Pexiganan Versus Placebo Control for the Treatment of Mild Infections of Diabetic Foot Ulcers (OneStep-2)

May 19, 2017 updated by: Dipexium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Superiority, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of Pexiganan Cream 0.8% Applied Twice Daily for 14 Days in the Treatment of Adults With Mild Infections of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

The purpose of this study is to establish the clinical superiority and the safety of topical pexiganan cream 0.8% plus standard local wound care as compared to placebo cream plus standard local wound care, in the treatment of mildly infected diabetic foot ulcers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States
    • Arkansas
      • Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
    • California
      • Castro Valley, California, United States
      • Davis, California, United States
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
      • Napa, California, United States
      • San Francisco, California, United States
      • Santa Rosa, California, United States
      • Sylmar, California, United States
      • Vacaville, California, United States
    • Connecticut
      • Norwalk, Connecticut, United States
    • Florida
      • Coral Gables, Florida, United States
      • Doral, Florida, United States
      • Hialeah, Florida, United States
      • Homestead, Florida, United States
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States
      • Largo, Florida, United States
      • Miami, Florida, United States
      • Miami Lakes, Florida, United States
      • Miami Shores, Florida, United States
      • Pinellas Park, Florida, United States
    • Georgia
      • Evans, Georgia, United States
    • Illinois
      • North Chicago, Illinois, United States
    • Kansas
      • Hutchinson, Kansas, United States
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
    • New York
      • Mineola, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
      • Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
      • York, Pennsylvania, United States
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States
    • Texas
      • El Paso, Texas, United States
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States
      • Lewisville, Texas, United States
    • Utah
      • Saint George, Utah, United States
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
    • Virginia
      • Roanoke, Virginia, United States
    • Washington
      • Richland, Washington, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diabetes mellitus.
  2. Male or female at least 18 years old.
  3. Subject must agree to adhere to all protocol procedures and return for all scheduled visits, and must be willing and able to provide written informed consent.
  4. Subject is to be treated on an outpatient basis.
  5. Full thickness ulcer or a partial thickness ulcer on the foot distal to the malleoli with a surface area ≥ 1 cm2 after the wound has undergone appropriate debridement.
  6. Localized mild infection of the ulcer.
  7. The diagnosis of mild infection must be confirmed immediately following debridement at Baseline.
  8. Subject must have plain radiographs taken within 2 days prior to entry showing no evidence of bony abnormalities consistent with osteomyelitis, or gas compatible with tissue crepitus, in the affected foot.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. IDSA-defined moderate infection, including cellulitis extending > 2 cm; lymphangitis; spread beneath the fascia; deep tissue abscess; gangrene; muscle, joint, or bone involvement.
  2. IDSA-defined severe infection, including systemic toxicity or metabolic instability.
  3. Infected diabetic foot ulcer that is associated with local wound complications such as prosthetic materials or protruding surgical hardware.
  4. > 1 infected foot ulcer.
  5. Subject is currently receiving topical antimicrobial treatment for a localized infection of the study ulcer and whose infection is improving in response to treatment.
  6. Subject has received a systemic antibiotic within 48 hours prior to Screening.
  7. Concurrent or expected to require systemic antimicrobials during the study period for any infection, including diabetic foot ulcer.
  8. Bone or joint involvement is suspected based on clinical examination or plain X-ray.
  9. Clinically significant peripheral arterial disease requiring vascular intervention.
  10. Subject is expected to be unable to care for the ulcer or return for all scheduled visits because of hospitalization, vacation, disability, etc. during the study period, or is unable to safely monitor the infection status at home.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Topical placebo control
Drug: Topical placebo cream
Drug: Topical placebo cream
14 days of treatment
Other: Standard wound care
14 days of treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Topical pexiganan cream 0.8%
Drug: Topical pexiganan cream 0.8%
Other: Standard wound care
14 days of treatment
Drug: Topical pexiganan cream 0.8%
14 days of treatment
Other Names:
  • MSI-78

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinical Response
Time Frame: 28 days
The numbers of participants with Clinical Response, defined as resolution of infection, are reported.
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response
Time Frame: 28 days
The numbers of participants with Microbiological Response, defined are eradication of all baseline pathogens, are reported.
28 days
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Time Frame: 28 days
The number of participants with TEAEs, including Serious TEAEs, are reported
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dipexium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Michael H. Silverman, MD, BioStrategics Consulting Ltd

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 7, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 9, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 19, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DPX-306

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings