A Study to Evaluate Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Treatment Experienced Adults

July 29, 2021 updated by: AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABT450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 (ABT-450/r/ABT-267) and ABT-333 Co-administered With Ribavirin (RBV) in Treatment-Experienced Adults With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection (SAPPHIRE-II)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ABT-450, ritonavir and ABT-267 (ABT-450/r/ABT-267; ABT-267 also known as ombitasvir) and ABT-333 (also known as dasabuvir) co-administered with ribavirin (RBV) in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infected treatment-experienced adults.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
395

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females must be post-menopausal for at least 2 years or surgically sterile or practicing specific forms of birth control.
  • Chronic hepatitis C, genotype 1 infection and HCV RNA level greater than 10,000 IU/mL at screening.
  • Previous treatment failure of peg-interferon and ribavirin (pegIFN and RBV).
  • No evidence of liver cirrhosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive screen for drugs or alcohol.
  • Significant sensitivity to any drug.
  • Use of contraindicated medications within 2 weeks of dosing.
  • Certain predefined abnormal laboratory tests.
  • Positive hepatitis B surface antigen or anti-human immunodeficiency virus antibody.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, plus RBV
Double-blind ABT-450/r/ABT-267 (150 mg/100 mg/25 mg once daily) and ABT-333 (250 mg twice daily), plus weight-based ribavirin (RBV; dosed 1,000 or 1,200 mg daily divided twice a day) for 12 weeks
Drug: ABT-450/r/ABT-267, ABT-333
Tablet; ABT-450 coformulated with ritonavir and ABT-267, ABT-333 tablet
Other Names:
  • ABT-267 also known as ombitasvir
  • ABT-450 also known as paritaprevir
  • ABT-333 also known as dasabuvir
  • Viekira PAK
Drug: Ribavirin
Capsule (double-blind treatment period), tablet (open-label treatment period)
EXPERIMENTAL: Placebo Followed by ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, plus RBV
Double-blind placebo for 12 weeks, followed by open-label ABT-450/r/ABT-267 (150 mg/100 mg/25 mg once daily) and ABT-333 (250 mg twice daily), plus weight-based RBV (RBV; dosed 1,000 or 1,200 mg daily divided twice a day) for 12 weeks
Drug: ABT-450/r/ABT-267, ABT-333
Tablet; ABT-450 coformulated with ritonavir and ABT-267, ABT-333 tablet
Other Names:
  • ABT-267 also known as ombitasvir
  • ABT-450 also known as paritaprevir
  • ABT-333 also known as dasabuvir
  • Viekira PAK
Drug: Ribavirin
Capsule (double-blind treatment period), tablet (open-label treatment period)
Drug: Placebo for ABT-450/r/ABT-267
Tablet
Drug: Placebo for ABT-333
Tablet
Drug: Placebo for ribavirin
Capsule

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After Treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Normalization of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Final Treatment Visit During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
Normalization is defined as alanine aminotransferase less than or equal to the upper limit of normal (ULN) at final treatment visit for participants with alanine aminotransferase greater than ULN at baseline.
At 12 weeks
Percentage of HCV Genotype 1a-infected Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After Treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Percentage of HCV Genotype 1b-infected Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After Treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Failure During the Double-blind Treatment Period: ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV Arm
Time Frame: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Virologic failure was defined as rebound (hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] ≥ lower limit of quantification [LLOQ] after HCV RNA < LLOQ or increase in HCV RNA of at least 1 log10 IU/mL) or failure to suppress (all on-treatment values of plasma HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ with at least 36 days of treatment) during treatment.
12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Relapse After Treatment: ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV Arm
Time Frame: Within 12 weeks post-treatment
Participants were considered to have virologic relapse after treatment if they had confirmed quantifiable plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) greater than or equal to the lower limit of quantification (≥ LLOQ) between the end of treatment and 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug among participants who completed treatment with HCV RNA < LLOQ at the end of treatment.
Within 12 weeks post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Jeff Enejosa, MD, AbbVie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 25, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 29, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 29, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • M13-098
  • 2012-002035-29 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings