Cellular Dynamics of Subcutaneous Fat Distribution in Obese Women (Apple/Pear)

April 29, 2021 updated by: Eric Ravussin, Pennington Biomedical Research Center
The body shape of obese women varies between having the majority of fat either above the waist ("apple" shape) or below the waist ("pear" shape). The study will investigate what restricts: apple"-shaped women from being "pear"-shaped at the cellular level. Since "pear" shaped women tend to have better health, this study will open the door to future research in regulating body shape and thus improving health.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Adipose tissue expandability and the distribution of stored fat in the body are stronger predictors of health risk. A better understanding of the factors that determine regional fat mass growth may lead to developing new strategies for prevention or treatment of metabolic complications of obesity. The objective of this proposal is to study the responsiveness of different fat depots to adipogenic stimulation in upper-body and lower-body obese women.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
63

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Louisiana
      • Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70808
        • Pennington Biomedical Research Center
      • Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70809
        • Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • You are a pre-menopausal woman between 18-40 years of age
  • Your Body Mass Index (BMI, weight-to-height2 ratio) is 27 - 38 kg/m2, inclusive
  • The ratio of your waist-to-hip circumferences is either >0.84 ("apple"-type body shape) or <0.77 ("pear"-type body shape)
  • You are willing to undergo a drug intervention for 16 weeks
  • You are willing to drink heavy water [similar to the ordinary water that is highly enriched in the naturally occurring stable (non-radioactive) form of hydrogen, deuterium; also called deuterium-labeled water] for 8 weeks before the beginning and during the second half of the drug intervention; you will need 24-hours access to a refrigerator for storage of the water.
  • You agree to use a double barrier method as a form of birth control to prevent pregnancy. Oral contraceptives (birth control pills) are not allowed in the study. Acceptable methods of birth control are condoms, spermicide, IUD (intrauterine device, must be hormone free - see list in clinic), diaphragm and abstinence. An example of a double barrier method would be condoms plus spermicide, etc.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • You have gained or lost more than 4.5 lb (2 kg) in the last 3 months
  • You have had significant changes in the diet or level of physical activity within the past month
  • You have a blood sugar of greater than 100 or a diagnosis of diabetes.
  • You have abnormal liver enzyme values from your blood work
  • You have a history of heart, kidney, lung, liver, and thyroid disease
  • You have an average blood pressure >140/90 at your screening visit
  • Have you had a positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B or hepatitis C?
  • You require chronic use of medications including diuretics, steroids, thyroid hormones, and adrenergic-stimulating agents (bronchodilators, nasal decongestants)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Administration of placebo to upper- and lower-body obese women
Drug: Placebo
Active Comparator: Drug
Administration of pioglitazone to upper- and lower-body obese women
Drug: Pioglitazone
30mg per day for four months
Other Names:
  • Actos

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In Vivo Adipose Cell Formation (Adipogenesis)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in adipogenesis at 16 weeks
Following the consumption of water labeled with the stable isotope deuterium (2H2O; heavy water), adipose tissue biopsies from the subcutaneous abdominal and femoral (thigh) depots will be collected. The 2H from the heavy water is enriched into the DNA of newly synthesized cells. Measures of DNA synthesis (obtained via gas chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis of 2H-enrichment) denote new adipose cell formation, or adipogenesis. The primary outcome is to assess the change (from baseline) in adipose cell formation rates (i.e. adipogenesis) in response to 16-weeks of pioglitazone versus the control group.
Change from baseline in adipogenesis at 16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visceral Adipose Tissue (Percentage of Total Abdominal Adipose Tissue)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in visceral fat at 16 weeks
The volume of fat tissue around the internal organs in the abdomen (visceral adipose tissue; VAT) and underneath the skin (subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue; scABD) will be determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the abdominal region. VAT:total abdominal AT (TAT) reflects the percentage of abdominal fat that is VAT and is calculated as VAT/(scABD AT + VAT).
Change from baseline in visceral fat at 16 weeks
Lipid Accretion in the Liver (Intra-hepatic Lipid; IHL)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in intra-hepato-cellular lipid at 16 weeks
Lipid accretion in the liver cells will be measured using 1H-MRS of the liver.
Change from Baseline in intra-hepato-cellular lipid at 16 weeks
Matsuda Index (Measure of Insulin Sensitivity)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in Matsuda Index at 16 weeks
Insulin sensitivity (glucose tolerance) will be assessed using an oral 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after an overnight fast. Blood samples will be collected at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after glucose administration to measure serum glucose and insulin. Insulin sensitivity was calculated using the Matsuda insulin sensitivity index [10,000/ √(glucose 0' x insulin 0') X (mean glucose OGTT x mean insulin OGTT)]. A higher value denotes increased insulin sensitivity.
Change from Baseline in Matsuda Index at 16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 13, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 29, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PBRC 10039
  • 5R01DK090607 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings