Analgesic Effect of Non Invasive Stimulation : Comparison of rTMS and tDCS Efficacy (NI-MCS)

August 30, 2019 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Non-invasive Cortical Stimulation for Pharmacoresistant Neuropathic Pain: rTMS Versus tDCS

The aim of this study is to compare analgesic efficacy of two non invasive techniques based on motor cortex stimulation in neuropathic pain patients. High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) of primary motor cortex has been demonstrated to induce an analgesic effect significantly different from placebo; this effect is clinically useful if rTMS sessions are applied daily during five consecutive days. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a new approach of non invasive cortical stimulation but its efficacy in neuropathic pain has been not yet established. The investigators propose to compare the analgesic effect of 5 tDCS sessions applied daily to a similar protocol using HF-rTMS. In parallel to the clinical therapeutic evaluation, functional-MRI will be performed before and after the five sessions of rTMS and tDCS, in order to reveal the potential plasticity induced within motor somatotopic map of the primary motor cortex.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Lyon, France, 69000
        • Service de Neurologie Fonctionnelle et Epileptologie, Hôpital Neurologique de Lyon et Unité " Intégration Centrale de la Douleur ", 1028 Inserm - UCBL

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients aged from 18 to 80 years, male or female, fully informed and having given their written consent
  • pharmacoresistant neuropathic pain during at least one year, without any change of the pharmacological treatment since at least one month

Exclusion Criteria:

  • drug addiction, headache, epilepsy history
  • ferromagnetic intracranial device
  • implanted stimulator
  • absence of contraceptive method for women of childbearing age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: rTMS; tDCS
Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Five sessions of HF-rTMS or tDCS applied daily during 5 consecutive days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Pain at the end of the stimulation week Change from Baseline in Pain at the end of the first post-stimulation week Change from Baseline in Pain at the end of the second post-stimulation week
Time Frame: Here the Time Frames : Baseline; 1 week; 2 week; 3 week
Here the Time Frames : Baseline; 1 week; 2 week; 3 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
objective evaluation of sleep quality
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in percentage of sleep time at the end of the stimulation week; at the end of the first post-stimulation week; and at the end of the of the second post-stimulation week
actimetry measures
Change from Baseline in percentage of sleep time at the end of the stimulation week; at the end of the first post-stimulation week; and at the end of the of the second post-stimulation week
subjective evaluation of sleep quality using a numerical auto-evaluation scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in level of tiredness at the end of the stimulation week;at the end of the first post-stimulation week; and at the end of the second post-stimulation week
the patient is asked to evaluate each day the quality of his sleep using a numerical scale from 0 to 10.
Change from Baseline in level of tiredness at the end of the stimulation week;at the end of the first post-stimulation week; and at the end of the second post-stimulation week
nociceptive and non-nociceptive thresholds
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in nociceptive threshold after the first day of stimulation;after the fifth day of stimulation;Change from Baseline in non-nociceptive threshold after the first day of stimulation;and after the fifth day of stimulation
Electrical stimulation of variable intensities applied on the hand
Change from Baseline in nociceptive threshold after the first day of stimulation;after the fifth day of stimulation;Change from Baseline in non-nociceptive threshold after the first day of stimulation;and after the fifth day of stimulation
evaluation of motor cortex plasticity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in three-dimensional location of the activation peaks at the end of the stimulation week
displacement of activation locus found after voluntary movements; comparison of the plastic and analgesic effects of rTMS or tDCS
Change from Baseline in three-dimensional location of the activation peaks at the end of the stimulation week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospices Civils de Lyon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 13, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 17, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 17, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 30, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2011.662
  • 2008-A01379-32 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pharmacoresistant Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings