Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia Antibiotic Treatment Options (SABATO)

Early Oral Switch Therapy in Low-risk Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection

Increasing resistance to antibiotic agents has been recognized as a major health problem worldwide that will even aggravate due to the lack of new antimicrobial agents within the next decade [1]. This threat underscores the need to maximize clinical utility of existing antibiotics, through more rational prescription, e.g. optimizing duration of treatment.

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) is a common disease with about 200,000 cases occurring annually in Europe [2]. A course of at least 14 days of intravenous antimicrobials is considered standard therapy [3-5] in "uncomplicated" SAB. This relatively long course serves to prevent SAB-related complications (such as endocarditis and vertebral osteomyelitis) that may result from hematogenous dissemination to distant sites. However, there is insufficient evidence that a full course of intravenous antibiotic therapy is always required in patients with a low risk of SAB-related complications.

In a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial we aim to demonstrate that an early switch from intravenous to oral antimicrobial therapy is non-inferior to a conventional 14-days course of intravenous therapy regarding efficacy and safety. An early switch from intravenous to oral therapy would provide several benefits such as earlier discharge, fewer adverse reactions associated with intravenous therapy, increased quality of life, and cost savings.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

  1. WHO. WHO Global Strategy for Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance.: World Health Organization, 2001.
  2. Kern WV. Management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis: progresses and challenges. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2010;23(4):346-58.
  3. Gemmell CG, Edwards DI, Fraise AP, Gould FK, Ridgway GL, Warren RE. Guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the UK. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;57(4):589-608.
  4. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52(3):e18-55.
  5. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49(1):1-45.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

215

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Annecy, France, 74000
        • Annecy
      • Chambéry, France, 73000
        • Chambery
      • Grenoble, France, 38700
        • GRENOBLE
      • La Roche-sur-Yon, France, 85000
        • La Roche-sur-Yon
      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • Nantes
      • Orléans, France, 45100
        • ORLEANS
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Paris 5
      • Paris, France, 92100
        • Paris 1
      • Paris, France, 92110
        • Paris 3
      • Paris, France, 93000
        • Paris 2
      • Paris, France, 94010
        • Paris 4
      • Quimper, France, 29107
        • QUIMPER
      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • RENNES
      • Saint Etienne, France, 42800
        • St. Etienne
      • Tours, France, 37000
        • TOURS
      • Berlin, Germany, 12157
        • Berlin
      • Cologne, Germany, 50935
        • Uniklinik Köln
      • Dusseldorf, Germany, 40225
        • Düsseldorf
      • Frankfurt/Main, Germany, 60590
        • Frankfurt
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79106
        • Freiburg
      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
        • Hannover
      • Jena, Germany, 07743
        • Jena
      • Krefeld, Germany, 47805
        • Krefeld
      • Leverkusen, Germany, 51375
        • Leverkusen
      • Lübeck, Germany, 23562
        • Lübeck
      • Ulm, Germany, 89081
        • Ulm
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081
        • VUMC Amsterdam
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Amsterdam
      • Breda, Netherlands, 4814 CK Breda
        • Breda
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9700 RB
        • Groningen
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9700
        • UMC Groningen
      • Tilburg, Netherlands, 5022GC
        • Tilburg
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 CX
        • Utrecht
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 5022
        • Diakonessenhuis Utrecht
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Barcelona II
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Barcelona I
      • Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 07010
        • Palma
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41071
        • Sevilla II
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41071
        • Sevilla
      • Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG7 24 H
        • Nottingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age at least 18 years
  • Not legally incapacitated
  • Written informed consent from the trial subject has been obtained
  • Blood culture positive for S. aureus not considered to represent contamination
  • At least one negative follow-up blood culture obtained within 24-96 hours after the start of adequate antimicrobial therapy to rule out persistent bacteremia and Absence of a blood culture positive for S. aureus at the same time or thereafter.
  • Five to seven full days of appropriate i.v. antimicrobial therapy administered prior to randomization documented in the patient Chart. Appropriate therapy has all of the following characteristics:

    1. Antimicrobial therapy has to be initiated within 72h after the first positive blood culture was drawn.
    2. Provided in-vitro susceptibility and adequate dosing (as judged by the PI) preferred agents for pre-randomization antimicrobial therapy are flucloxacillin, cloxacillin, vancomycin and daptomycin. However, the following antimicrobials are allowed:

      • MSSR: penicillinase-resistant penicillins (e.g. flucloxacillin, cloxacillin), β-lactam plus β-lactamase-inhibitors (e.g. ampicillin+sulbactam, piperacillin+tazobactam), cephalosporins (except ceftazidime), carbapenems, clindamycin, fluoroquinolones, trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, tigecycline, vancomycin, teicoplanin, telavancin, linezolid, daptomycin, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, and macrolides.
      • MRSA: vancomycin, teicoplanin, telavancin, fluoroquinolones, clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, tigecycline, linezolid, daptomycin, macrolides, ceftaroline, and ceftobiprole.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Polymicrobial bloodstream infection, defined as isolation of pathogens other than S. aureus from a blood culture obtained in the time from two days prior to the first positive blood culture with S. aureus until randomization. Common skin contaminants (coagulase-negative staphylococci, diphtheroids, Bacillus spp., and Propionibacterium spp.) detected in one of several blood cultures will not be considered to represent polymicrobial infection
  • Recent history (within 3 months) of prior S. aureus bloodstream infection
  • In vitro resistance of S. aureus to all oral or all i.v. study drugs
  • Contraindications for all oral or all i.v. study drugs
  • Previously planned Treatment with active drug against S. aureus during Intervention Phase (e.g. cotrimoxazol prophylaxis)
  • Signs and symptoms of complicated SAB as judged by an ID physician. Complicated infection is defined as at least one of the following:

    • deep-seated focus: e.g. endocarditis, pneumonia, undrained abscess, empyema, and Osteomyelitis
    • septic shock, as defined by the AACP criteria (23), within 4 days before randomization
    • prolonged bacteremia: positive follow-up blood culture more than 72h after the start of adequate antimicrobial therapy
    • body temperature >38 °C on two separate days within 48h before randomization
  • Presence of the following non-removable foreign bodies (if not removed 2 days or more before randomization):

    • prosthetic heart valve
    • deep-seated vascular graft with foreign material (e.g. PTFE or dacron graft). Hemodialysis shunts are not considered deep-seated vascular grafts.
    • ventriculo-atrial shunt
  • Presence of a prosthetic joint (if not removed 2 days or more before randomization). This is not an exclusion criterion, if all of the following conditions are fulfilled:

    • prosthetic joint was implanted at least 6 months prior, and
    • catheter-related infection, skin and soft tissue infection, or surgical wound infection is present (as defined below), and
    • joint infection unlikely (no clinical or imaging signs)
  • Presence of a pacemaker or an automated implantable cardioverter Defibrillator (AICD) device (if not removed 2 days or more before randomization). This is not an exclusion criterion, if all of the following conditions are fulfilled:

    • pacemaker or AICD was implanted at least 6 months prior, and
    • catheter-related infection, skin and soft tissue infection, or surgical wound infection is present (as defined below), and
    • no clinical signs of infective endocarditis, and
    • infective endocarditis unlikely by echocardiography (preferably TEE), and
    • pocket infection unlikely (no clinical or imaging signs)
  • Failure to remove any intravascular catheter which was present when first positive blood culture was drawn within 4 days of the first positive blood culture
  • Severe liver disease. This is not an exclusion criterion, if the following condition is fulfilled:

    - catheter-related infection, skin and soft tissue infection, or surgical wound infection is present

  • End-stage renal disease. This is not an exclusion criterion, if all of the following conditions are fulfilled:

    • catheter-related infection, skin and soft tissue infection, or surgical wound infection is present (as defined below), and
    • no clinical signs of infective endocarditis, and
    • infective endocarditis unlikely by echocardiography (preferably TEE), and
    • in patients with a hemodialysis shunt with a non-removable foreign body (e.g. synthetic PTFE loop): no clinical signs of a shunt infection
  • Severe immunodeficiency

    • primary immunodeficiency disorders
    • neutropenia (<500 neutrophils/μl) at randomization or neutropenia expected during intervention phase due to immunosuppressive treatment
    • uncontrolled disease in HIV-positive patients
    • high-dose steroid therapy (>1 mg/kg prednisone or equivalent doses given for >4 weeks or planned during intervention)
    • immunosuppressive combination therapy with two or more drugs with different mode of action
    • hematopoietic stem cell transplantation within the past 6 months or planned during treatment period
    • solid organ transplant
    • treatment with biologicals within the previous year
  • Life expectancy < 3 months
  • Inability to take oral drugs
  • Injection drug user
  • Expected low compliance with drug regimen
  • Participation in other interventional trials within the previous three months or ongoing
  • Pregnant women and nursing mothers
  • For premenopausal women: Failure to use highly-effective contraceptive methods for 1 month after receiving study drug. The following contraceptive methods with a Pearl Index lower than 1% are regarded as highly-effective:

    • oral hormonal contraception ('pill')
    • dermal hormonal contraception
    • vaginal hormonal contraception (NuvaRing®)
    • contraceptive plaster
    • long-acting injectable contraceptives
    • implants that release progesterone (Implanon®)
    • tubal ligation (female sterilisation)
    • intrauterine devices that release hormones (hormone spiral)
    • double barrier methods
  • Persons with any kind of dependency on the investigator or employed by the sponsor or investigator
  • Persons held in an institution by legal or official order

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Orally administered antibiotic
First choice (MRSA and MSSA): trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or Second choice (MSSA): clindamycin, or Second choice (MRSA): linezolid administered for 7-9 days
study drug 1
study drug 2
study drug 3
Experimental: Intravenously administered antibiotic
First choice (MSSA): flucloxacillin [Spain: cloxacillin], or cefazolin or Second choice (MSSA): vancomycin, or First choice (MRSA): vancomycin, or Second choice (MRSA): daptomycin administered for 7-9 days
study drug 4
study drug 5
study drug 6
study drug 7
study drug 8

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SAB-related complications
Time Frame: 90 days
S. aureus bloodstream infection-related complications (relapsing SAB, deep-seated infection with S. aureus, or attributable mortality) within 90 days
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 90 days
Length of hospital stay
90 days
Survival
Time Frame: 14, 30, and 90 days
Survival at 14, 30, and 90 days
14, 30, and 90 days
Complications of intravenous therapy
Time Frame: 90 days
Complications of intravenous therapy, such as thrombophlebitis.
90 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD)
Time Frame: 90 days
Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD)
90 days
AEs and SAEs
Time Frame: 90 days
Adverse events
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Achim J Kaasch, MD, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 15, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Staphylococcus Aureus Infection

Clinical Trials on Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole

Search Similar Trials