Effect of Perilla Extract on Improvement on Gastrointestinal Discomfort
Effect of Perilla Extract on Improvement of Intestinal Discomfort and Bowel Function in Healthy Volunteers With Gastrointestinal Discomfort
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Esslingen, Germany, 73728
- BioTeSys GmbH
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy volunteers without clinical diagnosed diseases with relevant effect on the gastrointestinal system or on visceral motility.
- BMI: 19-30 kg/m2
- Reduced bowel movements defined as an average of >1 and ≤ 3.5 stools per week for at least the previous 6 months
- Gastrointestinal symptoms of at least 5 points
- Male or female
- Age ≥ 30 and ≤ 70 years
- Nonsmoker
- Written consent to participate in the study
- Able and willing to follow the study protocol procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject under prescription for medication for digestive symptoms such as anti-spasmodic, laxatives and anti-diarrheic drugs or other digestive auxiliaries
- Relevant history, presence of any medical disorder or intake of medication / dietary supplements, potentially interfering with this trial at screening
- Subjects with stool frequency of ≤ 1 stool every 7 days or > 3,5 stools per week
- Subjects not willing to avoid pre- and probiotics for the duration of the study
- Intake of antibiotics in the last 4 weeks and laxatives in the last 2 weeks
- Change of dietary habits within the 4 weeks prior to screening (for instance start of a diet high in fibers)
- Pregnant subject or subject planning to become pregnant during the study; breast-feeding subject.
- Subjects with history of drug, alcohol or other substances abuse, or other factors limiting their ability to co-operate during the study.
- Participants anticipating a change in their lifestyle or physical activity levels since this may also influence the results.
- Known food intolerance or allergy.
- Subject involved in any clinical or food study within the preceding month
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Perilla extract
Experimental arm: Perilla extract
|
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Maltodextrin
Placebo arm: Maltodextrin
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
daily gastrointestinal symptoms
Time Frame: was assessed daily during 4 week intervention
|
The following gastrointestinal were rated and reported by the study participants on a daily based.
Bloating, rumbling, feeling of fullness, passage of gas, abdominal discomfort (pain and cramps).
The rating was done based on a number scale.
0 not at all and 4 extremely.
|
was assessed daily during 4 week intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
validated questionnaires
Time Frame: assessed at visit 1 (before) and at visit 2 (after 4 week intervention)
|
Three validated questionnaires were used. Two of them were specially designed to evaluate gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life of people with constipation. The third questionnaire was a validated questionnaire to report stress levels and related changes of stress levels.
|
assessed at visit 1 (before) and at visit 2 (after 4 week intervention)
|
|
stool consistency
Time Frame: reported at days with stool during 4 week intervention
|
The stool consistency was rated referring to the Bristol stool scale.
A scale indicated with pictures how the stool consistency can be rated.
|
reported at days with stool during 4 week intervention
|
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: assessed at visit 1 (before) and at visit 2 (after 4 week intervention)
|
All adverse events which might be linked to the study product were reported.
As the tested study product is a food product being safe for consumption as food no specific parameter to define safety were defined.
|
assessed at visit 1 (before) and at visit 2 (after 4 week intervention)
|
|
Stool frequency
Time Frame: reported at days with stool during 4 week intervention
|
The stool frequency was reported on each day with bowel movement.
|
reported at days with stool during 4 week intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- BTS656/12
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.