Comparison of Different Surgical Treatments for Different Scales of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Comparison of Simple Decompression Versus Anterior Subcutaneous and Intramuscular Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve for Moderate and Severe Cubital Tunnel Syndrome :A Randomized Double-blind Control Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Jilin
-
Changchun, Jilin, China, 130000
- Recruiting
- Hand Surgery Department of China-Japan Union Hospital
-
Contact:
- Rui Li, chief doctor
- Phone Number: 13304321102
- Email: 447567095@qq.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with confirmed cubital tunnel syndrome
- moderate and severe cubital tunnel syndrome.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant cervical spine and shoulder disease
- deformity or distortion of the cubital tunnel due to previous trauma to elbow
- recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome after previous surgery
- mild cubital tunnel syndrome.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: moderate cubital tunnel syndrome
Sensory,Intermittent paresthesias; vibratory perception normal or decreasedMotor,Measurable weakness in pinch or grip strengthTests,Elbow flexion test or Tinel's sign is positive; finger crossing may be abnormal.Treated by simple decompression,anterior subcutaneous transposition and anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve.
|
decompression of the ulnar nerve
Other Names:
transposition of the ulnar nerve into subcutaneous bed
Other Names:
transposition of the ulnar nerve into muscular tissue
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: severe cubital tunnel syndrome
Sensory,Persistent paresthesias; vibratory perception decreased; abnormal two-point discrimination(static >6 mm, moving >4 mm)Motor,Measurable weakness in pinch and grip plus muscle atrophyTests,Positive elbow flexion test or positive Tinel's sign may be present; finger crossing usually abnormal.Treated by simple decompression,anterior subcutaneous transposition and anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve.
|
decompression of the ulnar nerve
Other Names:
transposition of the ulnar nerve into subcutaneous bed
Other Names:
transposition of the ulnar nerve into muscular tissue
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
sensation
Time Frame: at 6 months post-operatively
|
Sensory disturbance were tested with Semmes-Weinstein filaments and sensory deficits were categorized according to the Yale sensory scale.
According to standard scoring system that designed, the severity of sensation and function of the ulnar nerve was scored as follows: ---- 0, Abscent sensation; 1, Decrease or abnormal sensation; 2, Intact sensation.
|
at 6 months post-operatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Muscle strength
Time Frame: at 6 months post-operatively
|
Muscle strength was evaluated with the grading system from the Medical Research Council which is based upon a scale of zero to five: 0, No muscle contraction; 1,Flicker or trace of muscle contraction; 2,Limb or joint movement possible only with gravity eliminated; 3,Limb or joint movement against gravity only; 4,Power decreased but limb or joint movement possible against resistance; 5,Normal power against resistance.
Then results were scored as follows: ---- 0,Poor (0-1); 1,Moderate (2-3); 2,Good (4-5)
|
at 6 months post-operatively
|
|
pain
Time Frame: at 6 months post-operatively
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with scores of zero to ten (0 for no pain and 10 intolerable pain) then scored as follows: ---- 0, Sever (8-10); 1, Slight (4-7); 2, none (0-3)
|
at 6 months post-operatively
|
|
electromyography
Time Frame: at 6 months post-operatively
|
Compare the result at 6 months post-operatively with the result before operation.To see if there is an improvement in the function of the ulnar nerve.0,no
improvement;1,improvement.
|
at 6 months post-operatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Rui Li, chief doctor, Hand Sugery Department of the China-Japan Union Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Nervous System Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Disease
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Mononeuropathies
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Nerve Compression Syndromes
- Cumulative Trauma Disorders
- Sprains and Strains
- Ulnar Nerve Compression Syndromes
- Ulnar Neuropathies
- Syndrome
- Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- JilinU-218-RLi
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.