Effects of Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine on Cerebral Oxygenation During Intrathecal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients

February 3, 2015 updated by: Diana L Fernandez Galinski, Corporacion Parc Tauli

Comparison of the Effects of Bupivacaine or Levobupivacaine on Cerebral Oxygenation During Intrathecal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Who Underwent Hip Fracture Repair

Elderly patients with hip fracture are frail due to associated comorbidity. In these situations, regional anesthesia is recommended as it is associated to less postoperative cognitive dysfunction. However, hypotension during the process may impair ischemic cardiopathy and induce a cerebrovascular stroke. Selection of the right anesthetic agent and the administration of vasoactive drugs during the process can minimize these risks. Although bupivacaine and levobupivacaine share pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, the studies show conflicting results. The aim of this study is to investigate if there are clinically relevant differences between these two drugs in terms of hemodynamic parameters during the surgical process with special focus on the effects on regional cerebral oximetry and cognitive status after surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
58

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Barcelona
      • Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain, 08208
        • Hospital de Sabadell

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients older than 70 years old who undergo major surgery for hip fracture and will receive intrathecal anesthesia
  2. Patients in which it is considered adequate, according to the usual clinical practice, the use of bupivacaine or levobupivacaine as part of the intrathecal anesthesia
  3. Patients who give their informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients allergic to anesthetic drugs to be used in the protocol or to local anesthetics amida type.
  2. Patients with severe aortic stenosis or hemodynamic instability.
  3. Patients who refuse the anesthetic technique or contraindication for the use of the intrathecal technique.
  4. Patients with severe cognitive impairment previous to the intervention (defined by a score in the Pfeiffer test of 8-10 errors)
  5. Patients in which the use of bupivacaine or levobupivacaine is contraindicated as part of the intrathecal anesthesia
  6. Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, could pose a risk to the patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Bupivacaine

Intrathecal administration of bupivacaine 0.5%

Doses:

Bupivacaine 7 mg plus fentanyl 15 ug for patients shorter than 160 cm. Bupivacaine 9 mg plus fentanyl 15 ug for patients equal or taller than 160 cm or hip replacement.
Drug: fentanyl 15 microg
Drug: Bupivacaine 7 mg
Drug: Bupivacaine 9 mg
Active Comparator: Levobupivacaine

Intrathecal administration of levobupivacaine 0.5%:

Doses:

Levobupivacaine 7 mg plus fentanyl 15 ug for patients shorter than 160 cm. Levobupivacaine 9 mg plus fentanyl 15 ug for patients equal or taller than 160 cm or hip replacement.
Drug: fentanyl 15 microg
Drug: Levobupivacaine 7 mg
Drug: Levobupivacaine 9 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of intraoperative time with a decrease of cerebral regional oxygen saturation (SrO2), of at least 20% with respect to baseline values
Time Frame: Measured continuously during surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)
Measured continuously during surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in cognitive function after 7 days with respect to preoperative function, measured by means of the Pfeiffer cognitive test
Time Frame: 7 days post surgery
7 days post surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of intraoperative time with a decrease in values of cerebral regional oxygen saturation to 40% or 50%
Time Frame: Measured continuously during surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)
Measured continuously during surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)
Time to first drop of cerebral regional oxygen saturation below 40% or 50%
Time Frame: Assessed up to the end of surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)
Assessed up to the end of surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)
Changes in cerebral regional oxygen saturation induced by the administration of vasoconstrictor drugs
Time Frame: Measured continuously for the whole duration of surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)
Measured continuously for the whole duration of surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)
Doses of vasoactive drugs administered
Time Frame: measured up to the end of surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)
measured up to the end of surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)
Adverse events and mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Measured continuously for the whole duration of surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)
Measured continuously for the whole duration of surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)
Heart Rate
Time Frame: Measured continuously for the whole duration of surgery (an expeted average of 60 minutes)
Measured continuously for the whole duration of surgery (an expeted average of 60 minutes)
Oxygen saturation during the surgery
Time Frame: Measured continuously for the whole duration of surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)
Measured continuously for the whole duration of surgery (an expected average of 60 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Corporacion Parc Tauli

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 23, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 9, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 4, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ANE-INTRA-2013

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings