Live Versus Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Study in Hutterite Children

October 25, 2018 updated by: McMaster University

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Live Attenuated Vaccine Versus Trivalent Inactivated Vaccine in Hutterite Children

There is uncertainty about whether a live attenuated vaccine (LAIV) offers additional benefit over inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) in providing indirect benefit to those who are unvaccinated through herd immunity. The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine whether immunizing children in Hutterite colonies with LAIV can provide increased community-wide protection over TIV. Children aged 3 to 15 years in Hutterite colonies from Alberta and Saskatchewan will be randomized to one of two regimens: TIV or LAIV. The primary outcome of this study will be laboratory-confirmed influenza as detected by PCR in all participants (i.e vaccine recipients and nonrecipients). Secondary outcomes will include influenza-like illness, hospitalization, pneumonia, death, antibiotic use, absenteeism.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The goal of this study is to test whether immunizing children in Hutterite colonies with LAIV can significantly reduce laboratory-confirmed influenza in the entire community compared to TIV. We hypothesize that ≥70% uptake of LAIV compared to a similar uptake of TIV among healthy children and adolescents will reduce laboratory-confirmed influenza in LAIV colonies by 50% compared to TIV colonies. Other specific objectives are to determine if LAIV reduces influenza in the healthy children and adolescents immunized and if LAIV reduces the following relative to TIV in all participants: influenza-like illness, antimicrobial prescriptions, physician-diagnosed otitis media, school or work-related absenteeism, physician visits for respiratory illness, lower respiratory infection, pneumonia, hospitalizations, and death. We will assess reactogenicity in both study groups.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
4611

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1
        • McMaster University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Group A:

Inclusion criteria:

  • healthy children and adolescents aged 36 months to 15 years who will be immunized as part of the intervention.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. anaphylactic reaction to a previous dose of LAIV or TIV
  2. known IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to eggs manifested as hives, swelling of the mouth and throat, difficulty in breathing, hypotension, or shock
  3. history of asthma
  4. medically diagnosed or treated wheezing within 42 days before enrollment
  5. Guillain-Barré syndrome within eight weeks of a previous influenza vaccine
  6. anaphylactic reaction to gentamicin
  7. anaphylactic reaction to gelatin
  8. anaphylactic reaction to neomycin
  9. anaphylactic reaction to arginine
  10. pregnancy
  11. household contact who is severely immunocompromised being cared for in a protective environment (i.e hematopoietic stem cell transplant)
  12. use of aspirin or salicylate-containing products within 30 days before enrollment.

Group B:

Inclusion Criteria

  • other Hutterite community members that are not in Group A

Exclusion Criteria:

  • there are no exclusion criteria for this category of participants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Influenza vaccine LAIV
Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV).
Biological: Trivalent Inactivated Vaccine
Influenza vaccination, 0.5 ml dose administered intramuscularly. Previously unvaccinated children who are less than 9 years of age at the time of immunization will receive a second 0.5 ml dose four weeks later.
Other Names:
  • VAXIGRIP by Sanofi Pasteur
Active Comparator: Influenza vaccine TIV
Trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV).
Biological: Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine
Influenza vaccination, 0.2 ml dose administered intranasally. Previously unvaccinated children who are less than 9 years of age at the time of immunization will receive a second 0.2 ml dose of the vaccine four weeks later.
Other Names:
  • FLUMIST by Mediummune.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Laboratory-confirmed influenza infection.
Time Frame: up to 3 years
up to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Influenza like illness.
Time Frame: December to June each year for 3 years.
December to June each year for 3 years.
Physician diagnosed otitis media.
Time Frame: December to June each year for 3 years.
December to June each year for 3 years.
Antimicrobial prescriptions.
Time Frame: December to June each year for 3 years.
December to June each year for 3 years.
School or work related absenteeism.
Time Frame: December to June each year for 3 years.
December to June each year for 3 years.
Physician visits for respiratory illness.
Time Frame: December to June each year for 3 years.
December to June each year for 3 years.
Lower respiratory infection or pneumonia.
Time Frame: December to June each year for 3 years.
December to June each year for 3 years.
Hospitalization for lower respiratory infection or pneumonia.
Time Frame: December to June each year for 3 years.
December to June each year for 3 years.
All cause hospitalizations.
Time Frame: December to June each year for 3 years.
December to June each year for 3 years.
Deaths due to lower respiratory infections or pneumonia.
Time Frame: December to June each year for 3 years.
December to June each year for 3 years.
All cause deaths.
Time Frame: December to June each year for 3 years.
December to June each year for 3 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
McMaster University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mark B Loeb, MD, MSc, McMaster University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 26, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 27, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 25, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RC1-274129

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings