DCE-MRI Using Dotarem® in Evaluation of Therapeutic Response to Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Stage HCC (DCE-MRI)

June 24, 2019 updated by: Guerbet

Phase IV Study of DCE-MRI Using Dotarem® in Evaluation of Therapeutic Response to Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Stage HCC

The main objective is to evaluate the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) in prediction of response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to treatment with Sorafenib assessed by mRECIST.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

One of the secondary objectives was to evaluate the correlation between DCE-MRI perfusion parameters at baseline and:

  • Overall Survival (OS)
  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
  • Time to Progression (TTP)

Three DCE-MRI examinations were done during the study:

  • at the enrolment and initiation of the sorafenib treatment
  • one week after initiation of the sorafenib treatment
  • two weeks after initiation of the sorafenib treatment

DCE-MRI perfusion parameters were assessed by a centralized radiologist at baseline (corresponding to the day of enrolment and initiation of Sorafenib treatment), week 1 and week 2.

According to mRECIST criteria, HCC lesions were evaluated on computed tomography images by two on-site radiologists at the time of enrolment and 8 weeks later (2 months). OS, PFS and TTP were calculated from survival and tumor progression data recorded one year after initiation of the sorafenib treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
37

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
    • Gangnam Gu
      • Seoul, Gangnam Gu, Korea, Republic of, 135-920
        • Guerbet Korea

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  1. Male and female adult patients (age ≥ 20 years old)
  2. Patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC [Child Pugh class A and major vascular invasion, extrahapatic metastasis, or progression after transarterial chemoembolization more than 2 times]
  3. Presence of mRECIST target lesion within liver [lesion which can be classified as a RECIST measurable lesion (can be measured ≥ 1 cm in at least one dimension), lesion suitable for repeated measure, lesion showing intraluminal arterial enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI]
  4. Patients planned to be treated with sorafenib
  5. Patient with liver CT performed or planned to be performed within 4 weeks before initiation of sorafenib treatment
  6. Patient with a life expectancy of 12 weeks or more
  7. No previous treatment with sorafenib
  8. Female patients who are surgically sterilized, or post-menopausal (minimum 12 months of amenorrhea) or who have a documented negative urine hCG test at screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Gadoterate meglumine
there is one single arm of patients (no comparative arm)
Drug: Gadoterate meglumine
Gadoterate meglumine was administered at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg (0.2 mL/kg) using a power injector, in an intravenous bolus at a rate of 3 mL/sec.
Other Names:
  • Dotarem
  • gadoteric acid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation Coefficient Between DCE-MRI Perfusion Parameters and the Response of Target Lesions to Sorafenib
Time Frame: 3 months

To evaluate the correlation between DCE-MRI perfusion parameters (Ktrans, AUC, ve, kep, T1, Wash-in, Washout) at baseline, week 1 and week 2, and the response of target lesions to sorafenib.

  • Ktrans: volume transfer constant between blood plasma and extravascular extracellular space
  • AUC : area under the curve of tissue gadolinium concentration-time
  • ve: fractional volume of extravascular extracellular space
  • kep: rate constant between extravascular extracellular space and blood plasma (=Ktrans/ve)
  • T1: longitudinal relaxation time
  • Wash-in: slope of the early enhancement curve
  • Washout: slope of the late enhancement curve

The response of target lesions was assessed by mRECIST at 2 months after initiation of treatment (sorafenib).

The correlation analyses were done using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation Coefficient Between DCE-MRI Perfusion Parameters at Baseline and Overall Survival
Time Frame: 1 year

To evaluate the correlation between DCE-MRI perfusion parameters (Ktrans, AUC, ve, kep, T1, wash-in, washout) at baseline and overall survival.

The overall survival was calculated from the patient's survival status recorded one year after initiation of the sorafenib treatment.

The correlation analyses were done using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient.
1 year
Correlation Coefficient Between DCE-MRI Perfusion Parameters at Baseline and Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: 1 year

To evaluate the correlation between DCE-MRI perfusion parameters (Ktrans, AUC, ve, kep, T1, wash-in, washout) at baseline and progression free survival.

The progression free survival was calculated from the patient's survival status and tumor progression status recorded one year after initiation of the sorafenib treatment.

The correlation analyses were done using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient.
1 year
Correlation Coefficient Between DCE-MRI Perfusion Parameters at Baseline and Time to Progression
Time Frame: 1 year

To evaluate the correlation between DCE-MRI perfusion parameters (Ktrans, AUC, ve, kep, T1, wash-in, washout) at baseline and time to progression.

The time to progression was calculated from the patient's survival status and tumor progression status recorded one year after initiation of the sorafenib treatment.

The correlation analyses were done using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Guerbet

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jeong Min Lee, Ph.D, Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 9, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 12, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 12, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DGD-44-057

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

It will be decided after study completion.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings