Microcephaly Genetic Deficiency in Neural Progenitors (MICROFANC)

March 1, 2018 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Microcephaly Genetic Deficiency in Neural Progenitors: Genotyping, Phenotyping and Functional Neuro-anatomy and Neurobiology Comparative Primitive Microcephaly (MCPH) and the Fanconi Anemia (FA)

The purpose of this study is to:

I. Compare neuroradiological phenotype and cognitive functioning of MCPH patients caused by ASPM mutations already characterized and published (Passemard et al. 2009a) with other MCPH-related patients (patients with MCPH1, WDR62, CDK5RAP2, CEP 152, CENPJ, STIL, or PCNT mutations)

II. Describe the neuro-radiological and cognitive phenotype of microcephalic patients suffering from Fanconi anemia, and compared them to subjects with:

  • Fanconi anemia but normal OFC (head circumference)
  • MCPH patients
  • Healthy control subjects Our hypothesis is that mutations in genes responsible of microcephaly impact differentially cortical brain development and functioning

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Phenotyping study on 2 different cohorts of rare disease affected patients:

  • Group1: MCPH (including different MCPH subtypes)
  • Group2: Fanconi Anemia (with or without microcephaly)

Inclusion criteria:

Common to each group:

  • Age > 3 years
  • Access to french "Social Security"
  • No contraindication for MRI

Group1:

  • Primary microcephaly without gross malformation within or extra nervous central system
  • OFC < -2SD at birth and < -3 SD after age 6months
  • Mutation in one MCPH gene

Group2:

Proven Fanconi Anemia with:

  • Positive chromosome breakage blood test
  • One of the 3 following elements:

FANCD2 positive test Fibroblast sensitivity to mitomycin Mutation in one FANC gene

Control subjects:

  • No antecedent
  • Normal education

Aims:

  1. Description of neurological, neuropsychological and radiological phenotype for each group

  2. Phenotype comparison:

    • groups 1&2
    • group1 or 2 with control subjects
    • different MCPH subtypes within group1
    • with or without microcephaly within group2
  3. Epidemiological data on these rare diseases in our population

Protocol:

Patients from both groups and control subjects will be evaluated in CIC for 1 day ½. They will be examined by a child neurologist and a geneticist. All of them will have cranial MRI (1.5Tesla). Neuropsychological assessment will be performed (Wechsler scales) for patients and control subjects.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
98

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75019
        • Robert Debré Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Group1:

  • Primary microcephaly without gross malformation within or extra nervous central system
  • OFC < -2SD at birth and < -3 SD after age 6months
  • Mutation in one MCPH gene

Group2:

Proven Fanconi Anemia with:

  • Positive chromosome breakage blood test
  • One of the 3 following elements:

FANCD2 positive test Fibroblast sensitivity to mitomycine Mutation in one FANC gene

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients aged ≥ 3 years:

  • Microcephalic phenotype consistent with MCPH (recruitment already done as part of a network GIS-Rare Diseases Institute). MCPH patients have already been selected in the cohort "Robert Debré."
  • Holders of a Fanconi anemia characterized in terms of cytogenetics, enzyme and/or molecular (patients in the cohort "Saint Louis" followed by the KRC rare aplastic anemia)
  • Healthy controls aged ≥ 5 years siblings of patients with Fanconi Anemia

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with Fanconi anemia:

  • bone marrow < 3 years
  • Post-transplantation neurological complications
  • developmental, genetic or environmental additional pathology

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Microcephaly
Microcephaly Intellectual abilities Cranial MRI
FANCONI ANEMIA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare neuroradiological phenotype and cognitive functioning with other MCPH-related patients
Time Frame: 3 years

The purpose of this study is to:

Compare neuroradiological phenotype and cognitive functioning of MCPH patients caused by ASPM mutations already characterized and published (Passemard et al. 2009a) with other MCPH-related patients (patients with MCPH1, WDR62, CDK5RAP2, CEP 152, CENPJ, STIL, or PCNT mutations)
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Establish a clear organizational chart for the diagnosis of primary microcephaly
Time Frame: 3 years

I. Establish a clear organizational chart for the diagnosis of primary microcephaly from the detailed description of the patient's phenotype

II. Establish epidemiological data on the molecular genetic causes involved in human primary microcephaly
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alain VERLOES, PU-PH, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Parsi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 29, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 26, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 28, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 1, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P 100128

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Microcephaly

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings