Prospective Observational Study to Describe Characteristics and Management of Patients Treated With Denosumab (Prolia®) in Routine Clinical Practice

March 4, 2019 updated by: Amgen

Prospective Observational Study to Describe Characteristics and Management of Patients With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treated With Prolia® in Routine Clinical Practice

The objective of this prospective, observational study in Czech Republic and Slovakia is to describe per country the characteristics of women treated with denosumab in routine clinical practice and the clinical management of these patients during the first 2 years of treatment. In addition, the study aims to collect safety data in the real-life clinical practice settings on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious ADRs.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Czechia
      • Brno, Czechia, 602 00
        • Research Site
      • Brno, Czechia, 638 00
        • Research Site
      • Ceske Budejovice, Czechia, 370 01
        • Research Site
      • Havlickuv Brod, Czechia, 580 22
        • Research Site
      • Karlovy Vary, Czechia, 367 17
        • Research Site
      • Kutna Hora, Czechia, 284 01
        • Research Site
      • Ostrava, Czechia, 702 00
        • Research Site
      • Ostrava-Trebovice, Czechia, 722 00
        • Research Site
      • Plzen, Czechia, 323 00
        • Research Site
      • Praha 11, Czechia, 148 00
        • Research Site
      • Praha 2, Czechia, 128 50
        • Research Site
      • Praha 4 - Nusle, Czechia, 140 00
        • Research Site
      • Trutnov, Czechia, 541 21
        • Research Site
      • Vsetin, Czechia, 755 01
        • Research Site
      • Zlin, Czechia, 760 01
        • Research Site
      • Zlin, Czechia
        • Osteocentrum Zlin
  • Slovakia
      • Banska Bystrica, Slovakia, 974 01
        • Research Site
      • Bratislava, Slovakia, 826 06
        • Research Site
      • Bratislava, Slovakia, 833 05
        • Research Site
      • Humenne, Slovakia, 066 01
        • Research Site
      • Kosice, Slovakia, 040 01
        • Research Site
      • Kosice-Saca, Slovakia, 040 15
        • Research Site
      • Lubochna, Slovakia, 034 91
        • Research Site
      • Lucenec, Slovakia, 984 01
        • Research Site
      • Martin, Slovakia, 036 01
        • Research Site
      • Nitra, Slovakia, 949 01
        • Research Site
      • Presov, Slovakia, 080 01
        • Research Site
      • Trnava, Slovakia, 917 75
        • Research Site
      • Zilina, Slovakia, 010 01
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study was conducted at various study centers in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who receive an injection of denosumab and meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be eligible to participate in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Women with a clinical diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis
  • Decision has been made to treat with denosumab 60 mg once every 6 months
  • Have received their first injection of denosumab within 8 weeks prior to enrolling in this study.
  • Appropriate written informed consent has been obtained (as required per local country regulations)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Participating in ongoing or have participated in previous denosumab clinical trials
  • Participation in other clinical or device trials in the last 6 months
  • Contra-indicated for treatment with Prolia® according to the approved applicable local product label.
  • Subject has any kind of disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Denosumab
Patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Biological: Denosumab
This is an non-interventional study, therefore denosumab is administered as part of routine care and not for purposes of the study.
Other Names:
  • Prolia®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Receiving All Prescriptions and Injections of Denosumab From the Initial Prescribing Physician's Office
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of participants who received all injection(s), including baseline injection, from the initial prescribing site irrespective of total number of injections received on study.
24 months
Number of Participants Receiving an Individual Prescription and Injection of Denosumab From the Initial Prescribing Physician Office by Each Individual Injection
Time Frame: Baseline (day 1), and at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 (corresponding to the first, second, third and fourth post-baseline injections respectively)
Baseline (day 1), and at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 (corresponding to the first, second, third and fourth post-baseline injections respectively)
Number of Participants Receiving All Prescriptions and Injections of Denosumab
Time Frame: Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 (corresponding to the first, second, third and fourth post-baseline injections respectively)
Number of participants receiving all prescriptions and injections of denosumab whether or not the injections are given at the initial prescribing physician's office.
Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 (corresponding to the first, second, third and fourth post-baseline injections respectively)
Number of Participants With a Referral by the Prescribing Physician to Other Health Care Providers for Continuation or Follow-up of Care
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Types of Health Care Providers Administering an Individual Injection of Denosumab at the Baseline Injection
Time Frame: Baseline (day 1)
Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the baseline injection.
Baseline (day 1)
Types of Health Care Providers Administering Denosumab at the First Post-baseline Injection
Time Frame: Month 6
Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the first post-baseline injection.
Month 6
Types of Health Care Providers Administering Denosumab at the Second Post-baseline Injection
Time Frame: Month 12
Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the second post-baseline injection.
Month 12
Types of Health Care Providers Administering Denosumab at the Third Post-baseline Injection
Time Frame: Month 18
Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the third post-baseline injection.
Month 18
Types of Health Care Providers Administering Denosumab at the Fourth Post-baseline Injection
Time Frame: Month 24
Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the fourth post-baseline injection.
Month 24
Number of Denosumab Post-baseline Injections Received by Each Participant
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Number of Participants Having Radiologic Bone Assessments
Time Frame: Pre-baseline (before first denosumab injection) and during the study (post-baseline)
Number of participants having radiologic bone assessments pre-treatment with denosumab and during the study.
Pre-baseline (before first denosumab injection) and during the study (post-baseline)
Number of Participants Having Osteoporosis Related Laboratory Examinations
Time Frame: Pre-baseline (before first denosumab injection) and post-baseline
Number of participants having osteoporosis related laboratory examinations pre-treatment with denosumab and during the study. Participants may not have been given denosumab injection when they attended each visit.
Pre-baseline (before first denosumab injection) and post-baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) to Denosumab
Time Frame: 24 months
Adverse events (AEs) that were considered related to denosumab as evaluated by the investigator were classified as adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
24 months
Number of Participants With Serious ADRs to Denosumab
Time Frame: 24 months
Serious adverse events that were considered related to denosumab were classified as serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs). A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE that also: • is fatal • is life threatening (places the patient at immediate risk of death) • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • is an "other significant medical hazard" that does not meet any of the above criteria.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Amgen

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
One Amgen Center Drive
THOUSAND OAKS
CA
91320-1799
USA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 26, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 15, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 15, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 26, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 4, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20110132

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings