Comparative Diagnostic Yield of Endobronchial Cryo Biopsy Vs Forceps Biopsy in Patients with Suspected Sarcoidosis (CREBS)

February 28, 2025 updated by: Ajmal Khan, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences

Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Diagnostic Yield of Endobronchial Cryo Biopsy Vs Forceps Biopsy in Patients Undergoing Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Suspected Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multi-systemic granulomatous disease of unknown cause that is characterized by the formation of non-caseous epithelioid cell granulomas. Sarcoidosis involves the respiratory system in > 90% of cases, usually the hilar and mediastinal nodes, and, less frequently, the lung tissue. Airway involvement, as judged by clinical features, physiologic testing, imaging techniques, bronchoscopy, and airway mucosal biopsy, has been observed in nearly two-thirds of patients with sarcoidosis. Although sarcoidosis involving thoracic lymph nodes and pulmonary parenchyma is familiar to most clinicians, airway involvement is often overlooked. The frequency of airway involvement increases as the parenchymal disease progresses, and\airway involvement is associated with increased morbidity, respiratory symptoms, and mortality. The initial airway abnormality is the inflammation manifested by mucosal edema, erythema, and the formation of granulomas. As the airway disease progresses, the mucosa may demonstrate granularity, nodularity, cobble stoning, and friability. Sarcoid granulomas tend to develop along the bronchovascular bundle or in the vicinity of the airways. Overall quality of the endobronchial biopsy (EBB) will depend on the method by which it is obtained and cryo-EBB will most likely to provide better tissue for the diagnosis in comparison to forceps biopsy which has smaller sample as well as crush artifacts. Therefore, it is hypothesized that cryo-EBB will be better than forceps EBB and combined together it will increase the overall diagnostic yield of the sarcoidosis when combined with lymph node sampling by endobronchial ultrasound guided trans-bronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA).

  1. Primary objective: To compare the diagnostic yield of cryo-EBB with forceps biopsy in patients undergoing routine EBUS-TBNA for suspected sarcoidosis.
  2. Secondary Objective: To evaluate the overall diagnostic yield of combined endobronchial biopsy and EBUS-TBNA in patients undergoing routine EBUS-TBNA for suspected sarcoidosis.

The relevance and the expected outcome of the proposed study

  1. The study will provide insight to obtain an endobronchial biopsy either with cryo probe or forceps
  2. The study will also provide information regarding overall increase in diagnostic yield if any when the endobronchial biopsies are combined with EBUS-TBNA.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will consist of consecutive patients undergoing routine EBUS-TBNA for suspected sarcoidosis AND subsequently confirmed on clinical, radiology and non-caseating granuloma on histopathology. .

150 patients will be randomized into either cryo-EBB or forceps biopsy from a computer-generated randomized table. 75 patients will be included in each arm.

Determination of the sample size was based on the primary outcome of the proportion of diagnostic yield between two independent groups. Using the z test of proportion for two independent samples to detect a one-sided target difference between the groups of 15% with 85% power and a level of significance of 5%, each group required 69 participants. With an expected attrition rate of 8-10%, we capped the total number of participants in each arm of the study at 75.

Subsequent to EBUS-TBNA, video bronchoscopy will be performed to obtain the endobronchial biopsy by using either forceps or cryo-proble. Three endobronchial biopsies from primary carina and both left and right secondary carina will be taken in each patients irrespective of the endobronchial abnormality. Additional biopsies will be taken from any endobronchial abnormality detected during the examination.

The biopsy samples will be fixed in neutral 10% buffered formalin. In the pathology laboratory the sample will be embedded in paraffin followed by staining with hematoxylin and eosin or special stain according to the requirement to allow an exact classification. The samples will be analyzed and assessed by one pathologist according to common standards describing adequacy of the sample, crush artifacts, specific diagnosis. The pathologist will be blinded from the biopsy technique that has been used.

Diagnostic yield will be defined by the ability to make an adequate diagnosis on histopathological examination of the sampled tissue. Diagnostic yield will be calculated for each biopsy technique as the number of diagnostic procedures divided by number of non-diagnostic procedures plus the number of diagnostic procedures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Uttar Pradesh
      • Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India, 226014
        • Recruiting
        • Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Yash Jagdhari, MBBS, MD
        • Contact:
          • Mansi Gupta, MD, DM
        • Contact:
          • Sushila Jaiswal, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients of suspected pulmonary sarcoidosis scheduled for routine EBUS-TBNA

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient age less than 18 years
  2. Patients with co-morbid conditions like Diabetes mellitus, renal failure, chronic liver disease or any other chronic disease.
  3. Patients already on treatment with steroids or h/o steroids intake in last three months or on disease modifying and immunosuppressive drugs.
  4. Final Diagnosis other than sarcoidosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cryo-Endobronchial Biopsy
Endobronchial biopsy obtained using CRYO-Probe
Forceps vs Cryo Endobronchial Biopsy
Other Names:
  • Forceps biopsy
  • Cryo Biopsy
Active Comparator: Forceps Endobronchial Biopsy
Endobronchial Biopsy using Standard Bronchoscopic Biopsy Forceps
Comparision of forceps and cryo endobronchial biopsy
Other Names:
  • Cryo Biopsy
  • Forcpes Biopsy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Yield
Time Frame: Two week after the end of enrollment
To compare the diagnostic yield of cryo-endobronchial biopsy with forceps biopsy in patients undergoing routine EBUS-TBNA for suspected sarcoidosis.
Two week after the end of enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Over all diagnostic yield
Time Frame: Two week after the end of enrollment
Overall diagnostic yield - TBNA + Endobronchial Biopsy
Two week after the end of enrollment
Complications
Time Frame: From enrollment to Two week after the end of enrollment
Complications of endobronchial biopsy
From enrollment to Two week after the end of enrollment
Dignostic yield based on endobronchial abnormality
Time Frame: Two week after the end of enrollment
Diagnostic yield in normal vs abnormal endobronchial fingins
Two week after the end of enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ajmal Khan, MBBS, MD, DM, SGPGIMS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Available on request to principle investigator

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcoidosis Lung

Clinical Trials on Cryobiopsy with liquid nitrogen

Subscribe