Technical Accuracy and Userfriendliness of Two Point-of-care C Reactive Protein Devices in Comparison With Laboratory CRP Testing.
Study of Technical Accuracy and Userfriendliness of Two Point-of-care C Reactive Protein Devices
Study to test technical accuracy and userfriendliness of two Point-of-care C Reactive Protein devices (POC CRP devices) in comparison with laboratory CRP testing on children and adults.
Research questions:
- Are the POC CRP devices technically accurate? Do the measured values agree with CRP values measured at the clinical laboratory?
- Are the 2 POC CRP devices equivalent ? 2.1. Are the 2 POC CRP devices equally reliable? 2.1.1. Comparison of 2 measurements in the same patient on 1 device (inter-observer-variability) 2.1.2. Comparison of 2 measurements in the same patient on 2 identical devices (inter-device-variability) 2.2. Are the 2 Point-of-Care CRP devices equally userfriendly in a general practice surgery? (userfriendliness
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Vlaams-Brabant
-
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium, 3000
- UZ Leuven
-
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium, 3000
- Huisartspraktijken
-
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium, 3000
- Medisch Centrum voor Huisartsen
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- children: aged 1 month to 14 years
- adults: aged 18-65 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- children and adults not understanding Dutch language
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: point-of-care test for CRP
|
capillary blood fingerstick method to determine C Reactive Protein level in the blood
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
technical accuracy
Time Frame: 3 months
|
correlation obtained between the results from the Point-of-care C Reactive Protein devices and the results from the laboratory
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
User-friendliness
Time Frame: 3 months
|
evaluation of the userfriendliness by General Practitioners at 5 practices, on a five point Likert-scale scoring these criteria: device start-up, test duration, sample size, test characteristics, calibration, measuring range, handling of test tubes, filling of the capillary, placing the test cartridge, test recording and additional material usage.
The median results are compared between both devices qualitatively.
|
3 months
|
|
Inter-device variability
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The inter-device-variability (by 1 physician) was tested on 10 patients in one General Practice surgery each on two different Point-of-Care devices of the same brand.
|
3 months
|
|
Inter-observer variability
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The inter-observer variability (by two physicians) was tested on 10 patients in one GP surgery on two different Point-of-care devices of the same brand.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Van den Bruel A, Haj-Hassan T, Thompson M, Buntinx F, Mant D; European Research Network on Recognising Serious Infection investigators. Diagnostic value of clinical features at presentation to identify serious infection in children in developed countries: a systematic review. Lancet. 2010 Mar 6;375(9717):834-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62000-6. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
- Van den Bruel A, Thompson MJ, Haj-Hassan T, Stevens R, Moll H, Lakhanpaul M, Mant D. Diagnostic value of laboratory tests in identifying serious infections in febrile children: systematic review. BMJ. 2011 Jun 8;342:d3082. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3082.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- S54271
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.