White Fish for Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome: the WISH-CARE Study

March 6, 2017 updated by: Jose I. Botella-Carretero, MD, PhD, MBA, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal

Estudio de intervención Nutricional Para la evaluación de Los Beneficios Sobre la Salud Derivados Del Consumo de Merluza en población Con Alto Riesgo Cardiovascular.

The investigators performed this study to evaluate the efficacy of regular ingestion of white fish to reduce cardiovascular risk factors in patients with the metabolic syndrome, compared to a diet with no fish or seafood at all.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study was designed as a randomized cross-over multicenter clinical trial with participating centers from the CIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), coordinated by the Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid. The investigators included adult patients with the metabolic syndrome as defined by the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III. All the subjects were Caucasian from European ancestry. Patients were randomized after the screening visit to one of two sequences: 1) Sequence 1 to receive fish consumption first and then no fish. The individuals randomized to this arm continued with their previous alimentary habits, avoiding any significant nutritional imbalance, and with an ingestion of 7 serves of hake (each serve consisted of 100g of frozen Namibia hake, Pescanova S.A., Pontevedra, Spain) per week for a period of 8 weeks. Afterwards they continued for another 8 weeks with the same diet except for the avoidance of fish and any other seafood; 2) Sequence 2 for which they started with their previous alimentary habits, avoiding any significant nutritional imbalance, as well as any fish or seafood for the first 8 weeks. Afterwards they were changed to the same diet but with 7 serves of hake per week.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
273

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Hospital Universitario Ramon Y Cajal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • We included adult patients with the metabolic syndrome as defined by the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fish allergy and positive antibodies to Anisakis spp.
  • Morbid obesity with BMI ≥40kg/m2.
  • Chronic renal failure.
  • Chronic psychopathy.
  • Neoplasia.
  • Refusal to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Fish - no fish
The individuals randomized to this arm continued with their previous alimentary habits, avoiding any significant nutritional imbalance, and with an ingestion of 7 serves of hake (each serve consisted of 100g of frozen Namibia hake, Pescanova S.A., Pontevedra, Spain) per week for a period of 8 weeks. Then switched to previous alimentary habits, avoiding any significant nutritional imbalance, as well as any fish or seafood.
Other: Dietary intervention with 7 servings oh white fish per week (each serve consisted of 100g of frozen Namibia hake, Pescanova S.A., Pontevedra, Spain)
Other: Previous alimentary habits, avoiding any significant nutritional imbalance, as well as any fish or seafood
Active Comparator: No fish - fish
Patients were on previous diet except for the avoidance of fish and any other seafood for 8 weeks. Afterwards they were changed to the same diet but with 7 serves of hake per week.
Other: Dietary intervention with 7 servings oh white fish per week (each serve consisted of 100g of frozen Namibia hake, Pescanova S.A., Pontevedra, Spain)
Other: Previous alimentary habits, avoiding any significant nutritional imbalance, as well as any fish or seafood

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum lipids
Time Frame: 8 WEEKS
The primary outcome was to study the effects of hake consumption on lipid profiles, particularly on serum triglycerides.
8 WEEKS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Other individual components of the metabolic syndrome, C-reactive protein, fatty acids, insulin-resistance.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The secondary outcomes were: the benefits on the other individual components of the metabolic syndrome, apart from lipids, as defined by the ATPIII (waist circumference, blood pressure levels, and glycemia); the effects on serum pro-inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, and also on insulin-resistance as calculated by the homeostasis model assessment; to identify specific biomarkers of white-fish consumption associated with the encountered benefits in patients with metabolic syndrome, specifically by measuring serum fatty acids.
8 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Omega-3 fatty acids in random subgroup.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
To identify specific biomarkers of white-fish consumption associated with the encountered benefits in patients with metabolic syndrome, specifically by measuring serum fatty acids.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
CIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn).
Pescanova S.A., Pontevedra, Spain.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 27, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 31, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 1, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WISH-CARE

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings