Efficacy of Low (30ml) Versus Full Dose (100ml) Contrast CT Pulmonary Angiography in Detecting Emboli

November 6, 2016 updated by: Bruce Barack, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Efficacy Of Low(30 Ml) Versus Full Dose (100 Ml)Contrast CT Pulmonary Angiography Performed On 64 Multi-Detector CT In Detecting Emboli

With the improvement in CT scanners and injectors, diagnostic chest CT can now be performed in less than 10 seconds. It was hypothesized that diagnostic CT pulmonary angiograms could be done with less than the usual 80-120 ml of contrast used. We have developed a method of performing diagnostic CT pulmonary angiograms with 30 ml of intravenous contrast in most patients. The long-term objective of this study is to show that there is no difference in the diagnostic efficacy of this low dose 30 ml technique when compared to the more traditional full-dose technique.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Potential participants in the study will have been referred to the radiology section for a CTPA for a suspected pulmonary embolus. The radiologist will review the patient's record in CPRS, as is done routinely in this situation. Patients with class 3 or 4 CHF, supraventricular tachycardia, Serum Creatinine >1.5 mg/dl (>1.3 mg/dl female), history of contrast allergy, or unable to give informed consent will be excluded from both arms of the study. Patients with serum creatinine >1.28 mg/dl require referring physician approval. If the participant appears to qualify for the study then the study physician will contact the referring physician and inform him/her of the study. If the referring physician is agreeable then either the radiologist or the referring physician will approach the patient, either at the bedside or in the radiology clinic to determine if the patient is interested in participating in the study. If so, a study radiologist will begin the informed consent process. After informed consent is obtained the subject will be computer randomized to either the new low-dose or full-dose technique protocols. A total of 220 studies (110 per group) will be performed.

Multidetector CT Scan: All CT examinations will be performed on the Siemens Sensation 64-MDCT scanner. Visipaque (Iodixanol) 320 non-ionic isoosmolar contrast agent will be used in all contrast examinations followed by a subsequent injection of normal saline. An informed written consent for the injection of IV contrast will be obtained prior to all CT examinations. Safe venous access will be obtained via either an antecubital vein or a central venous line. For low dose CT pulmonary angiograms, 30 ml of IV Radio Contrast Material (RCM) will be injected at a flow rate of 5 ml/second followed by an injection of 20 ml of normal saline at 5ml/second. The region of interest (ROI) will be the superior vena cava (SVC) at the approximate level of the aortic arch. The scan will be triggered to begin at 75 Hounsfield units (HU). For Full dose CT pulmonary angiograms, 100 ml of IV RCM will be injected at a flow rate of 5ml/sec. The ROI will be the main pulmonary artery. The scan will be triggered at 120 HU. One mm contiguous axial spiral scans will be obtained from the apex of the lung through the adrenals. Reformatted 1.5 mm axial, 3 mm axial, 1.5 mm coronal and sagittal images will be obtained. All images will be uploaded to the AGFA Picture Archiving Communication System (PACS) workstation for interpretation. The costs of all CT scans and RCM will be covered by the Department of Imaging as the majority of the studies are part of routine clinical care.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
        • VALosAngeles

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients referred for CT pulmonary angiogram to exclude pulmonary embolus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Class 3 or 4 Congestive Heart Failure
  • Supraventricular tachycardia
  • History of contrast allergy
  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Patients with serum creatinine >1.28 mg/dl without referring physician approval

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Low-Dose IV Contrast
A single intravenous dose of 30 ml of Visipaque 320 non-ionic isoosmolar contrast agent will be given for each CT scan. The CT scan will be performed using a Siemens Sensation 64-MDCT scanner.
Procedure: Low-Dose IV Contrast
A single intravenous dose of 30 ml of Visipaque (Iodixanol) 320 non-ionic isoosmolar contrast agent will be given for each CT scan.
Other Names:
  • Visipaque
  • Iodixanol
Device: Siemens Sensation 64-MDCT scanner.
The device will be used to perform CT Pulmonary Angiograms
Drug: Visipaque 320 non-ionic isoosmolar contrast agent
Single Dose of Intravenous Iodixanol will be administered per CT scan.
Other Names:
  • Iodixanol
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Full-Dose IV Contrast
A single intravenous dose of 100ml of Visipaque 320 non-ionic isoosmolar contrast agent will be given for each CT scan. The CT scan will be performed using a Siemens Sensation 64-MDCT scanner.
Procedure: Low-Dose IV Contrast
A single intravenous dose of 30 ml of Visipaque (Iodixanol) 320 non-ionic isoosmolar contrast agent will be given for each CT scan.
Other Names:
  • Visipaque
  • Iodixanol
Device: Siemens Sensation 64-MDCT scanner.
The device will be used to perform CT Pulmonary Angiograms
Drug: Visipaque 320 non-ionic isoosmolar contrast agent
Single Dose of Intravenous Iodixanol will be administered per CT scan.
Other Names:
  • Iodixanol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
CT Image Quality Score
Time Frame: Within 4 weeks of the CT scan
Within 4 weeks of the CT scan

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bruce M. Barack, M.D., VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 21, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 4, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 8, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 6, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2012-101526

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings