Agomelatine Treatment of Depression in Schizophrenia (AGOPSYCH) (AGOPSYCH)

March 7, 2018 updated by: Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim

Agomelatine Treatment of Major Depressive Episodes in the Course of Schizophrenic Psychoses (AGOPSYCH)

Major depressive episodes (MDEs) occur frequently during the course of psychotic disorders, and several antidepressive agents have been successfully applied. The new melatonergic antidepressant agomelatine (AGO) appears promising for the treatment of MDEs in schizophrenia for several reasons. The investigators plan to test the efficacy and tolerability of AGO for antidepressive treatment in schizophrenia. For this task, the investigators plan to enrol 27 schizophrenic patients into an open, single-armed, prospective clinical trial with agomelatine.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Major depressive episodes (MDEs) occur frequently during the course of psychotic disorders, and several antidepressive agents have been successfully applied. The new melatonergic antidepressant agomelatine (AGO) appears promising for the treatment of MDEs in schizophrenia for several reasons: 1. AGO provides a unique pharmacological profile by combining antidepressive potency, sleep regulation and enhancement of frontocortical dopaminergic activity by 5-HT-2C-blockade. 2. AGO might exert favourable effects on cognition. 3. While pharmacokinetic interactions are generally possible, major influences on antipsychotic substances are unlikely due to metabolism by cytochrome isoenzymes CYP1A2 and CYP2C9/19. 4. AGO is characterized by a favourable range of adverse events (AE) which do not overlap with typical antipsychotic AEs such as weight gain and sexual dysfunction. Thus, the risk of additive effects seems to be small. The investigators plan to enroll 27 schizophrenic patients into an open, single-armed, prospective clinical trial with agomelatine. As predefined primary and secondary endpoints, we are going to investigate whether AGO is able to improve MDE severity, sleep quality, general and psychosocial functioning as well as cognitive function in schizophrenia without detrimental effects on the psychotic syndrome. Moreover, we intend to monitor for pharmacokinetic interactions. The results obtained will allow designing future randomized and controlled clinical trials in order to improve the range of therapeutic options for affective and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
27

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 68159
        • Central Institute of Mental Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18 and 60 years.
  2. Presence of an MDE according to ICD-10 criteria (HAMD17 ≥ 18 or CDSS-Score ≥ 8 points).
  3. Lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum disorder according to ICD-10 (F 20, F22, F23, F25).
  4. Partial remission of psychotic positive symptoms (PANSS positive subscore ≤ 15 points).
  5. Stable antipsychotic medication for at least 2 weeks (tolerable quantitative changes of daily dosage ≤ 25%).
  6. The patient is able to give an informed consent. In case of legal guardianship, the custodian will have to agree to the patient's participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications against AGO treatment
  2. Insufficient contraception in women of childbearing potential when sexually active.
  3. Gravidity or breastfeeding.
  4. Addiction to alcohol
  5. Current abuse of THC and other illegal substances according to ICD-10
  6. Dementia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Treatment
Open-label treatment with agomelatine 25 mg/day (or 50 mg/day after week 3).
Drug: agomelatine
Augmentation of antipsychotic therapy with 25 to 50 mg agomelatine as a single oral dosage per day
Other Names:
  • Valdoxan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antidepressive efficacy
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Comparison of MDE severity before and after six weeks of treatment with AGO. In order to assess the treatment success, means of HAM-D17 and CDSS scores at both baseline and week 6 will be compared within the efficacy sample (at least one application of AGO, LOCF). The primary endpoint will be tested with a two-sided student's t-test at a level of statistical significance of ≤.05.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary efficacy measures: Response rates
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
We will determine the percentage of responses (decrease of HAMD by at least 50 %)
6 weeks and 3 months
Secondary efficacy measures: Long-term efficacy
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
After 12 weeks of treatment we plan to compare means of HAMD and CDSS with baseline data.
6 weeks and 3 months
Secondary efficacy measures: Psychosocial functioning
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
During treatment psychosocial functioning might improve. We plan to compare means of PSP scale assessed after 6 weeks and 3 months with baseline data.
6 weeks and 3 months
Secondary tolerability and safety measures: Psychotic symptoms
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The stability of the psychotic syndrome during treatment with AGO will be evaluated comparing means of PANSS after 6 weeks and 3 months with baseline.
6 weeks and 3 months
Secondary tolerability and safety measures: General tolerability
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The general tolerability measures include the exploration and documentation of adverse events.
6 weeks and 3 months
Secondary tolerability and safety measures: Pharmacokinetic interactions between AGO and antipsychotic agents
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
Effects of AGO treatment on serum drug levels of antipsychotic agents will be evaluated by comparing the SDLs at baseline with values obtained after 6 weeks and 3 months.
6 weeks and 3 months
Secondary efficacy measures: Remission rates
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
We will determine the percentage of remissions (decrease of HAMD below 8)
6 weeks and 3 months
Secondary efficacy measures: Cognitive functioning
Time Frame: 3 months
During treatment neurocognitive deficits might improve. We plan to compare means in the MCCB assessed after 3 months with baseline data.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Servier

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mathias Zink, MD, Central Institute of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 27, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 2, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 8, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 7, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 01112012

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings