Comparison of Two tDCS Protocols for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

December 13, 2013 updated by: Andre Brunoni, University of Sao Paulo

Comparison of Two Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Protocols for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: a Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Transcranial direct cranial stimulation (tDCS) is a novel technique based on the application of a weak electrical current over the scalp through two electrodes - the anode, which facilitates neuronal depolarization, and the cathode, which leads to neuronal hyper-polarization. Recently, several open-label and sham-controlled clinical trials applied daily tDCS sessions for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Theoretically, tDCS displays depression improvement through anodal stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal, inducing excitability-enhancing effects over this area, which is hypoactive during the acute depressive episode. The present study is aimed at comparing two different tDCS protocols: (1) active anodic stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with cathode placed over an extra cephalic area; (2) active cathode placed over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with anode placed over an extra cephalic area.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The present research protocol will evaluate clinical effects of two different tDCS protocols: (1) active anodic stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with cathode placed over an extra cephalic area; (2) active cathode placed over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with anode placed over an extra cephalic area. Patients will be clinically evaluated with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for depression. Symptoms intensity will be rated according to The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD -17 items) - main outcome. Patients with scores higher than 16 will be included. Patients with active neurological or severe disorders (such as cancer or auto-imune disorders) will be excluded. The present study is a double-blinded, controlled, randomized trial with 30 patients with depression. The intervention protocol consist in 15 consecutive daily tDCS sessions (skipping the weekend). After meeting eligibility criteria, patients will be randomized (computer generated list) to one of the two intervention groups. We will use a direct current of 2.0 milliamperes (mA) for 30 min. The 35 cm2-rubber electrodes will be wrapped in cotton material, which should be moistened with saline as to reduce impedance. Patients will be clinically assessed at baseline and at end of 6 weeks. Main outcome will be based on HAMD-17 items at a final endpoint of 6-weeks, with secondary outcomes assessing Beck Depression Inventory (21 items) at 6 weeks. Other evaluation scales include Beck Anxiety Inventory, Hamilton Anxiety Scale and Safety and cognitive assessment will be performed with The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, adverse effects scales and clinical evaluation with a trained physician.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05508000
        • Hospital Universitário - USP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with age between 18-89 years, depression diagnosis according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-iV); HAMD scores higher than 16; accordance to inform consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active neurologic or severe disorder (such as cancer or auto-imune)
  • pregnancy;
  • need for hospitalization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: cathodal F4

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Cathodal tDCS over F4 (right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) Anodal tDCS over the left deltoid (extra-cephalic) n=15
Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Current Stimulation with cathodal stimulation over right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Anodal stimulation over left deltoid region
Other Names:
  • tDCS
  • Brain stimulation
  • Brain polarization
Experimental: Anodal F3

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation'

Anodal tDCS over F3 (right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) Cathodal tDCS over the right deltoid (extra-cephalic) n=15
Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Current Stimulation with cathodal stimulation over right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Anodal stimulation over left deltoid region
Other Names:
  • tDCS
  • Brain stimulation
  • Brain polarization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17 items (HAMD17)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 3 and 6
reduction of depressive symptoms as assessed by HAMD17
Weeks 0, 3 and 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 3 and 6
reduction of depressive symptoms as assessed by MADRS
Weeks 0, 3 and 6
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 3 and 6
reduction of depressive symptoms as assessed by BDI
Weeks 0, 3 and 6
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 3 and 6
reduction of anxiety symptoms as assessed by BAI
Weeks 0, 3 and 6
Hamilton Anxiety Inventory (HAI)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 3 and 6
reduction of anxiety symptoms as assessed by HAI
Weeks 0, 3 and 6
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Moca)
Time Frame: Weeks 0 and 6
evaluate cognitive stability as assessed by Moca
Weeks 0 and 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Sao Paulo

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Andre R Brunoni, PhD, Center of Clinical Research - Hospital Universitário USP; Sao Paulo; Brazil

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 24, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 16, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 13, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • aF3_cF4_F32

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings