Evaluation of Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Treated With Linezolid or Vancomycin

June 9, 2014 updated by: Pfizer

Multicenter, Retrospective, Observational Study to Evaluate Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Patients With MRSA Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Treated With Linezolid Or Vancomycin

The objective of this study is to review the local management of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hospital-acquired pneumonia treated with vancomycin or linezolid with the goal to define if any difference exists among these antimicrobials in regard to clinical and economic outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Non-randomized, retrospective, observational study

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
188

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This non-interventional study will retrospectively evaluate patients with documented MRSA hospital-acquired including ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with linezolid or vancomycin with incorporation of 100 patients in the vancomycin arm and 100 patients in the linezolid arm.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients will be enrolled in the study if they fulfill the following three inclusion criteria:

  1. Protocol criteria for HAP/VAP: Criteria for making a correct diagnosis of HAP will be met if the patient develops a new or progressive pulmonary infiltrate associated with at least two of the following: new or increased respiratory symptomatology (cough, sputum or tracheal secretions, shortness of breath), fever or hypothermia, leukocytosis, left shift, or leukopenia, or deterioration of pulmonary function.
  2. Isolation of MRSA from a respiratory sample or blood culture within 48 hours of the diagnosis of HAP/VAP
  3. Treatment of MRSA HAP/VAP with either vancomycin or linezolid with incorporation of 100 patients in the vancomycin arm and 100 patients in the linezolid arm

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients not meeting enrollment criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Linezolid observational cohort
Drug: Linezolid
Patients with documented MRSA hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with linezolid according to routine medical care.
Other Names:
  • Zyvox
Vancomycin observational cohort
Drug: Vancomycin
Patients with documented MRSA hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with vancomycin according to routine medical care.
Other Names:
  • Vancocin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success
Time Frame: 14 days after diagnosis with VAP or hospital discharge, whichever occurred first
Clinical success was assessed as number of participants cured or improved. Cure = complete resolution of signs and symptoms of pneumonia; Improvement = partial resolution of signs and symptoms of pneumonia.
14 days after diagnosis with VAP or hospital discharge, whichever occurred first

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Microbiological Outcome
Time Frame: 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Microbiological outcome was defined as superinfections (infections diagnosed within 72 hours of the diagnosis of HAP and until day 28) and colonization (positive cultures with a multi-drug resistant organism).
28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Duration of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Duration of hospital stay was assessed as number of days from VAP diagnosis to discharge from the hospital.
Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay
Time Frame: Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Duration of ICU stay was assessed as number of days from VAP diagnosis to discharge from the ICU.
Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Duration of mechanical ventilation was assessed as number of days from VAP diagnosis to extubation or to discharge if not extubated.
Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Duration of Antimicrobial Treatment
Time Frame: Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Number of Antibiotic Free Days
Time Frame: Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Louisville
Summa Health System
Sparrow Health System
Jackson Health System
Henry Ford Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 21, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 21, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 23, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • A5951168

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings