Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Norspan to Tramadol/Acetaminophen With Prolonged Postoperative Pain (PASSION)

June 1, 2016 updated by: Mundipharma Korea Ltd

A Multicenter, Phase IV, Interventional Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of NORSPAN to Tramadol/Acetaminophen in Patients With Prolonged Postoperative Pain After Spinal Surgery (PASSION)

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of buprenorphine transdermal system to tramadol/acetaminophen.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
136

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Sanggye Paik Hospital, Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Korean men and women aged 20 years or more
  • Presence of pain associated with a spinal disease and lumbar fusion at 1-2 spinal segments (1-2 level lumbar fusion surgery)
  • Moderate to severe pain of the NRS pain score ≥ 4 at Visit 1 (14~90 days after surgery, Baseline) (Amended 21Nov2013)
  • Consent to participate in the study and voluntary signature on the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women of childbearing potential, except for the following cases:
  • A partner who is vasectomized or otherwise surgically sterile.
  • Use of 2 contraception methods. Two methods include the combination of double-barrier contraception or barrier contraception and hormone contraception, and appropriate barrier methods are as follows: Diaphragm (female contraceptive device), condom, intrauterine (copper or hormone), sponge or spermicide. Hormonal contraceptives include all commercially available products containing estrogen and/or progesterone.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women. Pregnant woman is defined as a woman after fertilization to late pregnancy with a positive result from the urine pregnancy test.
  • History of hypersensitivity to buprenorphine, tramadol, APAP or excipients, and celecoxib
  • Medical history of asthma, acute rhinitis, nasal polyp, vascular edema urticaria or allergic reaction to aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs, COX-2)
  • Hypersensitivity or intolerance to Domperidone
  • Risk of gastrointestinal irritation such as gastrointestinal bleeding, mechanical ileus or perforation
  • Genetic problem such as galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption
  • Severely impaired respiratory function or respiratory depression
  • Current use of monoamine oxidase(MAO) inhibitors or the medication history within 2 weeks prior to study participation
  • Convulsive disorder, head injury, shock, decreased level of consciousness of uncertain origin, intracranial lesion or increased intracranial pressure or severe hepatic impairment
  • Biliary tract disorder
  • Presence or suspected drug abuse history
  • Medical history of opioid or drug dependence
  • Current use of other CNS inhibitors or muscle relaxants that may result in dyspnea, hypotension, severe sedation or coma when used with the investigational product, opioid analgesics
  • Use of strong opioids, buprenorphine or tramadol/APAP within 1 week prior to study participation (however, study participation is allowed for PRN prescription of PCA and strong opioids)
  • Any condition representing a contraindication of application of buprenorphine, tramadol/APAP or celecoxib
  • Major pain not attributable to a spinal disease
  • Anticancer therapy that may affect pain assessment
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular or renal dysfunction
  • Postoperative complications
  • Symptoms of acute pain after lumbar fusion or characteristic analgesic features showing rapidly changing needs for analgesics
  • Current use of other investigational product at enrollment or within 30 days after administration of other investigational product

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: buprenorphine
Patch
Drug: buprenorphine
Dosage and administration: This one patch should be attached every 7 days.
Other Names:
  • Norspan patch
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: tramadol/acetaminophen
Oral tablet
Drug: tramadol/acetaminophen

Amount of drug ingredients

: Acetaminophen 325 mg and Tramadol hydrochloride 37.5 mg in 1 tablet of this drug.

Dosage and administration:

Adjust dose depending on a patient's pain severity and treatment response. Starting at the initial dose of 2 tablets, usually administer 4 tablets per dose, twice daily. At a dosing interval of at least 12 hr, the daily dose should not exceed 8 tablets.

Other Names:
  • Ultracet ER semi

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Pain Intensity Score (0-10 NRS) From Visit 1 (Baseline) to 6weeks After Treatment.
Time Frame: baseline and 6 weeks
NRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week6/ET minus mean score at Baseline.
baseline and 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Pain Intensity Score (0-10 NRS) From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 2 of the Investigational Product Administration
Time Frame: 2 weeks
NRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week 2/ET minus mean score at Baseline.
2 weeks
Change in the Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Score From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 6 Post-dose
Time Frame: Baseline and at 6 weeks

EQ-5D to measure of health related quality of life should be answered as one of 3 levels about current condition for 5 dimensions for 'Motor capability', 'Self-care', 'Daily activities', 'Pain/discomfort', 'Depression/anxiety' and was calculated total average by giving a weighting on 3 level of answers (EQ-5D levels into 'no problems' (level 1) and 'problems' (level 2 and 3)).

*EQ-5D Total = 1 - 0.081 - (the score of the each level) - 0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents)

EQ-5D total score could be 0.919 in maximum and -0.594 in minimum if case all index indicates the level 3. So, if EQ-5D total score closed by "1" means that the healthy condition and high quality of life.
Baseline and at 6 weeks
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life Assessed by EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and at 6weeks
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' (score = 100) and 'Worst imaginable health state' (score = 0). Higher points were positive results and positive points of difference gap means improvement results.
Baseline and at 6weeks
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The number of patients who choose the best opinion of overall satisfaction among Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale(CGIC) among 7 point scale. Missing data was imputed by LOCF. Scores measure from 1: Very much improved to 7:very much worse.
6 weeks
Patient Global Impressions of Change(PGIC)
Time Frame: 6 weeks

In the PP set, Number of participants with categorical change in overall satisfaction.

PGIC: a participant-rated instrument assessing change in participant's overall satisfaction from baseline, on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mundipharma Korea Ltd

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jinhyok Kim, Dr.PhD, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 1, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BUP13-KR-401

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings