Fibrosis a New Pathological Actor in Adipose Tissue (fibrota)

November 10, 2020 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Adipose tissue (AT) has specific alterations in obesity in particular increased fibrosis amount compared to lean subjects. Fibrosis amount measured by immunohistochemistry on adipose biopsies appears to to predict weight loss response after a bariatric surgery. Non invasive tools to measure fibrosis needs to be validated. The investigators primary aim is to validate a new device able to measure adipose tissue stiffness.

Thus the investigators plan to compare the stiffness results obtained with the device to the quantification of fibrosis using immuno-chemistry in massively obese patient's candidates to a bariatric surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Adipose tissue (AT) has specific alterations in obesity that could link obesity to its comorbidities. In particular increased fibrosis abundance in AT has been observed in obese compared to lean subjects. The investigators previously observed that the amount of fibrosis in AT measured at baseline could predict surgery-induced weight loss. Patient with the higher amount of fibrosis at baseline were those who lost less fat mass one year after surgery.

To date fibrosis can only be measured using by immunohistochemistry after surgical biopsy. To that prospect, non invasive tools need to be validated, in particular device able to measure adipose tissue stiffness. The investigators hypothesis is that this new device is as powerful as IHC-quantified fibrosis to predict surgery induced weight loss.

To answer that question the investigators will evaluate adipose tissue stiffness with the device as well as quantify fibrosis using immuno-chemistry on AT biopsy in morbidly obese patients before and during the first year after a bariatric surgery.

The first objective is to validate the investigators new device by comparing both invasive fibrosis measurement on adipose tissue and non invasive stiffness measure The investigators second objective is to assess whether the investigators device can predict weight loss repose after bariatric surgery.

This project is based on a clinical protocol performed in massively obese subjects (BMI>40 kg/m² or BMI>35kg/m² with comorbidities). The investigators will recruit 250 obese patients addressed for bariatric surgery (bypass, sleeve or gastric banding). Clinical phenotype, biochemical analysis, body composition, systemic inflammation, adipose tissue biopsy (to evaluate inflammation and fibrosis) will be assessed at baseline and 3 and 12 months after surgery. Also at baseline surgical sub cutaneous and omental adipose tissue (to evaluate inflammation and fibrosis) as well as liver biopsy (to score non alcoholic hepatitis) will be analysed. 50 non obese patients will serve as controls. Adipose tissue stiffness measured with the device as well as fibrosis quantification on subcutaneous and omental adipose tissue will be assessed at baseline during programmed non inflammatory abdominal surgery Associations between all clinical and biological parameters will be assessed at the different point of the follow up.

More generally, this project might lead us to elucidate whether fibrosis in adipose tissue can predict surgery outcome in terms of weight loss and obesity related complications improvement. Also the investigators want to validate a new non invasive tool to measure adipose tissue fibrosis and check whether it can predict surgery outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
281

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Boulogne, France, 92100
        • Service de Chirurgie générale et digestive et d'oncologie du Pr Nordlinger -Ambroise Paré
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Service de nutrition du Pr Basdevant -Pitié salpêtrière/ Institut Cardiometabolism and nutrition

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria :

Obese population :

  • Obesity with BMI> 40 kg/m² or obesity with BMI >35 kg/m² with comorbidities (OSA, type 2 diabetes, hypertension etc…)
  • Age: 18-65
  • weight stable for three months preceding surgery
  • candidate to a sleeve or bypass or adjustable gastric banding

Controls:

  • BMI< 30 kg/m²
  • Age: 18-65
  • non inflammatory acute or chronic disease
  • candidate to a programmed non inflammatory abdominal surgery

Exclusion criteria :

  • Inflammatory disease
  • Pregnancy
  • cancer
  • Drugs (AINS)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: biopsy
Obesity with BMI> 40 kg/m² or obesity with BMI between >35 kg/m² with comorbidities (OSA, type 2 diabetes, hypertension etc…)
Procedure: biopsy
adipose tissue biopsy (to evaluate inflammation and fibrosis)
No Intervention: healthy volunteers
biopsy during a surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adipose tissue stiffness and fibrosis
Time Frame: baseline
In both massively obese patients and in a subgroup of lean and overweight control, adipose tissue stiffness will be assessed using the elastography non invasive device. Adipose tissue fibrosis will be evaluated using immuno-chemistry staining upon adipose tissue surgical biopsy and defined as the ratio of the surface stained with picrosirius and the surface of the biopsy. The investigators will then look for a strong statistical association between those two measures to validate our new device.
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
weight loss one year after surgery
Time Frame: 12 months
The investigators will separate our massively obese patients in tertiles upon weight loss importance one year after surgery and evaluate whether those who lose the most important amount of weight are those who had the less adipose tissue stiffness before the surgery
12 months
Severity of obesity related disease before surgery (in particular NASH acknowledged on liver histology)
Time Frame: baseline
The investigators will evaluate whether we find a significant correlation between the severity of obesity related disease and the adipose tissue stiffness at baseline.
baseline
Obesity related disease improvement one year after surgery.
Time Frame: 12 months
The investigators will check whether patients with the less important adipose tissue stiffness are those who improve the most their obesity related disease (separating our population in two those who improve and those who don't)
12 months
Adipose tissue fibrosis and weight loss response
Time Frame: 3 months
The investigators will quantify adipose tissue fibrosis using picrosirius staining on surgical adipose tissue and evaluate whether the amount of fibrosis at three months negatively correlates with weight loss.
3 months
Adipose tissue stiffness and weight loss response
Time Frame: 3 months
The investigators will quantify adipose stiffness using the non invasive device and evaluate whether the severity of adipose stiffness at three months negatively correlates with weight loss.
3 months
Adipose tissue fibrosis and weight loss response.
Time Frame: 12 months
The investigators will quantify adipose tissue fibrosis using picrosirius staining on surgical adipose tissue and evaluate whether the amount of fibrosis at 12 months negatively correlates with weight loss.
12 months
Adipose tissue stiffness and the severity of obesity related disease.
Time Frame: 3 months
evaluate whether the patients who improve the most their obesity related disease in the short term are those who decreases the most their adipose stiffness.
3 months
Adipose tissue stiffness and the severity of obesity related disease.
Time Frame: 12 months
evaluate whether the patients who improve the most their obesity related disease in the long term are those who decreases the most their adipose stiffness
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Judith Aron-wisnewsky, MD, APHP
  • Study Director: Karine Clement, MD, PhD, APHP

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 8, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 6, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 6, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 30, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 1, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 10, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P100503

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metabolic Diseases

Clinical Trials on biopsy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings