Inhaled Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) in Hereditary Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis (PAP) (FAMPAP)

August 28, 2023 updated by: Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of inhaled recombinant human GM-CSF in individuals with hereditary Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis (PAP) due to partial dysfunction of the GM-CSF receptor.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298-0646
        • Virginia Commonwealth University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of PAP caused by bi-allelic mutations in CSF2RA or CSF2RB associated with impaired GM-CSF-R-alpha or GM-CSF-R-beta function, respectively, resulting in reduced but non-zero GM-CSF signaling
  • Able and willing to give written informed consent / assent as necessary
  • Clinically stable

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of a disorder of surfactant production caused by bi-allelic mutations in ABCA3, SFTPB, or SFTPC
  • Confirmed diagnosis of autoimmune PAP caused by a high level of GM-CSF autoantibody
  • Confirmed diagnosis of secondary PAP caused by an underlying clinical disorder known to be associated with the development of PAP, e.g., inhalation of silica or titanium; myelodysplasia and others
  • Treatment with any investigational agent in the 3 months prior to enrollment
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to GM-CSF or other yeast-derived products
  • History of asthma or other reactive airways disease
  • Known active, viral, fungal, mycobacterial, or other infection
  • A serious medical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator or data and safety monitoring committee, would make the patient unsuitable for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Inhaled Leukine (rhGM-CSF)
Inhaled recombinant human GM-CSF in individuals with hereditary Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis (hPAP) due to partial dysfunction of the GM-CSF receptor
Drug: Leukine
Participants will receive inhaled rhGM-CSF (Sargramostim, Leukine) at the dose of 250 mcg one time per week for 12 weeks. Following an interim safety evaluation, participants may be entered into a second 12 week treatment period where participants will receive either 250 mcg or 500 mcg once weekly. At the end of any treatment period, participants will be followed for 12 additional weeks in the absence of inhaled rhGM-CSF to evaluate safety and efficacy.
Other Names:
  • GM-CSF [Leukine (Sargramostim)]

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Time (Minutes) to Discontinuation of Exercise During a Standardized Treadmill Exercise Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 7 months
A modified Bruce protocol stress test was used to evaluate improvement in blood oxygen saturation (SpO2). A pulse-oximeter was placed on the participant's finger with the participant at rest while sitting in a chair. Leads for the electrocardiograph were placed on the chest wall. The treadmill was started at 1.7 miles per hour (mph) and a grade of 0%. At three minute intervals, the speed increased as follows: 1.7 mph, 1.7 mph, 1.7 mph, 2.5 mph, 3.4 mph, 4.2 mph, 5.0 mph, 5.5 mph, 6.0 mph, 6.5 mph, 7.0 mph, and 7.5 mph. The participant stopped the test due to intolerable dyspnea or if the SpO2 fell below 88%.
Baseline, 7 months
Change in Minimum Pulse Oximetry During a Standardized Treadmill Exercise Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 7 months
A modified Bruce protocol stress test was used to evaluate improvement in blood oxygen saturation (SpO2). A pulse-oximeter was placed on the participant's finger with the participant at rest while sitting in a chair. Leads for the electrocardiograph were placed on the chest wall. The treadmill was started at 1.7 miles per hour (mph) and a grade of 0%. At three minute intervals, the speed increased as follows: 1.7 mph, 1.7 mph, 1.7 mph, 2.5 mph, 3.4 mph, 4.2 mph, 5.0 mph, 5.5 mph, 6.0 mph, 6.5 mph, 7.0 mph, and 7.5 mph. The participant stopped the test due to intolerable dyspnea or if the SpO2 fell below 88%.
Baseline, 7 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide
Time Frame: Baseline, 7 months
Routine full pulmonary function testing, including spirometry, lung volumes, and DLCO, were performed according to American Thoracic Society guidelines.
Baseline, 7 months
Change in Minimum Pulse Oximetry During a Standardized Exercise Protocol Oximetry
Time Frame: Baseline, 7 months
Standardized exercise pulse oximetry (SEPO) was used to measure SpO2 at the participant's home on a weekly basis between clinic visits. Briefly, a pulse-oximeter was placed on the finger with the participant at rest sitting in a chair. Three baseline (resting) readings were taken over a period of 1 minute to measure the SpO2 at rest. The participant then began stepping onto and off of the first step of a staircase in the home while holding onto the handrail for safety. Stepping was started by placing the bottom of one foot onto the stair followed by the other foot and then removal of one foot from the stair to the floor followed by the other foot. This procedure was repeated at a frequency of 1 cycle per second for a total of 5 minutes. The participant's parent assisted by noting the saturation data at 1-minute intervals during the test onto the weekly exercise form in the participant's Diary. The participant's saturation data continued to be recorded for 3 minutes after the test.
Baseline, 7 months
Change in Radiographic Evidence of PAP Lung Disease
Time Frame: Baseline, 7 months
High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans were performed using an interval technique, a 1 mm slice was obtained every 20 mm. The slice series were placed so that images were obtained from the pulmonary apices to the lung bases with one of the images located at the level of the carina. The CT parameters were performed at full inspiration and required a lower dose than usual clinical CT scans; 1 mm slices at 20 mm intervals,120 kVp, 60 mAs, rotation time 0.5 second. Images were reconstructed with lung and soft tissue reconstruction kernels (B35F and B60F). The primary analysis was performed using the B60F kernel. Images were read and reported according to Radiology Department protocol. The raw data was recorded on a DVD and sent to CCHMC for centralized reading and lung attenuation analysis.
Baseline, 7 months
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, 7 months
The PedsQL quality of life questionnaire is a modular approach to measure health-related quality of life in healthy children and those with acute and chronic health conditions. It is self-administered and completed in less than 5 minutes. It contains 23 items divided into 4 domains: physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and school functioning. To reverse score, transform the 0-4 scale items to 0-100 as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. Higher scores indicate a better Health-Related Quality of Life.To create the Psychosocial Health Summary Score, the mean is computed as the sum of the items over the number of items answered in the Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Scales. The Physical Health Summary Score is the same as the Physical Functioning Scale Score. To create the Total Scale Score, the mean is computed as the sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the Scales.
Baseline, 7 months
Change in Dyspnea Symptom Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 7 months
The dyspnea visual analogue scales were used by the patient to record the level of dyspnea by a single mark on a linear scale. The dyspnea scale ranged from 0 to 10, with short of breath all the time equal to 0 and never short of breath equal to 10. A higher score indicated a better dyspnea score.
Baseline, 7 months
Change in Serum Anti-GM-CSF Antibodies Levels
Time Frame: Baseline and monthly up to 7 months
Serum GM-CSF autoantibody was measured as follows: microtiter plates were incubated (4°C, overnight) with rhGM-CSF, washed in PBS and Tween-20, and incubated (room temperature (RT), 1 hour) with blocking solution. Serum samples were diluted with dilution buffer and aliquots of diluted serum or standard were pipetted into adjacent microtiter wells, incubated at RT for 40 minutes, and then washed with wash buffer. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody was diluted with dilution buffer and pipetted into each well. Plates were incubated (RT, 0.5 hour) and then washed with wash buffer. Substrate solution was added to each well, plates were incubated (RT, 15 min), and color development was stopped with sulfuric acid. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a Benchmark® ELISA plate reader.
Baseline and monthly up to 7 months
Change in Serum Biomarkers - GM-CSF
Time Frame: Baseline and monthly up to 7 months
Serum GM-CSF was measured via a commercial ELISA kit from R & D Systems.
Baseline and monthly up to 7 months
Change in Serum Biomarkers - Surfactant Protein D
Time Frame: Baseline and monthly up to 7 months
Surfactant protein D (SP-D) was measured via a commercial ELISA kit from Biovender.
Baseline and monthly up to 7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Virginia Commonwealth University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bruce Rubin, MD, FRCPC, Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Principal Investigator: Bruce Trapnell, MD, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 12, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 12, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2011-0959_CCHMC_IRB

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings