine treatment developed genotypic resistance, which defined as the presence of YMDD mutation on the HBV polymerase region. Genotypic resistance is almost always associated with virological breakthrough and exacerbation of liver function. Long-term lamivudine therapy was reported increase HBeAg seroconversion and provided clinical improvement in ALT levels. However, in a four-year follow-up study, YMDD-variant HBV was detected in as high as 67% of patients under lamivudine treatment. Several clinical studies have proven that adefovir add-on therapy is superior to switching to adefovir monotherapy or entecavir 1mg monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine resistance (LAM-R). Currently, AASLD and EASL guidelines recommend adefovir add-on therapy as a standard treatment for LAM-R CHB patients. Long-term adefovir add-on therapy was effective for viral suppression (8). However, the economic burden for such dual antiviral therapy is heavy because of infinite treatment.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a potent antiviral agent. TDF and ETV are recommended oral first-line therapies for CHB. TDF demonstrated potent antiviral efficacy in a subset of lamivudine experienced HBeAg-positive patients. TDF is also superior to ADV in HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive treatment-naive patients. Theoretically, TDF can replace LAM/ADV when viral suppression has been achieved by LAM/ADV combination treatment in LAM-R CHB patients. This clinical trial is a proof of concept study to evaluate the efficacy of switching to TDF monotherapy in such patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
160

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
        • Recruiting
        • Taipei Veterans General Hospital-Division of Gastroenterology
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yi-Hsiang Huang
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HBsAg-positive for more than 6 months (HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative).
  • Age > 20 y/o.
  • Under lamivudine/adefovir treatment for more than 1 year due to previous lamivudine resistance (LAM-R), current HBV DNA is undetectable (< 20 IU/ml) during enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HCV, HIV, HDV coinfection.
  • Uncontrolled HCC, malignancy or decompensated liver cirrhosis (CTP score ≥ 7).
  • Uremia patients or Creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dl.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Lamivudine plus adefovir
Continue lamivudine/adefovir add on treatment (standard treatment)
Drug: Lamivudine plus adefovir
Lamivudine 100mg QD for 36 months (adjust dosage according to renal function) Adefovir 10mg QD for 36 months (adjust dosage according to renal function)
Other Names:
  • Hepsera
  • Zeffix
Experimental: Tenofovir
Switch from lamivudine/adefovir add on threatment to tenofovir monotherapy
Drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300mg QD for 36 months (adjust dosage according to renal function)
Other Names:
  • Viread

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of virological breakthrough (defined as HBV DNA > 100 IU/ml)
Time Frame: Sustained viral suppression after switching to TDF for 36 months
Sustained viral suppression after switching to TDF for 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
HBeAg seroconversion (for HBeAg-positive patients)
Time Frame: HBeAg seroconversion rate at 1, 2 and 3 years
HBeAg seroconversion rate at 1, 2 and 3 years
Incidence of HBsAg loss
Time Frame: Incidence of HBsAg loss at 1-, 2-, and 3 -years
Incidence of HBsAg loss at 1-, 2-, and 3 -years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
China Medical University Hospital
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
Chiayi Christian Hospital
Chi Mei Medical Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yi-Hsiang Huang, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 13, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 31, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IN-US-174-0194

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings